On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find
> callid-totag (from the response).
>
> I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves
> different.
Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted
to topos-redis.
Hi,
We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon.
Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate !
Thanks,
Andreas
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu
Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
Hi,
which version are you using?
A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote:
Hello,
We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE.
We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.
The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.
But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something?
Kind Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello
I have a Kamailio running behind NAT, which sends calls to a VOIP
service provider.
I have setup the Kamalio to listen on port 5071, and also setup a port
forward in the router.
Now the problem is that with TCP, 5071 is not used for the dialog, but a
new port is chosen everytime. This means that when the mobile phone
called hands up, I never sees the BYE, because BYE is a new dialog.
To which port is the server supposed to send the BYE, and what field
tells the server this.
--
-------------------- Med Liberalistiske Hilsner ----------------------
Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog
Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49
Den ikke akademiske hjemmeside for liberalismen - www.liberalismen.dk
Hello,
Does anybody has used with success the reginfo modules ?
I added lines bellow in configuration, and tried different variations,
Even if my subscribe for "reginfo" events is accepted (with 202 OK), I
receive no notification when respective user registers.
Nor do I get the xml body in the first notification.
Added in my config:
loadmodule "presence_reginfo.so"
loadmodule "pua_reginfo.so"
modparam("pua_reginfo", "default_domain", "192.168.60.65")
modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:reginfo@192.168.60.65")
modparam("pua_reginfo", "publish_reginfo", 1)
Thank you in advance,
Adrian
Well, I saw similar questions in the list already but looks like nobody has
answer.
Please look at REFER below.
Kamilio get REFER from MS and sends it to FS node. Next, FS node try to
make 3th call for some reason.I expect that FS will not do 3th call and
just will connect Alice and Bob itself.
2020/05/14 12:32:00.637027 KAM_IP:5060 -> FS_IP:5060
REFER sip:Alice_number@FS_IP:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0
FROM: Customer1<sip:MS_TRUNK_NUMBER@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061
;user=phone>;tag=a860c50a3fb54d08b4e5740fa2dfb3d6
TO: <sip:Alice_number@FQDN_OF_TRUNK:5061>;user=phone;tag=e8ct9S6ty13va
CSEQ: 4 REFER
CALL-ID: 2c71b2a6669b5343a231e1244b19c945
MAX-FORWARDS: 50
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
FQDN_OF_TRUNK:5060;branch=z9hG4bK10ae.2c42897feca117121a23bf0c8d54cd19.0;i=c
VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.75.24:5061;branch=z9hG4bK7e3e8998
CONTACT: <sip:api-du-a-euwe.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443
;x-i=6b68e7aa-f5e2-44ec-9edf-0bacbabfce07;x-c=2c71b2a6669b5343a231e1244b19c945/d/8/b68f86794a8e44d19543f8edbee6b2fc
CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
REFER-TO: <sip:Bob_number@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061
;user=phone;transport=tls>
REFERRED-BY: <sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061
;x-m=8:orgid:21bc47d3-c050-4292-8234-46f7005b97aa;x-t=fb788ef8-3c4c-455a-8d62-f3c20832c0d3;x-ti=6b68e7aa-f5e2-44ec-9edf-
acbabfce07;x-tt=aHR0cHM6Ly9hcGktZHUtYS1ldXdlLnBzdG5odWIubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS92MS9uZ2MvY2FsbG5vdGlmaWNhdGlvbj9kY2k9YzIxMjE3MzEyNTQ2NDk1ZjlhYTcwODliYTkwNGIxZGQ%3D>
USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.5.6.2 i.EUWE.4
ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY
P-ASSERTED-IDENTITY: <tel:MS_TRUNK_NUMBER>,<
sip:customer1@m365x587912.onmicrosoft.com>
PRIVACY: id
X-AUTH-IP: 52.114.75.24
X-AUTH-PORT: 3136
Any advice?
Hi,
I want to remove some "Allow" features from my Kamailio SBC like I want to keep following only
Allow: OPTIONS, NOTIFY, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER,
How can I achieve that?
Thanks,
Thanks for the link.
One issue I've noticed:
If you have an empty comment line (just # on a single line), then the next line is wrongly highlighted as comments.
For example:
#
loadmodule "db_postgres.so"
> i'm using https://github.com/miconda/vscode-kamailio-syntax in VScode.
> its great!
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
Hi,
I am having a problem on fail overing my master kamailio server and slave
kamailio server.
I use kamailio as a load balancer for my asterisk servers. And it is
working with calls, but when I added failover with keepalived to the slave,
there is no audio during calls.
Thank you,
Rolly
Hello,
I have a kamailio server running behind HAProxy with proxy protocol v2 enabled.
In Kamailio I have set the parameter tcp_accept_haproxy=yes and loaded tcpops module.
UEs are registered using TLS and kamailio sees that the message has received from their real ip address + port and not HAProxy ip + port.
When UE A calls UE B, kamailio is trying to reach UE B using his real ip address and port instead of HAProxy IP address + port.
I know I can get the tcp ip and port of HAProxy using $tcp(c_si) and $tcp(c_sp) but I can’t make it work.
What is the right way to do this? How should I use these variables properly in order to establish the call successfully?
Thanks,
Joey.
