sr-users February 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

56 participants
77 discussions

by Björn Klasen

Hi everybody, I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems. When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc. But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty. Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set? BR, Björn -- Björn Klasen, Specialist TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP) Projensdorfer Straße 324 24106 Kiel Germany T +49 431/ 530530 F +49 431/ 7097-555 mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de http://www.tng.de Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg, Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428

1 month

Is Min-SE check broken?

by harneet singh

Hi All, I am facing an issue in understanding how the min_se should be working in kamailio. As per the SST documentation, it seems like if the min_se is configured as 500, then any value of Session-Expires OR MIN-SE if lower than 500, can be responded to by a 422. However, I strangely see the reverse happening. To investigate further, I looked in to the ki_sst_check_min() code in the master, and these seems like a potential issue. Ref Code: Inside ki_sst_check_min(), there is an if condition like below: if (sst_min_se < MIN(minse, se.interval)) { However, shouldn't it be the other way around? ie if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { because we need to send 422 if the received value(in INVITE etc) is smaller than the sst configure min_se value? I also found a different documentation, at https://git.sgu.ru/oldssu/ex-opensips/blob/cb9df8d59dbb254a9d862569fd5d11f6… where the check is as below? if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { Can someone confirm if this is broken, or my understanding is incorrect? Regards, Harneet -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

10 months, 4 weeks

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK

by Daniel Tryba

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: > Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find > callid-totag (from the response). > > I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves > different. Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted to topos-redis.

11 months, 4 weeks

ENV Values in cfg

by H Yavari

Hi to all, Is it possible to set modules parameters with env values? I know that in routes we can use $env(NAME), but what about for other parameters? for example setting DB address in K8s cluster ENV values. Regards,Hossein

2 years, 4 months

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

by Huber Andreas

Hi, We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon. Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate ! Thanks, Andreas From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. Regards, Federico On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote: Hello, We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE. We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect. The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch. But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something? Kind Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 years, 7 months

Roadmap to the next major release - v5.5.0

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, it is the time to plan a bit the road to the next major release, to be versioned 5.5.0. The 5.4.0 was release by end of July 2020, therefore we are approaching the end of our usual development cycle, also during the last online devel meeting we considered the 2nd part of spring 2021 as a target time frame for 5.5. To narrow it down, I would propose to freeze the development at the end of March 2021, test during April and maybe beginning of May, then release v5.5.0. So far we have a lot of development to existing components, by the freeze date I expect 3-5 new modules to be in the repo as well. If anyone wants a different time line towards 5.5.0, let's discuss and choose the one that suits most of the developers. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

2 years, 10 months

Kamailio how to make UAC challenge on Dispatcher failure route

by Antonio Couto

I have one Kamailio that makes an outbound register on two Asterisk. I have a dispatcher with that same two Asterisk destinations, on INVITE message I call replace_from("", ) in order to call a internal extension and on failure route I receive 401 and call the process of authorization is OK. The problem is that if the first Asterisk fail and I get 500 on failure route I can not call replace_from() because is not valid on the block. Is there any way to make this type of authorization process after receiving a 500 on failure route of dispatcher ? Below my cfg file. Thanks in advance. Antonio Couto #!KAMAILIO#!ifdef WITH_DEBUG#!define DBGLEVEL 3#!else#!define DBGLEVEL 2#!endif # - flags# FLT_ - per transaction (message) flags# FLB_ - per branch flags#!define FLT_ACC 1#!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2#!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3#!define FLT_NATS 5 #!define FLB_NATB 6#!define FLB_NATSIPPING 7 ####### Global Parameters ######### /* LOG Levels: 3=DBG, 2=INFO, 1=NOTICE, 0=WARN, -1=ERR, ... */ debug=DBGLEVEL /* set to 'yes' to print log messages to terminal or use '-E' cli option */log_stderror=no memdbg=5 memlog=5 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0log_prefix="{$mt $hdr(CSeq) $ci} " children=8 auto_aliases=noenable_tls=noenable_sctp=no tcp_accept_no_cl=yes # SIP port listen=udp:192.168.0.201:5060# xhttp port listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:8181 loadmodule "xhttp.so" loadmodule "jsonrpcs.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "corex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "dispatcher.so" loadmodule "htable.so" loadmodule "db_text.so" loadmodule "dialog.so" loadmodule "uac.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # ----- jsonrpcs params ----- modparam("jsonrpcs", "pretty_format", 1) modparam("jsonrpcs", "transport", 1) # ----- sanity params ----- modparam("sanity", "autodrop", 0) # ----- tm params -----# default retransmission timeout: 2sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 1500)# default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 40sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 40000) # ----- rr params -----# set next param to 1 to add value to ;lr param (helps with some UAs) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 0) modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1) # account triggers (flags) modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACCFAILED) modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;" "dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_dst", "_dsdst_") modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_ctx", "_dsctx_") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@kamailio.org") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_inactive_threshold", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_timer_mode", 1) modparam("db_text", "db_mode", 1) modparam("db_text", "emptystring", 1) modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4) modparam("dialog", "track_cseq_updates", 1) modparam("uac", "restore_dlg", 1) modparam("uac", "reg_db_url", "text:///etc/kamailio/dbtext") modparam("uac", "reg_db_table", "uacreg") modparam("uac", "reg_timer_interval", 60) modparam("uac", "reg_retry_interval", 60) modparam("uac", "reg_contact_addr", "192.168.0.201:5060") modparam("uac","auth_username_avp","$avp(auser)") modparam("uac","auth_password_avp","$avp(apass)") modparam("uac","auth_realm_avp","$avp(arealm)") ####### Routing Logic ######## # main request routing logic request_route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } # handle retransmissions if (!is_method("ACK")) { if(t_precheck_trans()) { t_check_trans(); exit; } t_check_trans(); } # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) { record_route(); } # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } # dispatch destinations if (is_method("INVITE")) { route(DISPATCH); } else { sl_send_reply("501","Not Implemented"); exit; } } # Dispatch requests route[DISPATCH] { if ($si == "192.168.0.44" and $sp == 5060) { xlog("L_ALERT","from switch $si:$sp)\n"); $var(groupid) = "2"; } else{ xlog("L_ALERT","from others $si:$sp)\n"); $var(groupid) = "1"; } if(!ds_select_dst($var(groupid), "11")) { send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); exit; } if ($du =~ "192.168.0.210") { xlog("L_ALERT", "SCRIPT: uac_replace_from\n"); uac_replace_from("", "sip:4000@192.168.0.201:5060"); } xlog("L_ALERT", "SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du> (attrs: $xavp(_dsdst_=>attrs))\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { $var(ts) = t_get_status_code(); xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH]] from $si:$rp status:$var(ts)\n"); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if(t_check_status("401|407")) { $avp(auser) = "4000"; $avp(apass) = "1234"; $avp(arealm) = "asterisk"; if (uac_auth()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { if (ds_next_dst()) { xlog("L_ALERT", "retrying to <$ru> via <$du> (attrs: $xavp(_dsdst_=>attrs))\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } } # Per SIP request initial checks route[REQINIT] { if($ua =~ "friendly|scanner|sipcli|sipvicious|VaxSIPUserAgent") { # silent drop for scanners - uncomment next line if want to reply # sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); exit; } if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(is_method("OPTIONS") && uri==myself && $rU==$null) { sl_send_reply("200","Keepalive"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("17895", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP request from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (!has_totag()) { return; } # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(RELAY); exit; } if (is_method("ACK")) { if (t_check_trans()) { # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be an ACK after a 487 # or e.g. 404 from upstream server route(RELAY); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("500","Server Internal Error"); exit; } # Wrapper for relaying requests route[RELAY] { # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. if (is_method("INVITE|BYE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { if(!t_is_set("branch_route")) t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); } if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { if(!t_is_set("onreply_route")) t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); } if (is_method("INVITE")) { if(!t_is_set("failure_route")) t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # jsonrpc dispatch event_route[xhttp:request] { if ($hu =~ "^/RPC") { jsonrpc_dispatch(); } else { xhttp_reply("200", "OK", "text/html", "<html><body>Wrong URL $hu</body></html>"); } }

3 years, 1 month

Need help in transforming an SDP string through a re.subst

by Denys Pozniak

Hello! There is a task to remove a fragment (*a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012*) from the SDP string generated by the rtpengine. *v=0#015#012o=kw 1614043485 1614043486 IN IP4 185.19.237.77#015#012s=kw#015#012c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 31828 RTP/AVP 0 8 101#015#012a=silenceSupp:off - - - -#015#012a=direction:both#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:31829#015#012a=ptime:20#015#012* The most logical option seems to be using the re.subst transformation, but so far no success. $avp(write_sdp_pv) = $(avp(write_sdp_pv){re.subst,/a=rtpmap:8 PCMA\/8000%23015%23012//s}); Сan there be an alternative or am I doing something wrong with the re.subst? -- BR, Denys Pozniak

3 years, 1 month

event_route when all modules have been loaded?

by Juha Heinanen

Is there a way to execute event_route when all modules have been loaded and Kamalio is ready to process requests? I found this in core cookbook, but what if there is no udp sip worker processes? event_route[core:worker-one-init] - executed by core after the first udp sip worker process executed the child_init() for all modules, before starting to process sip traffic -- Juha

3 years, 1 month

unsupported sip invite request-uri format ??

by lgl_hust＠sina.com

In sip register: Request-URI: sip:ims.mnc001.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org , sip register is ok.In sip invite: Request-URI: tel:310010120073501;phone-context=ims.mnc001.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org, return 478 Unresolvable destination .I saw issue #2287 and #1173 . #2287 deals with register, and #1173 has no result.I want to know how to support such RURI in sip invite, does it need a patch in code ? If so , where and how to modified it . Should i modified kamailio.cfg such as bellows ??? I don't know how modified the kamailio.cfg . if (is_method("INVITE")) {$ru = "sip:ims.mnc008.mcc460.3gppnetwork.org"; # rewrite the "Request-URI"$du= "sip:ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org"; } Thanks a lot.The following is the log:2021-02-23T03:12:08.391838+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:2021-02-23T03:12:08.391838+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): method:2021-02-23T03:12:08.392017+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): uri: tel:888555;phone-context=ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org2021-02-23T03:12:08.392190+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>2021-02-23T03:12:08.392358+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=102021-02-23T03:12:08.392556+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): [70]; uri=[tel:888555;phone-context=ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org]2021-02-23T03:12:08.392732+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to body (70)["888555"tel:888555;phone-context=ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org#15#012], to tag (0)[]2021-02-23T03:12:08.392904+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq : <1>2021-02-23T03:12:08.393072+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, = ; state=62021-02-23T03:12:08.393243+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 235, = <n/a>; state=172021-02-23T03:12:08.393419+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=52021-02-23T03:12:08.393615+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=22021-02-23T03:12:08.393814+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this is the first via2021-02-23T03:12:08.393975+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/receive.c:319]: receive_msg(): --- received sip message - request - call-id: [tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101] - cseq: [1 INVITE]2021-02-23T03:12:08.394132+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:185]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=7702021-02-23T03:12:08.394289+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header2021-02-23T03:12:08.394455+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/receive.c:379]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...2021-02-23T03:12:08.394623+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:74]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 702021-02-23T03:12:08.394782+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:247]: check_ruri_sip_version(): check_ruri_sip_version entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.394942+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:270]: check_ruri_sip_version(): check_ruri_sip_version passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.395104+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:277]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.395274+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:297]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.395439+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:318]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.395594+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:340]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.395748+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:348]: check_via1_header(): check via1 header2021-02-23T03:12:08.395905+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:506]: check_cseq_method(): check_cseq_method entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.396100+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:539]: check_cseq_method(): check_cseq_method passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.396261+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:548]: check_cseq_value(): check_cseq_value entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.396416+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:576]: check_cseq_value(): check_cseq_value passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.396570+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:585]: check_cl(): check_cl entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.396725+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:610]: check_cl(): check_cl passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.396882+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:622]: check_expires_value(): check_expires_value entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.397037+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:659]: check_expires_value(): no expires header found2021-02-23T03:12:08.397198+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:759]: check_parse_uris(): check_parse_uris entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.397352+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:763]: check_parse_uris(): parsing ruri2021-02-23T03:12:08.397521+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:777]: check_parse_uris(): looking up From header2021-02-23T03:12:08.397683+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:791]: check_parse_uris(): parsing From header2021-02-23T03:12:08.397846+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=qCfcbAf2021-02-23T03:12:08.398012+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=292021-02-23T03:12:08.398192+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:817]: check_parse_uris(): parsing From URI2021-02-23T03:12:08.398356+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:835]: check_parse_uris(): looking up To header2021-02-23T03:12:08.398510+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:857]: check_parse_uris(): check_parse_uris(): parsing To URI2021-02-23T03:12:08.398668+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity.c:902]: check_parse_uris(): check_parse_uris passed2021-02-23T03:12:08.398829+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} sanity [sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 12021-02-23T03:12:08.398997+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:1034]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f648b13dd60) id=3/238089 global id=0/0 T start=0xffffffffffffffff2021-02-23T03:12:08.399156+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:497]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=36710, isACK=02021-02-23T03:12:08.399309+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:455]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bKrDfcbAf2yakh41vbaiuY]2021-02-23T03:12:08.399481+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:675]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found2021-02-23T03:12:08.399669+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:1104]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f648b13dd60) id=3/238089 global id=3/238089 T end=(nil)2021-02-23T03:12:08.399832+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} siputils [checks.c:120]: has_totag(): no totag2021-02-23T03:12:08.399989+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/socket_info.c:630]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 0==13 && [] == [192.168.12.99]2021-02-23T03:12:08.400145+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/socket_info.c:637]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 50602021-02-23T03:12:08.400303+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1808]: str2ip6buf(): invalid name, no conversion to IP address possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.400465+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/name_alias.h:62]: grep_aliases(): matching (0::5060) vs. (0:ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org:0)2021-02-23T03:12:08.400625+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/forward.c:423]: check_self(): host (0::5060) != me2021-02-23T03:12:08.400792+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:1328]: t_newtran(): msg (0x7f648b13dd60) id=3/238089 global id=3/238089 T start=(nil)2021-02-23T03:12:08.400952+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:497]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=36710, isACK=02021-02-23T03:12:08.401109+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:455]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bKrDfcbAf2yakh41vbaiuY]2021-02-23T03:12:08.401266+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_lookup.c:675]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found2021-02-23T03:12:08.401420+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_hooks.c:336]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): trans=0x7f648403f798, callback type 1, id 0 entered2021-02-23T03:12:08.401590+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated: 589961c517bb910457d06701844fbbd42021-02-23T03:12:08.401768+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_funcs.c:325]: t_relay_to(): new INVITE2021-02-23T03:12:08.401934+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_reply.c:614]: _reply_light(): reply sent out. buf=0x7f648b1439c0: SIP/2.0 100 trying -..., shmem=0x7f6484043b78: SIP/2.0 100 trying -2021-02-23T03:12:08.402096+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_reply.c:625]: _reply_light(): finished2021-02-23T03:12:08.402250+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} <script>: new branch [0] to tel:888555;phone-context=ims.mnc008.mcc310.3gppnetwork.org2021-02-23T03:12:08.402406+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1740]: str2ipbuf(): invalid name, no conversion to IP address possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.402573+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1808]: str2ip6buf(): invalid name, no conversion to IP address possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.402735+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/dns_cache.c:527]: _dns_hash_find(): (_sip._udp.(10), 33), h=9562021-02-23T03:12:08.402891+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1808]: str2ip6buf(): invalid name, no conversion to IP address possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.403081+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1740]: str2ipbuf(): invalid name, no conversion to IP address possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.403245+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/dns_cache.c:521]: _dns_hash_find(): invalid name, no cache lookup possible2021-02-23T03:12:08.403415+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} [core/resolve.c:1715]: sip_hostport2su(): could not resolve hostname: ""2021-02-23T03:12:08.403577+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [ut.h:309]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve ""2021-02-23T03:12:08.403737+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches2021-02-23T03:12:08.403898+08:00 10-164 kamailio[238089]: DEBUG: {1 1 INVITE tBfcbAf2y(a)10.45.0.101} tm [t_funcs.c:335]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -478 (-478)

3 years, 1 month

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2021