sr-users July 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

54 participants
51 discussions

Integration with multiple MS Teams instances

by Володимир Іванець

Hello all! I was able to connect Kamailio with MS Teams and now trying to add one more Teams instance. It looks like I have some misconfiguration or there is a bug. My test server has 2 domain records pointing at it (kamailio.domain1.com and kamailio.domain2.com). My tls.cfg configuration file looks like this. As you can see the Default section is configured with a kamailio.domain1.com sertificate: *[server:default]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem>* *[client:default]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem>* *[server:172.16.30.206:5062 <http://172.16.30.206:5062>]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem>* *server_name = "kamailio.domain1.com <http://kamailio.domain1.com>"* *server_id = "**"kamailio.domain1.com <http://kamailio.domain1.com>"* *[client:172.16.30.206:5062 <http://172.16.30.206:5062>]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain1.com/CA/cert.pem>* *[server:172.16.30.206:5063 <http://172.16.30.206:5063>]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/CA/cert.pem>* *server_name = "kamailio.domain2.com <http://kamailio.domain2.com>"* *server_id = "**"kamailio.domain2.com <http://kamailio.domain2.com>"* *[client:172.16.30.206:5063 <http://172.16.30.206:5063>]* *method = TLSv1.0+* *require_certificate = no* *verify_certificate = no* *private_key = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/server/key.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/server/key.pem>* *certificate = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/server/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/server/cert.pem>* *ca_list = /var/kamailio/certificates/kamailio.domain2.com/CA/cert.pem <http://kamailio.domain2.com/CA/cert.pem>* The dispatcher configuration table looks like this: +----+-------+----------------------------------------------+-------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+ | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | description | +----+-------+----------------------------------------------+-------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+ | 1 | 1 | sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls | 0 | 3 | socket=tls:172.16.30.206:5062;ping_from=sip:kamailio.domain1.com | MS Teams 1 | | 2 | 2 | sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls | 0 | 3 | socket=tls:172.16.30.206:5063;ping_from=sip:kamailio.domain2.com | MS Teams 2 | +----+-------+----------------------------------------------+-------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+ When Kamailio is started only connection with the first trunk is established: *# kamcmd tls.list* *{* * id: 1* * timeout: 0* * src_ip: 52.114.75.24* * src_port: 5061* * dst_ip: 172.16.30.206* * dst_port: 0* * cipher: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 TLSv1.2 Kx=ECDH Au=RSA Enc=AESGCM(256) Mac=AEAD* * ct_wq_size: 0* * enc_rd_buf: 0* * flags: 2* * state: established* *}* *{* * id: 2* * timeout: 0* * src_ip: 52.114.75.24* * src_port: 7810* * dst_ip: 172.16.30.206* * dst_port: 5062* * cipher: AES256-GCM-SHA384 TLSv1.2 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AESGCM(256) Mac=AEAD* * ct_wq_size: 0* * enc_rd_buf: 0* * flags: 2* * state: established* *}* *{* * id: 3* * timeout: 596* * src_ip: 52.114.75.24* * src_port: 7811* * dst_ip: 172.16.30.206* * dst_port: 5062* * cipher: AES256-GCM-SHA384 TLSv1.2 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AESGCM(256) Mac=AEAD* * ct_wq_size: 0* * enc_rd_buf: 0* * flags: 2* * state: established* *}* Here is what I can see in Kamailio log file when it sends an OPTIONS request to the second trunk. Kamailio uses Default tls configuration and MS Teams don't accept it: *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: ALERT: <script>: == TRACE. tm:local-request. fs is tls:172.16.30.206:5063 <http://172.16.30.206:5063>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:352]: t_run_local_req(): apply new updates without Via to sip msg* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1796]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): method: <OPTIONS>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK169b.6411b4c3000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this is the first via* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [47]; uri=[sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls]* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to body (47)[<sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls>^M* *], to tag (0)[]* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <10> <OPTIONS>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:185]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=0* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): method: <OPTIONS>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK169b.6411b4c3000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this is the first via* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [47]; uri=[sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls]* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to body (47)[<sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com <http://sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com>;transport=tls>^M* *], to tag (0)[]* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <10> <OPTIONS>* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:189]: uac_refresh_hdr_shortcuts(): cseq: [CSeq: 10]* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1993]: tcp_send(): no open tcp connection found, opening new one* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/ip_addr.c:229]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 52.114.75.24* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1175]: tcpconn_new(): on port 5061, type 3, socket -1* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1498]: tcpconn_add(): hashes: 2831:67:0, 1* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:199]: tls_complete_init(): completing tls connection initialization* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:162]: tls_get_connect_server_name(): xavp with outbound server name not found* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:142]: tls_get_connect_server_id(): xavp with outbound server id not found* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:228]: tls_complete_init(): Using initial TLS domain TLSc<default> (dom 0x7f35509da688 ctx 0x7f3550b7a568 sn [])* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:1177]: tls_lookup_private_key(): Private key lookup for SSL_CTX-0x7f3550b7a568: (nil)* *Jul 29 16:46:14 kamailio /usr/sbin/kamailio[11809]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:747]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started* *...* If I change the Default configuration to use kamailio.domain2.com certificate, the second trunk will connect but the first one will fail. I tried to set "$xavp(tls=>server_name)" and "$xavp(tls[0]=>server_id)" variables to the event_route[tm:local-request] section but log still stated that server Name and ID were not found. Can someone please point me in the right direction, how can I make Kamailio use the correct certificates when establishing multiple TLS connections? Thanks a lot! Regards, Volodymyr Ivanets

2 years, 8 months

help

by Said Hassani

Dear Team, I would like to know how to link Kamailio with openIMSCore?I would like to use Kamailio as an Application server.Please guide me or if there is someone who has worked on this subject, I would like to benefit from his help.

2 years, 8 months

which is better for B2BUA

by Mojtaba

Hello there, According to , https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-March/092058.html, which talked about B2BUA (just signalling) in Kamailio. As i have experienced working with SEMS, freeswitch and Kamailio while using B2BUA feature, Each of them have pros and cons: 1- The sems is a light sip engine server with several applications (like as sbc) for using b2bua. All incoming and outgoing calls could go to sems server for doing b2bua like this: Incoming<=======>Kamailio<========>Sems<========>Kamailio<=======>outgoing 2- In sems, you could disable rtp realying. It forces sems to work just as b2bua without anchoring RTP 3- Easy to use different active profiles in routing. Just a couple of things there are in SEMS. For example, the sems adds itself (local IP) in Via header, and it couldn't be common in b2bua. like this: . . . INVITE sip:200@cloud.domain.com;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.200;branch=z9hG4bK2f53.07a3fd9edaa8c8d609ab2ac6b01a087f.0 *================================>Kamailio public IP* *Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKsPRMNast;rport=5080 ===============================>private loopback sems ip* From: <sip:100@cloud.domain.com ;transport=UDP>;tag=6FFDB493-60EABB3600016ECD-379F9700 To: <sip:200@cloud.domain.com;transport=UDP> CSeq: 10 INVITE Call-ID: Y2M1ODQxNTZmMjdkZWZjN2U5MmMyYjBmN2Y2OGY1ODQ._leg2 Route: <sip:mo@127.0.0.1:5060;lr> Max-Forwards: 69 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: Z 3.3.25608 r25552 Content-Type: application/sdp Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5080;transport=udp> Content-Length: 246 . . . For this reason, Is there a way to avoid this issue? I know it is possible to do this by using other modules like textops and retransformation ? And why in Kamailio, there is no b2bua module to perform all b2bua functionality, yet? Thanks with Best Regards. -- --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

2 years, 8 months

How to unload previously loaded destinations in the case of applying multiple ds_select_domain

by Serdar GÜÇLÜER

Hello all, I have a trouble that is related to the way of usage of dispatcher module. I am working with Kamailio 5.3.2 and using dispatcher module as load balancer to route calls to the media gateways. My dispatching routes are below as simply, route[DISPATCH] { if(ds_select_domain("2", "4")) { route(MYRELAY); } else { send_reply("503","Service Unavailable - No MGW"); exit; } } route[MYRELAY] { t_on_failure("MYFAILURE"); if(!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } failure_route[MYFAILURE] { route(NATMANAGE); revert_uri(); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if ($T_reply_code == 408 || $T_reply_code == 503) { if(ds_next_domain()) { route(MYRELAY); } else { send_reply("503","Service Unavailable"); exit; } } else { if(ds_select_domain("6", "4")) { route(MYVMRELAY); } else { send_reply(486,"Busy"); exit; } } } route[MYVMRELAY] { t_on_failure("MYVMFAILURE"); if(!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } failure_route[MYVMFAILURE] { route(NATMANAGE); revert_uri(); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if(ds_next_domain()) { route(MYVMRELAY); } else { send_reply("503","Service Unavailable"); exit; } } I have multiple media gateways(setid=2) and voicemail servers(setid=6). As can be seen from the configuration, after first routing, for transaction reply code except 408 or 503, I am routing call to the voicemail server using dispatcher. In that phase, dispatcher module is remembering previously loaded destinations that come from first ds_select_domain and module try to route these destinations in the case that all voicemail servers are unavailable. So basically, I want to unload all destinations comes from previous ds_select_domain. From the documentation, i tried ds_load_update and ds_load_unset methods but not worked for me. Is there any way to overcome that problem or any right usages of these methods. Thank you, Serdar

2 years, 8 months

Access via script to location data in the memory

by Social Boh

Hello List, is there a way to access location data from kamailio script? I mean data I can see with the command: kamctl ul show Regards -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe

2 years, 8 months

Guidelines on E164 conversions

by Melissa Frasik

Hi all, I'm running into some issues with E164 conversions and was wondering if there was a decent standardized method for conversions. Conversions using $rU seem to be working great, but $fU is behaving badly. This is what I have so far: xlog("$ci - caller id was $avp(src=>callerid)"); if($avp(src=>callerid) =~ "^\+"){ xlog("$ci - caller id already E164"); }else if($(rU{s.substr,0,$(avp(src=>countrycode){s.len})}) == $avp(src=>countrycode)){ $avp(src=>callerid) = "+" + $avp(src=>callerid); $fU = $avp(src=>callerid); $avp(uacreplacefromdisplay) = $fU; $avp(uacreplacefromuri) = $fu; xlog("$ci - Adding plus to make caller id e164"); }else{ $fU = "+" + $avp(src=>countrycode) + $fU; $avp(uacreplacefromdisplay) = $fU; $avp(uacreplacefromuri) = $fu; xlog("$ci - converting domestic caller id number to $fU ($fu) - $avp(uacreplacefromdisplay) $avp(uacreplacefromuri)"); } Previously, I'd found a suggestion mentioning using uac_replace_from in the route[RELAY] (which is the purpose of the uacreplacefrom avps), but $fU does not appear to be changing its value. Is there something I'm doing incorrectly?

2 years, 8 months

How to unload previously loaded destinations in the case of applying multiple ds_select_domain

by Serdar GÜÇLÜER

2 years, 8 months

Setting up uacreg

by Duncan Turnbull

Hi there I am a new user of Kamailio and we are trying to use it to be as a front end for our asterisk pbx. We are running on Ubuntu 18.04 and Kamailio 5.3.8 with Siremis Rather than proxying the request through to asterisk we are trying to use uacreg to send a login to asterisk. Asterisk will think all the users are appear from the proxy but thats okay. Initially this is just for external users but eventually all phones etc will register via Kamailio and we will have the trunks there (and split them across another kamailio but thats another job) If I add a user to the uacreg then when I register to Kamailio it sends a register request but to the realm in the uacreg table and the matching port Kamailio is running on. Is this because somewhere we have set Kamailio to directly proxy on and we need to turn that off first? This is our uacreg table mysql> select * from uacreg; +----+--------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+-----------+---------------+---------------+----------+--------------------+---------+-------+-----------+--------+ | id | l_uuid | l_username | l_domain | r_username | r_domain | realm | auth_username | auth_password | auth_ha1 | auth_proxy | expires | flags | reg_delay | socket | +----+--------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+-----------+---------------+---------------+----------+--------------------+---------+-------+-----------+--------+ | 1 | testuser | testuser | ourdomain.com | 88 | 10.8.8.20 | 10.8.8.20 | 88 | password | '' | sip:10.8.8.20:5060 | 360 | 0 | 3 | | +----+--------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+-----------+---------------+---------------+----------+--------------------+---------+-------+-----------+--------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) All pointer, guides and recommendations will be welcome Thanks very much Cheers Duncan

2 years, 8 months

Guidance tracking down "qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer"

by Anthony Joseph Messina

I'm seeking guidance on how to track down "qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer" which occurs only on branched calls. These errors don't crash so I don't get any core dumps. The different log entries below are the result of me selectively disabling sections of the script that apply in branch route, all to no avail. I'm running Kamailio on the current tip of the 5.5 branch (1f9f6fff6e). I'm reviewing https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory in the meantime as a place to start. version: kamailio 5.5.1-5.git1f9f6fff6e.fc34 (x86_64/linux) 7abebb flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f04b8f47e90), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f04b8f06c70), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f08e8f9cf80), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f2afafa60d8), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: init_p_payload_attr(183) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f2afae2a018), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f2afae431e8), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f2afafa3900), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f5fd4044ef0), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7ffbb2d2e2f0), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f6d1a50b1d8), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc19c165c70), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc19c17adb8), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc19c125790), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f4d969c9d48), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc29bdca3d0), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc2c2eccc80), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fc2c2ec52c0), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f910c04e240), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fa351286b18), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fa3512a7ae8), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fa0777d9e70), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fa0777d7a80), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f4f2c92cf20), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f4f2c8afa00), called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(470), first free textops: textops.c: add_hf_helper(3474) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f4f2c92aa48), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fe55825eb30), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: init_p_payload_attr(183) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f6526db8378), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd9b465980), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(217) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7ff7ca92ff60), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f978a2dc938), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f978a2b7eb8), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fa1556c1610), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fd81dfbba78), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fb2750d9988), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fb2750e1b28), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c: free_to_params(895) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f32f7b45d30), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(217) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f35849e1940), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(217) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fd3a2c04280), called from core: core/parser/sdp/sdp.c: free_sdp(825), first free core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_ua(994) - ignoring CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f5de857a040), called from core: core/parser/msg_parser.c: reset_instance(916), first free core: core/parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(217) - ignoring -- Anthony - https://messinet.com CCED 8BFB 88D9 18F6 9F68 93DC 45C4 A8CE A64E 88E3

2 years, 8 months

BYE not accepted by MS TEAMS

by João Vitor Arruda

Hello all, I recently built an SBC to integrate Kamailio with MS Teams following Henning Westerholt blob post and all the other awesome tips I was able to find here in the list. Everything is working great. The only missing piece I would like some thoughts on is about why MS Teams is not accepting the BYE sent from Kamailio. It eventually replies with "504 Server Time-out" The below trace shows the entire call. |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: rcv pid: 3381 process: 63 time: 1627070235.086307 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:15 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: 52.114.76.76 srcport: 4672 dstip: SBC_IP_ADDR dstport: 5061 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ INVITE sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone;transport=tls SIP/2.0 FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 TO: <sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone> CSEQ: 1 INVITE CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e MAX-FORWARDS: 70 VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bK60895c91 RECORD-ROUTE: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> CONTACT: <sip:api-du-b-usea2.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443 ;x-i=a82f1d71-4e21-42a8-8389-2ae26e54610f;x-c=c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e/d/8/b14037a741dd46a79c74dce15912782c> CONTENT-LENGTH: 1103 MIN-SE: 300 SUPPORTED: timer USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2021.6.15.17 i.EUNO.0 CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY PRIVACY: id SESSION-EXPIRES: 3600 v=0 o=- 599625 0 IN IP4 127.0.0.1 s=session c=IN IP4 52.113.58.181 b=CT:10000000 t=0 0 m=audio 50122 RTP/SAVP 104 9 103 111 18 0 8 97 101 13 118 c=IN IP4 52.113.58.181 a=rtcp:50123 a=ice-ufrag:fTy/ a=ice-pwd:tQKGN0Szi7Q/vTdf6SiXUSpj a=rtcp-mux a=candidate:1 1 UDP 2130706431 52.113.58.181 50122 typ srflx raddr 10.0.33.230 rport 50122 a=candidate:1 2 UDP 2130705918 52.113.58.181 50123 typ srflx raddr 10.0.33.230 rport 50123 a=candidate:2 1 tcp-act 2121006078 52.113.58.181 49152 typ srflx raddr 10.0.33.230 rport 49152 a=candidate:2 2 tcp-act 2121006078 52.113.58.181 49152 typ srflx raddr 10.0.33.230 rport 49152 a=label:main-audio a=mid:1 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:PC00Mgk39GjTYJ+mUSNQg++TU6zJKar4VYDj4/ET|2^31 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:104 SILK/16000 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:103 SILK/8000 a=rtpmap:111 SIREN/16000 a=fmtp:111 bitrate=16000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:97 RED/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=rtpmap:118 CN/16000 a=ptime:20 |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: snd pid: 3381 process: 63 time: 1627070235.089106 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:15 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: SBC_IP_ADDR srcport: 5061 dstip: 52.114.76.76 dstport: 4672 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 TO: <sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone> CSEQ: 1 INVITE CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bK60895c91;rport=4672 Server: kamailio (5.3.7 (x86_64/linux)) Content-Length: 0 |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: snd pid: 3291 process: 18 time: 1627070235.111825 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:15 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: SBC_IP_ADDR srcport: 5061 dstip: 52.114.76.76 dstport: 4672 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SIP/2.0 180 Ringing FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 t:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone>;tag=e55N8paBUgZac CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e CSEQ: 1 INVITE m:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@192.168.1.254:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent:FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.10.3-release~64bit Accept:application/sdp Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces u:talk,hold,conference,refer l:0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;rport=4672;branch=z9hG4bK60895c91 Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.253:5060 ;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on>,<sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> P-SR-XBranch: z9hG4bKe7d4.5ae277881edb9c04a7ac65af016e582e.0 |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: snd pid: 3298 process: 21 time: 1627070245.043621 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:25 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: SBC_IP_ADDR srcport: 5061 dstip: 52.114.76.76 dstport: 4672 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 t:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone>;tag=e55N8paBUgZac CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e CSEQ: 1 INVITE m:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@192.168.1.254:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent:FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.10.3-release~64bit Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces u:talk,hold,conference,refer c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:323 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;rport=4672;branch=z9hG4bK60895c91 Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.253:5060 ;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on>,<sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> P-SR-XBranch: z9hG4bKe7d4.5ae277881edb9c04a7ac65af016e582e.0 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1627045233 1627045234 IN IP4 SBC_IP_ADDR s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 SBC_IP_ADDR t=0 0 m=audio 49692 RTP/SAVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:eMGqj0jubamtvLsI/E/YSj8UqNKgUB5DTHGWc7PY a=nortpproxy:yes |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: snd pid: 3293 process: 19 time: 1627070255.938770 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:35 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: SBC_IP_ADDR srcport: 5061 dstip: 52.114.76.76 dstport: 4672 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SIP/2.0 200 OK FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 t:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone>;tag=e55N8paBUgZac CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e CSEQ: 1 INVITE m:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@192.168.1.254:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent:FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.10.3-release~64bit Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces u:talk,hold,conference,refer c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:323 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;rport=4672;branch=z9hG4bK60895c91 Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.253:5060 ;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on>,<sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> P-SR-XBranch: z9hG4bKe7d4.5ae277881edb9c04a7ac65af016e582e.0 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1627045233 1627045234 IN IP4 SBC_IP_ADDR s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 SBC_IP_ADDR t=0 0 m=audio 49692 RTP/SAVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:eMGqj0jubamtvLsI/E/YSj8UqNKgUB5DTHGWc7PY a=nortpproxy:yes |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: rcv pid: 3370 process: 57 time: 1627070255.957735 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:35 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: 52.114.76.76 srcport: 4672 dstip: SBC_IP_ADDR dstport: 5061 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACK sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@192.168.1.254:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 FROM: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 TO: <sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061>;user=phone;tag=e55N8paBUgZac CSEQ: 1 ACK CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e MAX-FORWARDS: 70 VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bKe3747d68 CONTACT: <sip:api-du-b-usea2.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443 ;x-i=a82f1d71-4e21-42a8-8389-2ae26e54610f;x-c=c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e/d/8/b14037a741dd46a79c74dce15912782c> CONTENT-LENGTH: 0 USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2021.6.15.17 i.EUNO.0 ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY Route: <sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on> Route: <sip:192.168.1.253:5060 ;r2=on;ftag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544;lr=on> P-SR-XUID: atpsh-60fb1b5d-d35-1 |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: snd pid: 3302 process: 23 time: 1627070275.228363 date: Fri Jul 23 19:57:55 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: SBC_IP_ADDR srcport: 5061 dstip: 52.114.75.24 dstport: 5061 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BYE sip:52.114.76.76:4672;x-i=a82f1d71-4e21-42a8-8389-2ae26e54610f;x-c=c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e/d/8/b14037a741dd46a79c74dce15912782c SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=e55N8paBUgZac;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.253:5060;r2=on;ftag=e55N8paBUgZac;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS SBC_IP_ADDR:5061;branch=z9hG4bK92fc.fcb147cf8e5e6e6e960d0f2401ad6383.0 v:SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;received=192.168.1.254;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKgvXrQrcNjNj3m f:<sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone>;tag=e55N8paBUgZac t:"Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 i:c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e CSeq:38981345 BYE User-Agent:FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.10.3-release~64bit Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces Reason:Q.850;cause=16;text="NORMAL_CLEARING" Max-Forwards: 64 l:0 Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> P-SR-XUID: atpsh-60fb1b5d-d35-1 |||||||||||||||||||| ==================== tag: rcv pid: 3385 process: 65 time: 1627070300.423499 date: Fri Jul 23 19:58:20 2021 proto: tls ipv4 srcip: 52.114.75.24 srcport: 5061 dstip: SBC_IP_ADDR dstport: 5061 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SIP/2.0 504 Server Time-out FROM: <sip:+5515XXXXXXXXX@SBC-FQDN:5061;user=phone>;tag=e55N8paBUgZac TO: "Last, First Name"<sip:+8979994;ext=01180@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=bafa0f5a573749a7b494917c0309f544 CSEQ: 38981345 BYE CALL-ID: c9b2aa4f658f5788aa7090bef0f5e35e VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS SBC_IP_ADDR:5061;branch=z9hG4bK92fc.fcb147cf8e5e6e6e960d0f2401ad6383.0 CONTENT-LENGTH: 0 ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY SERVER: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2021.6.15.17 i.EUWE.3 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.254;received=192.168.1.254;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKgvXrQrcNjNj3m Record-Route: <sip:SBC-FQDN:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=e55N8paBUgZac;lr=on>,<sip:192.168.1.253:5060 ;r2=on;ftag=e55N8paBUgZac;lr=on> P-SR-XBranch: z9hG4bK92fc.fcb147cf8e5e6e6e960d0f2401ad6383.0

2 years, 8 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2021