On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find
> callid-totag (from the response).
>
> I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves
> different.
Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted
to topos-redis.
Hi,
We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon.
Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate !
Thanks,
Andreas
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu
Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
Hi,
which version are you using?
A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote:
Hello,
We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE.
We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.
The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.
But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something?
Kind Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi everyone,
I've got a specific case: when the inv_fr times out, I need to add a Reason
header to the CANCEL generated by kamailio. I've tried to see if I could do
it in the onsend_route, but that one is not triggered for the generated
CANCEL. I also checked event_route[tm:local-request], but that one isn't
triggered either for the generated CANCEL.
Is there any way to do it? Or maybe to have any pointer about where to look
in the code so I may try to trigger event_route[tm:local-request] for these
generated CANCELs?
Regards,
Alfonso
hi,
I have a Kamailio setup infront of a SIP system that do not handle cancellation of a INVITE correctly.
The system sends out a BYE request instead of a Cancel request on non connected dialogs.
I am trying to find a way to let Kamailio "translate" the BYE request to a Cancel reqeust for the ongoing INVITE dialog.
Alternative if SEMS b2bua can do it, but currently it replies: "not sip-relaying BYE in not connected dlg", and I have not found any obvious way to rewrite it there.
Any thoughts. I can not change the behavior of the remote system.
Best Regards,
Lars
When receiving an INVITE over a specific LTE carrier, I'm seeing 'c=IN IP4
192.0.0.4' in SDP, which isn't technically a RFC1918 or RFC6598 IP address
and thus nat_uac_test(8) fails.
What elegant workaround can be done to catch such specific cases?
Thanks.
Hi
I have a kamailio 5.1.2 as load balancer and registration offloading,
but I have a problem with the max tcp connections that it can handle.
I suspect that is a linux limit, but I don't find the reason or config.
When that limit arrives, I can't connect to kamailio and I receive
"Connection reset by peer", but I can't view any error message in the
logs.
If I check the connections in kamailio, I view that it have "free" connections:
# kamctl kamcmd core.tcp_info
{
readers: 8
max_connections: 4096
max_tls_connections: 2048
opened_connections: 2655
opened_tls_connections: 0
write_queued_bytes: 0
}
I have this configs in kamailio.conf (related to tcp)
disable_tcp=no
tcp_connection_lifetime=3610
tcp_connect_timeout=5
tcp_crlf_ping=yes
tcp_accept_aliases=no
tcp_keepalive=yes
tcp_keepidle=5
tcp_rd_buf_size=65536
tcp_conn_wq_max=131072
mlock_pages=yes
shm_force_alloc=yes
tcp_max_connections=4096
The shm memory to 256 and the pkg memory to 32.
And, following this doc:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/doc/tutorials/tcp_tunning.…
I have setted this values:
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1024 65535
net.core.somaxconn = 65535
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 182757
Also, I had checked the limits for the main process pid:
Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units
Max cpu time unlimited unlimited seconds
Max file size unlimited unlimited bytes
Max data size unlimited unlimited bytes
Max stack size 8388608 unlimited bytes
Max core file size unlimited unlimited bytes
Max resident set unlimited unlimited bytes
Max processes unlimited unlimited processes
Max open files 1048576 1048576 files
Max locked memory 16777216 16777216 bytes
Max address space unlimited unlimited bytes
Max file locks unlimited unlimited locks
Max pending signals 386297 386297 signals
Max msgqueue size 819200 819200 bytes
Max nice priority 0 0
Max realtime priority 0 0
Max realtime timeout unlimited unlimited us
The service is running inside a lxc container, without any resource
limit, connected to the outside word throught macvlan interface.
Where can I find problem source?
Best regards
Hello,
I'm using RTPproxy for the first time in bridged mode and I can't get kamailio/rtpproxy to rewrite the c parameter to the correct public ip address of kamailio.
The setup is as following:
Carrier ------[fiber]------ Kamailio ---------[lan]--------- Freeswitch
Kamailio is listening on two interfaces:
1) Private: 172.0.0.1
2) Public: 192.168.0.1 (since we have a dedicated fiber with our carrier, this is its public address)
Freeswitch is listening on:
1) 172.0.0.2
Carrier is on:
1) 10.0.0.1
I've started an rtpproxy instance on the Kamailio box using:
rtpproxy -s udp:127.0.0.1:7721 -u rtpproxy rtpproxy -p /var/run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -l 192.168.0.1 172.0.0.1
I've played around with rtpproxy_manage() and the various flags (ie, ei), but I can't get kamailio to set the correct public IP when the 200 OK has to be sent back to the carrier.
It always sets it to its private address, instead of its public address.
I'm using Kamailio 4.2 with sippy/rtpproxy 2.0.
Could someone please point me into the right direction?
Thanks!
Grant
Hi,
With Asterisk, we are able to get some peer round-trip connection statistic by setting qualify=yes for the specified peer.
It sends periodic OPTIONS to the peer and calculates the time round trip time.
It's something like - "Status: OK (30 ms)".
Is there any way to achieve this in Kamailio by using nathelper module, or any other?
Thank you.
Hi all,
I'm using pipelimit with the "clean_unused" option to get rid of pipes that
are not used for quite some time. At the same time we are monitoring
pipelimit with a jsonrpc call similar to:
# curl --header 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary '{"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "pl.list", "params": ["pipe_INVITE"]'
http://127.0.0.1:8000/RPC
Reply:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "Unknown pipe id pipe_INVITE"
},
"id": 1
}
The above reply is valid because the pipe_INVITE was not loaded yet, but
the request makes kamailio to log the following log messages:
Jan 20 11:21:48 proxy1 kamailio[24474]: ERROR: pipelimit [pl_ht.c:519]:
rpc_pl_list(): no pipe: pipe_INVITE
Jan 20 11:21:48 proxy1 kamailio[24474]: ERROR: <core>
[core/parser/parse_fline.c:262]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad
message (offset: 20)
Jan 20 11:21:48 proxy1 kamailio[24474]: [466B blob data]
Since the monitoring system does periodic requests, those log lines get a
bit annoying and fill the log with ERROR messages that aren't really errors.
IMHO the first log line should be converted to DEBUG instead of ERROR, but
I have some doubts about the one from parse_fline.c:262. parse_first_line()
is used to process both SIP and HTTP. It makes sense to log ERROR if SIP
but not in the case of HTTP...
Regarding the "[466B blob data]" I really don't know from where it's coming
from.
I can submit a PR, but I would like to have first some feedback from you.
Thank you,
Nuno
--
*Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any
attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or
any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the
contents to any other person. Thank you.*
