sr-users April 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

250 participants
697 discussions

[Serusers] t_on_failure and t_on_reply
by Iqbal 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hi Is there any order these should be placed in config file. Is a failure response also considered a reply in t_on_reply, if so, then placing reply above failure will mean failure never gets caught Iqbal

2 1

[Serusers] zombie status in location table
by Cesc Santasusana 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hi, After de-registration, a contact in the location table is marked as zombie, and after some time, it is deleted from the table. Right? Ok, what happens when this user receives a call ... i mean, he is in the location table (as zombie), but he is not registered really on the phone? What do the lookup('location") and registered('location") in this scenario return? In my config ... a first call to lookup(loc) returns false, and then calling registered(loc) returns true. Is that right? Shouldn't the two functions do the same, just lookup rewrites the uri? Tks! Cesc Unclassified

2 1

[Serusers] Free TLS Implementation
by Peter Griffiths 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

hello -- some time ago i extended ser to support tls, basically i implemented functions needed by the existing tls api. i polished the code a bit and i am giving it away freely. there are still some things to fix, but it mostly works. to use the code, copy tls directory into your ser tree and optionally patch cfg.lex and cfg.y, then recompile ser with TLS=on. if you also patch cfg.lex and cfg.y then you can use extended cfg syntax and specify different keys and certificates for different listen sockets. this is similar to apache virtual servers with ssl. without the patches you can only use the default configuration directives. to iptel: would be great to have it in cvs, what do you think ? -- peter ----------- example ser.cfg: listen=tls:127.0.0.1:5061 listen=tls:127.0.0.1:5062 # defaults for outgoing tls connections tls_certificate="default.crt" tls_private_key = "default.key" # domain1.com tls_domain[127.0.0.1:5061] { tls_certificate="domain1.crt" tls_private_key = "domain1.key" tls_method = sslv2 } # domain2.com tls_domain[127.0.0.1:5062] { tls_certificate="domain2.crt" tls_private_key="domain2.key" } __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

5 4

[Serusers] Latest most stable SER release
by Darren Nay 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hey Guys, I need some advice. We have been running SER 0.8.12 since it was released almost a year ago. However, we have decided recently that we need to upgrade for some of the features in the newer versions. What is the most stable later release? I see releases of 10.99, and 0.9.x, and IPTels webpage even says that 0.8.14 is the most stable production release ?? I just need some clarification on which version actually -is- stable enough for production use. Thanks for your help! Darren Nay VoIP Network Development Ionosphere, Inc dnay(a)ionosphere.net

2 1

[Serusers] RFC3261 Section 8.2.6.1
by Java Rockx 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hi All. This section of the RFC states this: 8.2.6.1 <http://8.2.6.1> Sending a Provisional Response One largely non-method-specific guideline for the generation of responses is that UASs SHOULD NOT issue a provisional response for a non-INVITE request. Rather, UASs SHOULD generate a final response to a non-INVITE request as soon as possible. Does this mean SER should never send a 1xx response for anything except INVITE messages? Regards, Paul

2 1

[Serusers] HELP: set max_contacts parameter on registrar module fail
by Charles Wang 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hi, ALL: I set the following line on my ser.cfg to limit the max registers. modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 3) Then I restart my ser. I find that I can register more than 3 UACs to my ser. So I guess that the parameter max_contacts is not workable. Is it true? Does anybody have any idea/solution about it? -- Best Regards Charles

3 6

[Serusers] SER with Windows-Messenger in different subnets
by Hendrik Utsch 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hello all, we have a SIP Express Router located in 172.16.0.0/16 and several Windows Messenger clients, located in the same subnet as well, as in 192.168.190.0/24. All clients can establish successfully connections to other clients in the first subnet, but connections to clients in the second subnet end with "404 Not Found". The behaviour is very strange, since I got it to work with some clients in the second subnet, but then after a restart of the SER process it didn't work again. I definitely have changed nothing! Here is the conf file: # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.11 2002/10/04 21:40:31 jiri Exp $ # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes# (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/print.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwars==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Do strict routing if pre-loaded route headers present rewriteFromRoute(); # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri=~"sip.####.de") { if (method=="REGISTER") { save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } Thanks, Hendrik Utsch Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Systemtechnik eMail: hendrik.utsch(a)tecsphere.com TecSphere AG Standort Köln Claudiastraße 2b D-51149 Köln Deutschland Fon: +49 (2203) 89 11 506 Fax: +49 (2203) 89 11 111 http://www.tecsphere.com

2 1

[Serusers] radius acc in newest ser does not compile
by Wojciech Ziniewicz 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

I want to compile ACC module with Radius Accounting but uncommenting theese two lines as said in modules/acc/Makefile makes the "acc.so" disapear (it simply does not compile) 1.I have downloaded the SER v.0.9-0 from developer at berlios.de (not the cvs one). 2. I have built a *deb package since i have debian. Maybe it's debian specific ? 3. After a build I see whats in the ser_8.0-12.deb (the version is invalid :) ) and there's no module with that name. ============fragment from modules/acc/Makefile============== ... # uncomment the next two lines if you wish to enable RADIUS accounting # DEFS+=-DRAD_ACC -I/usr/include LIBS=-L/usr/lib -lradiusclient ... =============end of the fragment========================== -- Pozdrawiam, Wojciech Ziniewicz Optocomp sp.z.o.o, www.optocomp.pl mailto: wojtekz(a)optocomp.pl +48(0)691031535

2 1

[Serusers] Call to another host
by "Sebastian Kühner" 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Hello, I have ser locally installed on 192.168.1.223 and asterisk on 192.168.1.222. I have two softphones: sip:13@192.168.1.222 (asterisk) and sip:14@192.168.1.223 (ser) If I want to call 14(a)192.168.1.223 (asterisk -> ser) it works perfectly, but if I want to call 13(a)192.168.1.222 (ser -> asterisk) the call fails (Call rejected: 403 forbidden). What do I make wrong?? Thanks! Sebastian -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse f�r Mail, Message, More +++ 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail

1 0

[Serusers] errors and warnings with serweb
by Llanos Serna García-Conde 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
70
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2005