Hi Andreas, I ran into the case you had many years ago. I'm using 5.4.4 version but still have very similar issue. Do you remember how you solved your problem? Thanks, Koray On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:47 PM Huber Andreas <andreas.huber@nagra.com> wrote:

Hi,

We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon.

Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate !

Thanks,

Andreas

*From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] *On Behalf Of *Federico Cabiddu *Sent:* vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56 *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

Hi,

which version are you using?

A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0.

Regards,

Federico

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber@nagra.com> wrote:

Hello,

We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE.

We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.

The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.

But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something?

Kind Regards,

Andreas

_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users