Hi everybody,
I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This
seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems.
When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are
synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc.
But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty.
Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set?
BR, Björn
--
Björn Klasen, Specialist
TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP)
Projensdorfer Straße 324
24106 Kiel
Germany
T +49 431/ 530530
F +49 431/ 7097-555
mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de
http://www.tng.de
Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI
Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg,
Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert
Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428
Hi All,
I am facing an issue in understanding how the min_se should be working in
kamailio. As per the SST documentation, it seems like if the min_se is
configured as 500, then any value of Session-Expires OR MIN-SE if lower
than 500, can be responded to by a 422.
However, I strangely see the reverse happening. To investigate further, I
looked in to the ki_sst_check_min() code in the master, and these seems
like a potential issue.
Ref Code: Inside ki_sst_check_min(), there is an if condition like below:
if (sst_min_se < MIN(minse, se.interval)) {
However, shouldn't it be the other way around? ie
if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) {
because we need to send 422 if the received value(in INVITE etc) is
smaller than the sst configure min_se value?
I also found a different documentation, at
https://git.sgu.ru/oldssu/ex-opensips/blob/cb9df8d59dbb254a9d862569fd5d11f6…
where
the check is as below?
if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) {
Can someone confirm if this is broken, or my understanding is incorrect?
Regards,
Harneet
--
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how
improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find
> callid-totag (from the response).
>
> I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves
> different.
Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted
to topos-redis.
Hi,
We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon.
Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate !
Thanks,
Andreas
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu
Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
Hi,
which version are you using?
A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote:
Hello,
We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE.
We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.
The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.
But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something?
Kind Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello
I have a Kamailio running behind NAT, which sends calls to a VOIP
service provider.
I have setup the Kamalio to listen on port 5071, and also setup a port
forward in the router.
Now the problem is that with TCP, 5071 is not used for the dialog, but a
new port is chosen everytime. This means that when the mobile phone
called hands up, I never sees the BYE, because BYE is a new dialog.
To which port is the server supposed to send the BYE, and what field
tells the server this.
--
-------------------- Med Liberalistiske Hilsner ----------------------
Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog
Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49
Den ikke akademiske hjemmeside for liberalismen - www.liberalismen.dk
Hello,
I'm on Kamailio 4.4.7 and I'm trying to do uac.reg_refresh over a row
non existing on DB to try to unload, but data still persist on Kamailio.
How to unload only one registry from UACs remote registrations when
delete a record from DB without do a uac.reg_reload?
UAC remote registrations is above 2k rows, I don't know if it's much or not.
Regards, JV
--
Logo <http://www.voiper.es/>
Javier Valencia | CTO
Centro de Negocios Martín Buendía
Camino de las Cañadas, nº 1C, Portal 1, 2ºG
29649 Mijas (Málaga)
# 951562080 (T) <tel:951562080> | 687486759 (M) <tel:687486759>
# www.voiper.es <http://www.voiper.es/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVISO LEGAL
-----------
Este mensaje contiene información confidencial destinada para ser leída
exclusivamente por el destinatario. Queda prohibida la reproducción,
publicación, divulgación, total o parcial del mensaje así como el uso no
autorizados por el emisor. En caso de recibir el mensaje por error, se ruega
su comunicación al remitente lo antes posible. Por favor, indique
inmediatamente si usted o su empresa no aceptan comunicaciones de este tipo
por Internet.
Las opiniones, conclusiones y demás información incluida en este mensaje que
no esté relacionada con asuntos profesionales de SMART RECARGAS, S.L, se
entenderá que nunca se ha dado, ni está respaldado por el mismo.
Responsable del Tratamiento de Datos
------------------------------------
SMART RECARGAS , SL
Camino de las Cañadas, 1C PORTAL 1 2º G
29651 MIJAS COSTA (MALAGA)
Hello,
I'm playing with RPC on my Kamailio 4.4.7, and I getting rare behaivor
with *uac.reg_refresh* command.
When I run it thru kamcmd like docs describes, this is without *l_uuid*
parameter, I'm geting "*error: 500 - Invalid Parameters*" output. And
when I run with *l_uuid* parameter, I get no output. But in both cases,
Kamalio don't refresh data from DB.
But I run this command thru HTTP (JSONRPC-S), both call modes are
equivalent. With or without l_uuid parameter geting no output and
refresh data from DB.
It's a normal behaivor?
Regards, JV
--
Logo <http://www.voiper.es/>
Javier Valencia | CTO
Centro de Negocios Martín Buendía
Camino de las Cañadas, nº 1C, Portal 1, 2ºG
29649 Mijas (Málaga)
# 951562080 (T) <tel:951562080> | 687486759 (M) <tel:687486759>
# www.voiper.es <http://www.voiper.es/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVISO LEGAL
-----------
Este mensaje contiene información confidencial destinada para ser leída
exclusivamente por el destinatario. Queda prohibida la reproducción,
publicación, divulgación, total o parcial del mensaje así como el uso no
autorizados por el emisor. En caso de recibir el mensaje por error, se ruega
su comunicación al remitente lo antes posible. Por favor, indique
inmediatamente si usted o su empresa no aceptan comunicaciones de este tipo
por Internet.
Las opiniones, conclusiones y demás información incluida en este mensaje que
no esté relacionada con asuntos profesionales de SMART RECARGAS, S.L, se
entenderá que nunca se ha dado, ni está respaldado por el mismo.
Responsable del Tratamiento de Datos
------------------------------------
SMART RECARGAS , SL
Camino de las Cañadas, 1C PORTAL 1 2º G
29651 MIJAS COSTA (MALAGA)
Hi there,
I'm using Kamailio 4.4.7 with UAC remote registrations module.
In my database have all rows with expires column value's 3600, and my
PBX (asterisk) min, max and default expires to 3600. But I can see how
Kamailio it's sending REGISTER each 150segs.
UAC module parameters values;
modparam("uac", "reg_db_url", "mysql://XXX")
modparam("uac", "reg_db_table", "uacreg")
modparam("uac", "reg_contact_addr", "XXX")
modparam("uac", "reg_timer_interval", 5)
modparam("uac", "reg_retry_interval", 60)
My uacreg table it's above 2k rows.
Regards, JV
--
Logo <http://www.voiper.es/>
Javier Valencia | CTO
Centro de Negocios Martín Buendía
Camino de las Cañadas, nº 1C, Portal 1, 2ºG
29649 Mijas (Málaga)
# 951562080 (T) <tel:951562080> | 687486759 (M) <tel:687486759>
# www.voiper.es <http://www.voiper.es/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVISO LEGAL
-----------
Este mensaje contiene información confidencial destinada para ser leída
exclusivamente por el destinatario. Queda prohibida la reproducción,
publicación, divulgación, total o parcial del mensaje así como el uso no
autorizados por el emisor. En caso de recibir el mensaje por error, se ruega
su comunicación al remitente lo antes posible. Por favor, indique
inmediatamente si usted o su empresa no aceptan comunicaciones de este tipo
por Internet.
Las opiniones, conclusiones y demás información incluida en este mensaje que
no esté relacionada con asuntos profesionales de SMART RECARGAS, S.L, se
entenderá que nunca se ha dado, ni está respaldado por el mismo.
Responsable del Tratamiento de Datos
------------------------------------
SMART RECARGAS , SL
Camino de las Cañadas, 1C PORTAL 1 2º G
29651 MIJAS COSTA (MALAGA)
My use case is such that I want to be able to send a SIP MESSAGE destined
for a single username to multiple users. In order to be able to map that
target username to multiple usernames, I tried using rtjson and evapi/http
(to generate the routing json), but none of them worked.
Is it the right approach? Is there any other way to programmatically
generate multiple targets for SIP request? I am familiar with dynamic
routing but I need more flexibility.
Initially, I tried sending the request to a different username but that
didn't work and got the following message in the http async result route.
kamailio | 19(25) ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:1461]: sdp_1918():
Unable to parse sdp body
kamailio | 19(25) NOTICE: <core> [core/kemi.c:124]:
sr_kemi_core_notice(): In evapi msg branch
kamailio | 28(34) NOTICE: {2 6661 MESSAGE q6hikd6tumsr1dh35kvj} <core>
[core/kemi.c:124]: sr_kemi_core_notice(): In evapi reply branch
The message was received on the originally requested to user and also $tu still
points to the original user instead of the new user even after executing
the following code.
KSR.rtjson.init_routes(response);
KSR.rtjson.push_routes();
KSR.nathelper.fix_nated_contact();
In http response, I receive the following and don't see any rtjson errors
when init_routes is executed on it.
{"version":"1.0","routing":"parallel","routes":[{"headers":{"from":{"display":"test_1","uri":"sip:
*test_1*@test.com:9908"},"to":{"display":"test_4","uri":"sip:*test_4*@
test.com:9908
"},"extra":""},"branch_flags":8,"fr_timer":5000,"fr_inv_timer":30000}]}
Please note that the request was sent to *test_2*(a)test.com. I have tried
other combinations of above but nothing works.
I have already searched on Google and read relevant articles and blog
posts.
Thanks
--
--
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender
immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete
this email from your system. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender,
therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. If
verification is required, please request a hard-copy version.
