I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly
deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are
confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way
for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like
advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead.
(With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio
and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails
because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP
transport).
BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy
as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.
Hi everybody,
I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This
seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems.
When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are
synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc.
But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty.
Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set?
BR, Björn
--
Björn Klasen, Specialist
TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP)
Projensdorfer Straße 324
24106 Kiel
Germany
T +49 431/ 530530
F +49 431/ 7097-555
mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de
http://www.tng.de
Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI
Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg,
Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert
Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428
Hello,
When writing kemi cfg (python in my case), is there any way to get rid of standard cfg shared variables and use kemi cfg variables instead?
E.g. Instead of $shv(blabla) (in standard config) can I use some global python var called 'blabla'? Is it seen and shared by all kamailio processes? Or I still need to use KSR.pv.get/set("$shv(blabla)") ?
Thank you,
Stefan
Hello all,
I'm using Kamailio as SIP redirect where I'm appending the contact header then send reply back using sl_send_reply("300","Multiple Choices").
But I'm getting "print_dset(): no r-uri or branches" as warning in the log and no packet is sent back from Kamailio to the original sender.
I'm using same Kamailio configuration in another setup and it's working correctly without facing this error.
I'm not able to detect the issue. Can you please assist?
Regards,
Hello.
I have some rant with network security dept. Is there some standard, RFC,
what port range should be used for RTP traffic, how RTP ports are selected
during SIP call negotiation?
Thanks.
Hello,
Any idea about the crash below? I found a ticket regarding to this, I made some comments and backtraces there also:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3635
Now this crash is very frequently, 3-4 times every day. There is a timer mechnism, where kamailio refreshes registrations towards asterisk automically to ensure continuous availability for mobile users.
The crash exists 3-5 secs after this refresh process, but not always. Sometimes this process runs fine only CRITICAL logs appears (mentioned below) after it, but sometimes kamailio crashes during writing these CRITICAL logs.
Peter
From: Dr. Barabás Péter via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, 2023. November 15. 17:03
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Dr. Barabás Péter <dr.peter.barabas(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: uac_req_send + evroute + crash
Hello Daniel,
I’m using kamailio 5.7.2 currently and this misterious crash occurs again. Now core files are generated also, here is the trace:
(gdb) bt
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x00007fae9a2d0859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x00005614ad79afd8 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=0x7fae78e77000, f=0x7fae79805028, file=0x7fae77c8c134 "uac: uac_send.c", line=860, efile=0x5614ad936f99 "core/mem/q_malloc.c", eline=511) at core/mem/q_malloc.c:129
#3 0x00005614ad79f7c1 in qm_free (qmp=0x7fae78e77000, p=0x7fae79805060, file=0x7fae77c8c134 "uac: uac_send.c", func=0x7fae77c8cf10 <__func__.15157> "uac_send_tm_callback", line=860, mname=0x7fae77c8c014 "uac") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:511
#4 0x00005614ad7ab410 in qm_shm_free (qmp=0x7fae78e77000, p=0x7fae79805060, file=0x7fae77c8c134 "uac: uac_send.c", func=0x7fae77c8cf10 <__func__.15157> "uac_send_tm_callback", line=860, mname=0x7fae77c8c014 "uac") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1350
#5 0x00007fae77c3686b in uac_send_tm_callback (t=0x7fae797dcf40, type=131072, ps=0x7fff8bd990d0) at uac_send.c:860
#6 0x00007fae783abc27 in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0x7fae797dcfe8, type=131072, trans=0x7fae797dcf40, params=0x7fff8bd990d0) at t_hooks.c:241
#7 0x00007fae783abd1e in run_trans_callbacks (type=131072, trans=0x7fae797dcf40, req=0x0, rpl=0x0, code=0) at t_hooks.c:261
#8 0x00007fae782bd8cb in free_cell_helper (dead_cell=0x7fae797dcf40, silent=0, fname=0x7fae783e9f62 "timer.c", fline=653) at h_table.c:165
#9 0x00007fae7837649c in wait_handler (ti=724701450, wait_tl=0x7fae797dcff8, data=0x7fae797dcf40) at timer.c:653
#10 0x00005614ad50be68 in timer_list_expire (t=724701450, h=0x7fae78ef5d18, slow_l=0x7fae78ef95e0, slow_mark=33641) at core/timer.c:857
#11 0x00005614ad50c3a7 in timer_handler () at core/timer.c:922
#12 0x00005614ad50c8d5 in timer_main () at core/timer.c:961
#13 0x00005614ad45fbf3 in main_loop () at main.c:1833
#14 0x00005614ad46ae93 in main (argc=14, argv=0x7fff8bd99b48) at main.c:3086
I think it occurs only if $uac_req(evroute) is set to 1 and I define the event_route[uac:reply] route.
My uac_reply route is easy:
if ($uac_req(evcode)==200) {
xlog("L_INFO", "Registration for user $fU has been refreshed successfully.");
$sht(vtp=>asterisk_restarted) = $null;
route(SAVE_REG);
}
else {
xlog("L_INFO", "Registration failed: $uac_req(evcode)");
}
the SAVE_REG route is the following:
route[SAVE_REG] {
xlog("L_INFO", "Saving pbx registration...:$fU");
$var(maxExpiry) = MAX_PBX_REG_EXPIRY;
route(GET_CLIENT_ID);
sql_pvquery("ca", "select count(*) from pbxusers where user = '$fU'", "$var(pbxusersCnt)");
if ($var(pbxusersCnt)>0) {
if ($var(clientId) == 0) {
sql_query("ca", "update pbxusers set expiry = TIMESTAMPADD(SECOND, $var(maxExpiry), SYSDATE()), online=1 where user = '$fU'");
}
else {
sql_query("ca", "update pbxusers set client_id = '$var(clientId)', expiry = TIMESTAMPADD(SECOND, $var(maxExpiry), SYSDATE()), online=1 where user = '$fU'");
}
}
else {
sql_query("ca", "insert into pbxusers (user, expiry, client_id, online) values ('$fU', TIMESTAMPADD(SECOND, $var(maxExpiry), SYSDATE()), '$var(clientId)', 0)");
}
}
And GET_CLIENT_ID route is:
route[GET_CLIENT_ID] {
$var(clientId) = 0;
if (is_present_hf("X-AT-ClientId")) {
$var(clientId) = $hdr(X-AT-ClientId);
}
}
Any idea, is it a bug or I do something wrong in config files?
Peter
From: Dr. Barabás Péter via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Sunday, 2023. October 8. 18:49
To: miconda(a)gmail.com <miconda(a)gmail.com>, Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Dr. Barabás Péter <dr.peter.barabas(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: uac_req_send + evroute + crash
Hello Daniel,
I do not see any “failed to send request with authentication”.
The next CRITICAL log appears after calling uac_req_send():
CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f114995ada8), called from uac: uac_send.c: uac_send_tm_callback(860), first free uac: uac_send.c: uac_resend_tm_callback(732) - ignoring
Now we use kamailio 5.7.2 and no crash has come, but the critical logs above exist.
I saw a ticket in github: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3522, may the crash be similar or the same to that?
I will make a try next week with downgrading to 5.6.2 and try to reproduce the crash.
Peter
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 2023. October 6. 13:55
To: Dr. Barabás Péter <dr.peter.barabas(a)gmail.com>, Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] uac_req_send + evroute + crash
Hello,
do you also get error log messages that include "failed to send request with authentication"?
Which CRITICAL log appears when you call uac_req_send()? You pasted a couple of them in the initial email?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05.10.23 17:32, Dr. Barabás Péter wrote:
Hello,
I used kamailio version 5.6.2. I refreshed to 5.7.2 today.
As I remember it was in kamailio long time ago therefore I could skip evroute route.
But this CRITICAL log appears always when I call uac_req_send().
I call it with settings:
$uac_req(auser) = $var(username);
$uac_req(apasswd) = $var(password);
Where username and password are retrived from web service before call.
In event_route I got first 401 after 200.
Peter
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 2023. October 5. 17:25
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Dr. Barabás Péter <dr.peter.barabas(a)gmail.com><mailto:dr.peter.barabas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] uac_req_send + evroute + crash
Hello,
On 05.10.23 16:34, Dr. Barabás Péter via sr-users wrote:
Hi All,
I use kamailio In front of Asterisk and kamailio needs to refresh registrations periodically towards Asterisk to ensure the availability of users from Asterisk side.
I use uac module and call uac_req_send() for sending REGISTER requests.
I set $uac_req(evroute)=1
The event_route[uac:reply] is called fine, but in kamailio logs I see the next lines:
CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f114995ada8), called from uac: uac_send.c: uac_send_tm_callback(860), first free uac: uac_send.c: uac_resend_tm_callback(732) - ignoring
After some time, kamailio has crashed.
CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f114995ada8), called from uac: uac_send.c: uac_send_tm_callback(860), first free uac: uac_send.c: uac_resend_tm_callback(732) – ignoring
CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 34
ALERT: <core> [main.c:774]: handle_sigs(): child process 1407950 exited by a signal 6
what version of Kamailio are you using? Is Asterisk challenging for authentication?
Does it happen every time or seldom?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online - Nov 14-16, 2023 -- asipto.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online - Nov 14-16, 2023 -- asipto.com
Hi champs,
In this flow like endpoint -> B2BUA 1-> kamailio -> B2BUA 2, there is a
requirement that REFER should be handled by Kamailio and it should manage
the transfer , initiating a new invite based on REFER.
Any pointer will be helpful
--
Danish
Hello,
I'm using the Kamailio version 5.7.x, I didn't find in the module "enum.so" any option that allow to connect to a remote ENUM server.
Could you please help me !
Thanks in advance
Kamailio project continued to evolve steadily, a new major release was
out during this year, next one planned in a few months, relying on an
amazing community of developers and users. We hope it kept helping
people and companies world wide to connect with the dear ones and build
a better way of living.
The season holidays are ahead, time to relax, spend time with family and
friends! I take again this chance to express my thanks and greetings to
all the friends, developers, supporting companies and community members
that made 2023 another fantastic year for Kamailio project.
Enjoy the holidays! Merry Christmas!
Daniel
* Santa is flying Kamailio! *
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services
Kamailio World Conference - April 18-19, 2024, Berlin
hi,
trying kamailio 5.7.3 with KEMI pythons3s
sample from
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/misc/examples/kemi/kamaili…
trying simple register with sipsak
sipsak -U --sip-uri "sip:cervajs@kamailio.example.com" -u cervajs -a
top_secret
4(28805) ERROR: PY8 {REGISTER}: app_python3s [apy3s_kemi.c:141]:
apy3s_exec_func(): error exception occurred
4(28805) ERROR: PY8 {REGISTER}: app_python3s [apy3s_exception.c:167]:
apy3s_handle_exception(): apy3s_exec_func: ksr_request_route((null)):
Unhandled exception in the Python code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/etc/kamailio/kamailio.py", line 31, in ksr_request_route
if ksr_route_natdetect()==-255 :
File "/etc/kamailio/kamailio.py", line 238, in ksr_route_natdetect
if KSR.nathelper.nat_uac_test(19)>0 :
AttributeError: module 'KSR' has no attribute 'nathelper'
i see nat_uac_test in doc
https://kamailio.org/docs/tutorials/5.7.x/kamailio-kemi-framework/modules/#…
any tips/ideas?
happy christmas
Marek
