sr-users November 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

48 participants
49 discussions

Possibility of mirroring the rpm/deb.kamailio.org repos efficiently via rsync?

by Malte Schmidt

Hello, is there an rsync endpoint available or is there a possiblity of setting this up? Creating a mirror via HTTP is a rather quick and dirty solution and while the deb-repo can be mirrored using debmirror, the rpm repo is hard to sync to a non-CentOS-based machine due to missing dependencies such as yum and reposync in latest Debian-based systems. Would be great to get some input in regards to this topic. Cheers

9 months, 1 week

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK

by Daniel Tryba

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: > Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find > callid-totag (from the response). > > I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves > different. Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted to topos-redis.

10 months, 3 weeks

Experiences with Kamailio on Debian 11 Bullseye

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, has anyone experienced issues with Kamailio running on Debian 11 Bullseye? It's now more than 2 months since Debian 11 release and I wonder if people started to migrate to it for production systems. So far I did only basic tests on it, although I have a Debian Testing that I used for compilation and simple tests during the past several months before Debian 11 release. If someone discovers issues or changes in behaviour with various libraries or applications/database servers, report them to the tracker to try to address them as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online Nov 08-11, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - Nov 22-25, 2021 (America Timezone) * https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

1 year, 2 months

Fwd: Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)?

by George Diamantopoulos

Forwarding my reply to the list, using gmail's reply button set Henning as the sole recipient :-\ ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 02:25 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> Hello Henning, Thanks for your reply. Here's what has come up after a few hours: shm55: https://pastebin.com/h9JCePmc shm54: https://pastebin.com/Nx5xEEnA It seems to me htable is the culprit? Are you seeing anything different? 54 has been running for 77020 seconds, 55 for 28521 (significantly less). I'm going to turn it off until we figure something out... BR, George On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 18:17, Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Good observation. Please run the memory statistics CLI commands to get > more hints about the module that might cause it (as per below link). Then > please report more details. If you can point to a particular module, you > can also open an issue on our tracker. > > > > https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *George > Diamantopoulos > *Sent:* Friday, June 25, 2021 4:53 PM > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> > *Subject:* [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm still investigating the (most likely non-kamailio-related) memory leak > of my previous message to the list, there have been no developments so far. > I'll update if anything changes. > > > > This concerns a new finding which seems to affect kamailio 5.5.x. I have > two kamailio instances receiving the same traffic via round-robin. I > upgraded only one of them to 5.5.1 and left the other to 5.4.6 as I feared > of any issues arising. I was lucky to do so, because with identical > configuration, 5.5.x seems to run out of SHM very quickly. Here are links > to graphs produced by our monitoring system: > > > > Old kamailio (no memory leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVBiD.png > > New kamailio (possible leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVS9N.png > > > > The configuration uses mtree, htable, vars and vns extensively. Has anyone > come across anything similar? Let me know if I can provide any further > information to help disect this. Thanks! > > > > BR, > > George >

1 year, 2 months

Unquoted values from #!defenv

by Ben Kaufman

Hello all, Looking for some clarification regarding quoting and !#defenv . I understand that the example below fails because the environmental variable HOME is not quoted, thus when used in the xlog() call it fails. How is it possible to evaluate and/or use the value of the environmental variable if defined as a preprocessor variable? Looking at the documentation the reason for this directive is "It is a simplified alternative of using #!substdef with $env(NAME) in the replacement part." But #!substdef would allow setting the value inside of a quoted string, so does it really meet that requirement? I'm aware that I could use $env(HOME) rather than a preprocessor directive of HOME. I'm just trying to understand the usage of the #!defenv feature. #!KAMAILIO ## Tested in 5.5.2 loadmodule "xlog" loadmodule "pv" loadmodule "evrexec" modparam("evrexec", "exec", "name=evrexec:timer;wait=1000;workers=1;") #!defenv HOME request_route{ forward(); } event_route[evrexec:timer] { xlog("L_N", "HOME: " + HOME + "\n"); } Ben Kaufman

1 year, 3 months

ENV Values in cfg

by H Yavari

Hi to all, Is it possible to set modules parameters with env values? I know that in routes we can use $env(NAME), but what about for other parameters? for example setting DB address in K8s cluster ENV values. Regards,Hossein

1 year, 3 months

DMQ Usrloc/Dialog - Experiences

by Carsten Bock

Hi, I wanted to quickly ask the group about experiences with DMQ and Usrloc/Dialog. I don't expect any issues when choosing such an approach, especially since we would have re-transmits for a message (fr_timer = 30 seconds) if we did not receive any answers or scenarios alike. So I assume, having short "outages" (less than 30 seconds) for the communication is just fine. So far I used DMQ in a non-IMS setup for synchronizing usrloc with ~15k Subscribers and it worked really well. One concern brought up (not by me) was, that synchronizing usrloc with DMQ might not be reliable at scale. I would also love to understand how to treat situations when the communication is lost for a longer period of time (e.g. if the communication between nodes is lost for 5 minutes?). Can anyone share some real-life experiences? Thanks, Carsten -- Carsten Bock I CTO & Founder ng-voice GmbH Trostbrücke 1 I 20457 Hamburg I Germany T +49 179 2021244 I www.ng-voice.com Registry Office at Local Court Hamburg, HRB 120189 Managing Directors: Dr. David Bachmann, Carsten Bock

1 year, 3 months

Using path with DMQ to send calls to origin SBC - not sure when to modify destination URI

by Rhys Hanrahan

Hi Everyone, I am trying to add DMQ for redundancy of registrations and USRLOC, and I’m trying to send calls to the correct SBC that is the original registrar for a handset. I’ve been using the thread here where Charles gave some guidance on how to use path to store and use the original SBC: https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2018-February/100246.html and https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2013-September/079736.html I am struggling with when to decide to modify the destination URI. My testing shows this is required otherwise some handsets will ignore the invite, but right now I am doing it in a blanket form, right before SIPOUT (which is where the origin SBC handles the invite instead of LOCATION). I am sure this is being too heavy-handed though and there are some cases where I won’t want to set this, but I am not sure which? # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) { record_route(); } … xlog("Setting du according to path. Current du is $du\n"); xlog("Current route header: $(hdr(Route))\n"); xlog("Current route: $(hdr(Route){uri.host})\n"); >>> $du = $(hdr(Route){param.value,received}); #xlog("New du destination uri is: $du\n"); # dispatch requests to foreign domains route(SIPOUT); In the linked threads, Charles mentioned that only the last-hop registrar should make this change, but what’s the best way to determine if I am on the last-hop registrar? As per the snippet above, I tried using the {uri.host} transformation to extract the origin SBC’s IP from the route header. My plan is to then compare this against “myself” but I am struggling to extract the right info from the route header. And I am not even sure if this is the right general approach? The route header looks like this: <sip:ORIGIN_SBC_IP:5060;received=sip:UAC_WAN_IP:2048;lr> Any guidance or examples would be appreciated. Thanks! Rhys Hanrahan | Chief Information Officer e: rhys(a)nexusone.com.au<mailto:rhys@nexusone.com.au> [www.nexusone.com.au]<http://www.nexusone.com.au/> [signature_555064778] <http://www.fusiontech.com.au/> NEXUS ONE | FUSION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS p: 1800 NEXUS1 (1800 639 871) or 1800 565 845 | a: Suite 12.03 Level 12, 227 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000 www.nexusone.com.au<http://www.nexusone.com.au/> | www.fusiontech.com.au<http://www.fusiontech.com.au/> The information in this email and any accompanying attachments may contain; a. Confidential information of Fusion Technology Solutions Pty Ltd, Nexus One Pty Ltd or third parties; b. Legally privileged information of Fusion Technology Solutions Pty Ltd, Nexus One Pty Ltd or third parties; and or c. Copyright material Fusion Technology Solutions Pty Ltd, Nexus One Pty Ltd or third parties. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Fusion Technology Solutions Pty Ltd, Nexus One Pty Ltd does not accept any responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use or distribution of this email. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

1 year, 4 months

probles with listen advertise address trying to be resolved

by Richard Robson

I have a problem when trying to add an advertised address in Kamailio 5.4.2 we have a checf config that is populating various variable. some of these are for the Listeners we have this working and Im getting all protocols for the listeners based on the non _TLS Vars but the TLS config is trying to resolve ADVERTISE_NAT_ADDRESS_TLS. If I try and quote the variable "ADVERTISE_NAT_ADDRESS_TLS" id get an error saying 1.2.3.4:5061 is not resolvable therefroe I have udp,tcp and tls listeners all on the default ports where i need the tls on port 5061 ans not 5060 listen LISTEN_EXTERNAL_SOCKET advertise ADVERTISE_NAT_ADDRESS name = "ext" listen LISTEN_INTERNAL_SOCKET name = "int" listen LISTEN_EXTERNAL_SOCKET_TLS advertise name = "ext-tls" listen LISTEN_INTERNAL_SOCKET_TLS name = "int-tls" the Vars are defined as #!define TOPO_NAT #!substdef "!LISTEN_EXTERNAL_SOCKET!10.10.10.10:5060!g" #!substdef "!LISTEN_INTERNAL_SOCKET!10.10.10.10:5080!g" #!substdef "!ADVERTISE_NAT_ADDRESS!1.2.3.4:5060!g" #!define ENABLE_TLS #!define TLS_CONFIG_FILE "chef-managed/tls.cfg" #!substdef "!LISTEN_EXTERNAL_SOCKET_TLS!tls:10.225.73.16:5061!g" #!substdef "!LISTEN_INTERNAL_SOCKET_TLS!tls:10.225.73.16:5061!g" #!substdef "!ADVERTISE_NAT_ADDRESS_TLS!1.2.3.4:5061!g" REgards, Richard

1 year, 4 months

Kamailio and RTPEngine acting as SBC : wrong IP address returned

by Cyril Ramière

Hi there, I'm already using Kamailio as a simple proxy and it worked flawlessly. This time, I need to have a new setup like this: [UAC (sip phone)] <--- register & has to deal only with ----> | PUBLIC | [Kamailio + RtpEngine] | PRIVATE | <----> [Asterisk] Client = 37.100.100.100 (public) Asterisk = 172.17.200.20 (private) Kamailio/RtpEngine = 172.17.203.102 (private, advertising 3.99.99.99 public IP) Kamailio and RtpEngine will behave as a SBC/B2BUA, the client will deal only with kamailio using public access (internet), and asterisk will handle the calls but stays 100% private behind kamailio. Kamailio will handle registrations to reduce the load put on the asterisk boxes. The setup is running on AWS, my Kamailio has 1 Private IP address tied to 1 Public IP address (an Elastic public IP) so, no multi-homing, one network interface. I made a "simple" work in progress configuration, the registration is working as a PoC, and my calls are *almost* working but with some nonsense. My Main issue is that when my UAC (SIP phone) make a call, to let's say +1000, the call enters kamailio, then kamailio handle the invite, trigger rtpEngine, but the IP addresses in Record-Route and Via headers are wrong. >From Kamailio to UAC Sip Phone, it seems OK. But from Kamailio to Asterisk, the record-route/via headers are set with Kamailio Public IP when it should be the Kamailio private IP. So, when Asterisk sends a BYE, it tries to send it to the public IP of Kamailio, which is wrong. There are probably other quirks in the configuration but this one, I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm attaching a capture file, a log file and my configuration file (some informations are redacted). I am missing something and sadly I can't figure out what, a little help would be appreciated :) Regards

1 year, 4 months

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2021