sr-users July 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

54 participants
51 discussions

Using the dialog module. dialog was not destroyed with BYE message

by woenho＠gmail.com

According to the documentation a dialog is automatically destroyed when a BYE is received. But, dialog was not destroyed. What can I do? I am testing with kamailio 5.5 version

2 years, 9 months

Subscriber Management using JSONRPC over HTTP

by Surabhi Garg

Hi Team, Greetings! I was trying to use HTTP to do the subscriber management (CRUD operations) & for that I am using JSONRPC-S module (JSONRPC over HTTP). But like other modules e.g. dispatcher, location I am unable to find any RPC commands for doing subscriber management (checked in auth_db) module. So is there a way to achieve subscriber management using JSONRPC over HTTP. Few HTTP examples which I am using for dispatcher module are given below. Similar commands I am looking for subscriber management as well. curl http://localhost:8081/RPC -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d " {\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"dispatcher.add\", \"params\":[2, \"sip:127.0.0.1:5061\"], \"id\": \"1\"}" curl http://localhost:8081/RPC -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d " {\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"dispatcher.remove\”, \"params\":[2, \"sip:127.0.0.1:5061\"], \"id\": \"1\"}" Surabhi Garg Mobile - 91 783 888 7523

2 years, 9 months

How to check If Alias is already Set in Contact Header

by Juha Heinanen

Transformations (e.g. nameaddr.uri and uri.param.name) on $ct are your friends. -- Juha

2 years, 9 months

How to check If Alias is already Set in Contact Header

by Terry Tailor

Hi, I'm having the following scenario UA <---> Prox1 <----> Proxy2 <-----> B2BUA <------> UA Proxy2 and B2BUA are connected on LAN and Proxy1 is adding his own Contact Alias and Proxy 2 is adding his own Contact Alias I'm adding Alias via using the following function set_contact_alias("1") as it will remove other contact alias but is causing the problem in the case of BYE coming from B2BUA. Is there is a way to find if the contact alias is already set? How I can replace the local IP alias with domain name when request is coming from B2BUA and alias is added by Proxy2. Here are logs to show problem in 200 sent by B2BUA and proxy2 add alias 10.44.44.2~6000~1 Now in ACK it is causing the problem SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.prox1.example.com:5060 ;rport=5060;received=3.18.1.21;branch=z9hG4bK2d66.a89039bedfe3d1113132f04c94b8a757.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.168:50279 ;received=109.8.2.1;rport=45607;branch=z9hG4bKPj84875d08eafc48bfa6c29de5fe245cea Record-Route: <sip:sip.proxy2.example;lr;did=e84.87e2;rtp=bridge> Record-Route: <sip:sip.prox1.example.com;lr;did=e84.7452;rtp=bridge> From: "8001" <sip:8001@sip.example.com>;tag=0b9915abae654e21845fd4d7f577ede9 To: <sip:2501@sip.example.com>;tag=as1f4f6b1c Call-ID: a0095b9868924b0681225a8884a06c22 CSeq: 3687 INVITE Server: Voip Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uas Contact: <sip:2501@10.44.44.2:6000;alias=10.44.44.2~6000~1> Content-Type: application/sdp Require: timer Content-Length: 281 Ack for 200 ACK sip:2501@10.44.44.2:6000 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.proxy2.example.com:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK2d66.3c10a3b45e5c8caacbc5853d5e6418b2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.proxy1.example.com:5060;rport=5060;received= 3.18.1.21 ;branch=z9hG4bK2d66.788312006d5f7aedc058435cd203fed3.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.168:50279;received= 109.8.2.1 ;rport=45607;branch=z9hG4bKPjf003c3bfe4ba423e9a0dedd647511dd3 Max-Forwards: 68 From: "8001" <sip:8001@sip.example.com>;tag=0b9915abae654e21845fd4d7f577ede9 To: <sip:2501@sip.example.com>;tag=as1f4f6b1c Call-ID: a0095b9868924b0681225a8884a06c22 CSeq: 3687 ACK Content-Length: 0 Thanks in advance

2 years, 9 months

SECSIPID Identity Decode

by Daniel W. Graham

I am unable to base64url decode the json payload in identity header generated by secsipid. (Using python for test) decoded_payload = url64.decode(‘payload’) UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 27: invalid continuation byte Header decodes fine this way but not payload. Is this an issue with the payload encoding? Kamailio 5.5 Daniel W. Graham, CTO CMSInter.net LLC DIRECT (989) 400-4230 INTERNET | TELEPHONE | MANAGED IT

2 years, 9 months

I found bug in sipdump module.

by woenho

2 years, 9 months

Re: [SR-Users] SECSIPID Identity Decode

by Daniel W. Graham

This was already pointed out, $mb. Thanks, -dan On Jul 2, 2021, at 4:40 PM, Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:

2 years, 9 months

crash when sending reply

by Juha Heinanen

Kamailio 5.5 crashed when sending reply (bt full below). Before the crash there had been several mysql related error messages ("Lost connection to MySQL server during query" and "Too many connections") in syslog when async worker tried to insert accounting data. So perhaps this core dump has something to do with that. -- Juha Reading symbols from /usr/bin/sip-proxy...done. [New LWP 21324] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/bin/sip-proxy -f /etc/sip-proxy/sip-proxy.cfg -P /run/sip-proxy/sip-proxy.'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007fd274ce3b6e in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0x7fd2532503a8, type=512, trans=0x7fd253250330, params=0x7fff9b8eb2b0) at t_hooks.c:254 254 t_hooks.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007fd274ce3b6e in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0x7fd2532503a8, type=512, trans=0x7fd253250330, params=0x7fff9b8eb2b0) at t_hooks.c:254 cbp = 0x10 backup_from = 0x5613ccfb37f0 <def_list+16> backup_to = 0x5613ccfb37f8 <def_list+24> backup_dom_from = 0x5613ccfb3800 <def_list+32> backup_dom_to = 0x5613ccfb3808 <def_list+40> backup_uri_from = 0x5613ccfb37e0 <def_list> backup_uri_to = 0x5613ccfb37e8 <def_list+8> backup_xavps = 0x5613ccf56270 <_xavp_list_head> backup_xavus = 0x5613ccf56278 <_xavu_list_head> backup_xavis = 0x5613ccf56280 <_xavi_list_head> __func__ = "run_trans_callbacks_internal" #1 0x00007fd274ce41f7 in run_trans_callbacks_with_buf (type=512, rbuf=0x7fd253250400, req=0x7fd252d6dd20, repl=0x7fd2758bf0b0, flags=0) at t_hooks.c:303 params = {req = 0x7fd252d6dd20, rpl = 0x7fd2758bf0b0, param = 0x7fd254760f60, code = 486, flags = 0, branch = 0, t_rbuf = 0x7fd253250400, dst = 0x7fd253250450, send_buf = { s = 0x7fd25325b9f0 "@", len = 579}} trans = 0x7fd253250330 #2 0x00007fd274c88c15 in relay_reply (t=0x7fd253250330, p_msg=0x7fd2758bf0b0, branch=0, msg_status=486, cancel_data=0x7fff9b8eb580, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:2133 relay = 0 save_clone = 0 buf = 0x7fd275ca0ff0 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX.com;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX>;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"... res_len = 579 relayed_code = 486 relayed_msg = 0x7fd2758bf0b0 reply_bak = 0x7fd2510f1000 bm = {to_tag_val = {s = 0x7fd25216e4c0 "@\003", len = 1377234752}} totag_retr = 0 reply_status = RPS_COMPLETED uas_rb = 0x7fd253250400 to_tag = 0x7fd25216e820 reason = {s = 0x7fd25216e830 "0", len = 1394935248} onsend_params = {req = 0x9b8eb420, rpl = 0x7fd274c6b10d <futex_get+40>, param = 0x1, code = 1359984720, flags = 32722, branch = 0, t_rbuf = 0x7fff9b8eb460, dst = 0xa0679800, send_buf = { s = 0x19b8eb450 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x19b8eb450>, len = 1359984720}} ip = {af = 2609820752, len = 32767, u = {addrl = {94643040895493, 0}, addr32 = {3436528133, 22035, 0, 0}, addr16 = {16901, 52437, 22035, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, addr = "\005B\325\314\023V\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}} __func__ = "relay_reply" #3 0x00007fd274c8de6b in reply_received (p_msg=0x7fd2758bf0b0) at t_reply.c:2680 msg_status = 486 last_uac_status = 180 ack = 0x7fd25216e830 "0" ack_len = 459 branch = 0 reply_status = 32722 onreply_route = 2 cancel_data = {cancel_bitmap = 0, reason = {cause = 0, u = {text = {s = 0x0, len = 1977055608}, e2e_cancel = 0x0, packed_hdrs = {s = 0x0, len = 1977055608}}}} uac = 0x7fd2532505c0 t = 0x7fd253250330 lack_dst = {send_sock = 0x40, to = {s = {sa_family = 49168, sa_data = "\207u\322\177\000\000\220\266\216\233\377\177\000"}, sin = {sin_family = 49168, sin_port = 30087, sin_addr = { s_addr = 32722}, sin_zero = "\220\266\216\233\377\177\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 49168, sin6_port = 30087, sin6_flowinfo = 32722, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = { __u6_addr8 = "\220\266\216\233\377\177\000\000L=\215s\322\177\000", __u6_addr16 = {46736, 39822, 32767, 0, 15692, 29581, 32722, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {2609821328, 32767, 1938636108, 32722}}}, sin6_scope_id = 1971831024}, sas = {ss_family = 49168, __ss_padding = "\207u\322\177\000\000\220\266\216\233\377\177\000\000L=\215s\322\177\000\000\360\300\207u\322\177", '\000' <repeats 13 times>, "\b\000\000\000\000\060Z\264u\322\177\000\000\213\t\342\316\023V\000\000;\b\342\316\023V\000\000\020\313\320\000\000\000\000\000\020\000\000\000\000\000\000\000I\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\230g\240\210\347A\357\300\266\216\233\377\177\000\000\000\230g\240\210\347", <incomplete sequence \357>, __ss_align = 0}}, id = 0, send_flags = {f = 0, blst_imask = 0}, proto = 0 '\000', proto_pad0 = 0 '\000', proto_pad1 = 0} backup_user_from = 0x5613ccfb37f0 <def_list+16> backup_user_to = 0x5613ccfb37f8 <def_list+24> backup_domain_from = 0x5613ccfb3800 <def_list+32> backup_domain_to = 0x5613ccfb3808 <def_list+40> backup_uri_from = 0x5613ccfb37e0 <def_list> backup_uri_to = 0x5613ccfb37e8 <def_list+8> backup_xavps = 0x5613ccf56270 <_xavp_list_head> backup_xavus = 0x5613ccf56278 <_xavu_list_head> backup_xavis = 0x5613ccf56280 <_xavi_list_head> replies_locked = 1 branch_ret = 0 prev_branch = 1971830800 blst_503_timeout = 32722 hf = 0xb5c750 onsend_params = {req = 0x7fff9b8eb5e0, rpl = 0xef41e788a0679800, param = 0x30, code = 0, flags = 0, branch = 0, t_rbuf = 0x0, dst = 0x7fd27d972cb0 <__syslog>, send_buf = { s = 0x5613ccec69b3 "INFO", len = -1603823616}} ctx = {rec_lev = 0, run_flags = 2, last_retcode = -1, jmp_env = {{__jmpbuf = {0, -5133089567146157739, 0, 140542026919088, 94643042412979, 536870912, -5133089567232140971, -1505551737941960363}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = {__val = {140735803210560, 13683472, 7765887371, 140735803209568, 94643041089583, 0, 17240315422543681536, 0, 0, 0, 0, 94643042412979, 17240315422543681536, 140735803209872, 94643041372964, 2866715017336}}}}} bctx = 0x7fd27587c010 keng = 0x0 ret = 0 evname = {s = 0x7fd274d3696f "on_sl_reply", len = 11} __func__ = "reply_received" #4 0x00005613ccbba0d4 in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7fd2758bf0b0, mode=0) at core/forward.c:764 new_buf = 0x0 dst = {send_sock = 0x0, to = {s = {sa_family = 0, sa_data = '\000' <repeats 13 times>}, sin = {sin_family = 0, sin_port = 0, sin_addr = {s_addr = 0}, sin_zero = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 0, sin6_port = 0, sin6_flowinfo = 0, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 0}, sas = {ss_family = 0, __ss_padding = '\000' <repeats 117 times>, __ss_align = 0}}, id = 0, send_flags = {f = 0, blst_imask = 0}, proto = 0 '\000', proto_pad0 = 0 '\000', proto_pad1 = 0} new_len = 0 r = 2 ip = {af = 1, len = 6356993, u = {addrl = {140735803210560, 140541891965104}, addr32 = {2609822528, 32767, 1972105392, 32722}, addr16 = {47936, 39822, 32767, 0, 61616, 30091, 32722, 0}, addr = "@\273\216\233\377\177\000\000\260\360\213u\322\177\000"}} s = 0xef41e788a0679800 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xef41e788a0679800> len = -1685145520 __func__ = "do_forward_reply" #5 0x00005613ccbbc23c in forward_reply (msg=0x7fd2758bf0b0) at core/forward.c:865 No locals. #6 0x00005613ccc5eea9 in receive_msg ( buf=0x5613cee206f0 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX>;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"..., len=667, rcv_info=0x7fd253b7cad8) at core/receive.c:587 msg = 0x7fd2758bf0b0 ctx = {rec_lev = 0, run_flags = 0, last_retcode = 1, jmp_env = {{__jmpbuf = {0, -5133089566915471019, 0, 140542026919088, 94643042412979, 536870912, -5133089567001454251, -1505551737941960363}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = {__val = {94643073835016, 65535, 17240315422543681536, 18446744073709551536, 2, 0, 140542026919088, 94643042412979, 536870912, 140735803211024, 94643040635195, 140735803211696, 65535, 65536, 4095, 140735803211580}}}}} bctx = 0x0 ret = 1 tvb = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} tve = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} diff = 0 inb = {s = 0x5613cee206f0 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX>;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"..., len = 667} netinfo = {data = {s = 0x5613cee206f0 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"..., len = 667}, rcv = 0x7fd253b7cad8, dst = 0x0} keng = 0x0 evp = {data = 0x7fff9b8eba90, obuf = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, rcv = 0x7fd253b7cad8, dst = 0x0, req = 0x0, rpl = 0x0, rplcode = 0, mode = 0} cidlockidx = 0 cidlockset = 0 errsipmsg = 0 exectime = 0 __func__ = "receive_msg" #7 0x00005613ccd1cf15 in receive_tcp_msg (tcpbuf=0x7fd253b7ce60 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX>;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"..., len=667, rcv_info=0x7fd253b7cad8, con=0x7fd253b7cac0) at core/tcp_read.c:1424 buf = 0x5613cee206f0 "SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here\r\nTo: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX;user=phone>;tag=h7g4Esbg_11002529899813\r\nFrom: <sip:XXXXX@XXXXX>;tag=as6964f29d\r\nCal"... bsize = 65535 blen = 65535 __func__ = "receive_tcp_msg" #8 0x00005613ccd1f554 in tcp_read_req (con=0x7fd253b7cac0, bytes_read=0x7fff9b8ebf34, read_flags=0x7fff9b8ebf3c) at core/tcp_read.c:1607 bytes = 667 total_bytes = 667 resp = 1 size = 0 req = 0x7fd253b7cbe8 dst = {send_sock = 0x7fff9b8ebec0, to = {s = {sa_family = 32062, sa_data = "\303\314\023V\000\000p\276\216\233\377\177\000"}, sin = {sin_family = 32062, sin_port = 52419, sin_addr = {s_addr = 22035}, sin_zero = "p\276\216\233\377\177\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 32062, sin6_port = 52419, sin6_flowinfo = 22035, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "p\276\216\233\377\177\000\000\030\000\000\000\000\000\000", __u6_addr16 = {48752, 39822, 32767, 0, 24, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {2609823344, 32767, 24, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 0}, sas = {ss_family = 32062, __ss_padding = "\303\314\023V\000\000p\276\216\233\377\177\000\000\030", '\000' <repeats 15 times>, "\225q\\\037P\000\000\000\070,\214u\322\177\000\000\000\244\374\314\023V\000\000\000\000\000\000\001 \000\000\070,\214u\322\177\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\300ʷS\322\177\000\000\200\276\216\233\377\177\000\000\070,\214u\322\177\000\000\200\277\216\233\377\177\000\000\b\000\000\000\000\000\000", __ss_align = 20}}, id = 1, send_flags = {f = 1, blst_imask = 0}, proto = 31 '\037', proto_pad0 = 0 '\000', proto_pad1 = 0} c = 49 '1' ret = 0 __func__ = "tcp_read_req" #9 0x00005613ccd23eb4 in handle_io (fm=0x7fd2758c2c38, events=1, idx=-1) at core/tcp_read.c:1857 ret = 0 n = 1404553920 read_flags = RD_CONN_SHORT_READ con = 0x7fd253b7cac0 s = 1404554328 resp = 1 t = 526152085 ee = 0x0 __func__ = "handle_io" #10 0x00005613ccd0dd1e in io_wait_loop_epoll (h=0x5613ccfca240 <io_w>, t=2, repeat=0) at core/io_wait.h:1070 n = 1 r = 0 fm = 0x7fd2758c2c38 revents = 1 __func__ = "io_wait_loop_epoll" #11 0x00005613ccd25981 in tcp_receive_loop (unix_sock=39) at core/tcp_read.c:1978 __func__ = "tcp_receive_loop" #12 0x00005613ccb8561b in tcp_init_children (woneinit=0x7fff9b8ec338) at core/tcp_main.c:5139 r = 2 i = 7 reader_fd_1 = 39 pid = 0 si_desc = "tcp receiver (generic)\000\000\205\220\274\314\023V\000\000\020Î\233\377\177\000\000\301\200\313\314\000\000\000\000AS\000\000\000\000\000\000۸\352\314\023V\000\000\246\000\216\233\377\177\000\000\034\352\340\314\023V\000\000\340\302\216\233\001\000\000\000\360\311\017Q\322\177\000\000\340\302\216\233\377\177\000\000\340\227:S\001\000\000\000\000Î\233\377\177\000\000\274\353\340\314\023V\000" si = 0x0 __func__ = "tcp_init_children" #13 0x00005613cca62bba in main_loop () at main.c:1857 i = 8 pid = 21313 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=7 sock=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060\000\000\000\003\000\000\000 \000\000\000\000\230g\240\210\347A\357\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\210P\347\314\023V\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\260,\227}\322\177\000\000\263i\354\314\023V\000\000\000\000\000 \000\000\000\000\260Ď\233\377\177\000\000\t\205\317\314\023V\000" nrprocs = 8 woneinit = 1 __func__ = "main_loop" #14 0x00005613cca6d4aa in main (argc=17, argv=0x7fff9b8ec9f8) at main.c:3053 cfg_stream = 0x5613cecb6290 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x7fff9b8ecf3f "" tmp_len = 2109797928 port = 32722 proto = 2109962736 ahost = 0x0 aport = 0 options = 0x5613cce77ce0 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" ret = -1 seed = 3769828628 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 0 n_lst = 0x0 p = 0x0 st = {st_dev = 21, st_ino = 17087, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 109, st_gid = 115, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1620845793, tv_nsec = 887985330}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1625090397, tv_nsec = 157181302}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1625090401, tv_nsec = 197141517}, __glibc_reserved = {0, 0, 0}} tbuf = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\b\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\060\207\303}\322\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\240q\237\233\377\177\000\000\364\212\301}\322\177\000\000\b\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\230r\237\233\377\177\000\000\060\207\303}\322\177\000\000\230ǎ\233\377\177\000\000\224ǎ\233\377\177", '\000' <repeats 18 times>, "\230r\237\233\377\177\000\000\250q\237\233\377\177\000\000'\376\237}\322\177\000\000&\260be\000\000\000\000\000Ɏ\233\377\177\000\000\300\212\225\001\000\000\000\000`Ȏ\233\377\177\000\000PȎ\233\377\177\000\000\230ǎ\233\377\177\000\000X\207\303}\322\177\000\000\001", '\000' <repeats 31 times>... option_index = 0 long_options = {{name = 0x5613cce79f3f "help", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 104}, {name = 0x5613cce754e0 "version", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 118}, {name = 0x5613cce79f44 "alias", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1024}, {name = 0x5613cce79f4a "subst", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1025}, {name = 0x5613cce79f50 "substdef", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1026}, {name = 0x5613cce79f59 "substdefs", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1027}, {name = 0x5613cce79f63 "server-id", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1028}, {name = 0x5613cce79f6d "loadmodule", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1029}, {name = 0x5613cce79f78 "modparam", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1030}, {name = 0x5613cce79f81 "log-engine", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1031}, {name = 0x5613cce79f8c "debug", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1032}, {name = 0x5613cce79f92 "cfg-print", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 1033}, {name = 0x5613cce79f9c "atexit", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1034}, {name = 0x0, has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 0}} __func__ = "main"

2 years, 9 months

UAC_AUTH with RTPEngine NAT

by Paul Smith

Hi, [Note I posted this yesterday from the wrong email address.] I am struggling to see why my SDP is not being set correctly on the INVITE to my supplier with Proxy-Authentication when I use uac_auth(). The initial INVITE to my supplier has correct SDP set by rtpengine_manage. Then supplier replies with a 407. My failure route correctly handles the Auth, and also calls NATMANAGE again... but this time the SDP is unchanged and the private IP and original media information from the original device is relayed to my supplier. kamailio.cfg isbased on the default config. Running kamailio 5.4.6 and using example from uac module for uac_auth. My failure route calls NATMANAGE. Is there anything special about uac_auth? Do I need some extra magic to apply the message body changes after I have run rtpengine_manage(). I can see that the NATMANAGEr test for nat_uac_test("8") is true, and rtpengine_manage() s being called. But the outgoing SDP is not changed. Thanks for any hints! Paul ==================== Extract of kamailio.cfg failure_route[TRUNKAUTH] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } route(NATMANAGE); xlog("L_INFO","In failure route, just finshed NATMANAGE and now body is $mb"); if(t_check_status("401|407")) { # $avp(auser) = "test"; # $avp(apass) = "test"; # $avp(apass) = "36d0a02793542b4961e8348347236dbf"; if (uac_auth()) { t_relay(); } exit; } }

2 years, 9 months

UAC_AUTH with RTPEngine NAT

by Paul Smith

Hi, I am struggling to see why my SDP is not being set correctly on the INVITE to my supplier with Proxy-Authentication when I use uac_auth(). The initial INVITE to my supplier has correct SDP set by rtpengine_manage. Then supplier replies with a 407. My failure route correctly handles the Auth, and also calls NATMANAGE again... but this time the SDP is unchanged and the private IP and original media information from the original device is relayed to my supplier. kamailio.cfg isbased on the default config. Running kamailio 5.4.6 and using example from uac module for uac_auth. My failure route calls NATMANAGE. Is there anything special about uac_auth? Do I need some extra magic to apply the message body changes after I have run rtpengine_manage(). ==================== Extract of kamailio.cfg failure_route[TRUNKAUTH] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } route(NATMANAGE); xlog("L_INFO","In failure route, just finshed NATMANAGE and now body is $mb"); if(t_check_status("401|407")) { # $avp(auser) = "test"; # $avp(apass) = "test"; # $avp(apass) = "36d0a02793542b4961e8348347236dbf"; if (uac_auth()) { t_relay(); } exit; } }

2 years, 9 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2021