1 Mar
2016
1 Mar
'16
5:29 p.m.
Hi,
Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply from
kamailio.
Thanks,
Uri
1 Mar
1 Mar
5:50 p.m.
On 01 Mar 2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked
<ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply from kamailio.
Why would you want to do that? Curious.
I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the
scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
/O
6:23 p.m.
* On 01 Mar 2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked <ushacked at
gmail.com <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote:
*> >* Hi,
*> >* Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless
reply from kamailio.
*
Why would you want to do that? Curious.
I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined
to-tag in the scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
/O
I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
being relayed to the caller.
I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to resume
the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order for the
client to disconnect immediately.
So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.
Uri
.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply
from kamailio.
Thanks,
Uri
2 Mar
2 Mar
1:04 p.m.
On 01/03/16 17:23, Uri Shacked wrote:
It should work to send the 487
with any To-tag, because the call is not
answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.
Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
/On 01 Mar
2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com
<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote:
/>//>/Hi, />//>/Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own
stateless reply
from kamailio. /
Why would you want to do that? Curious.
I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the
scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
/O
I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
being relayed to the caller.
I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to
resume the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order
for the client to disconnect immediately.
So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.
10:37 p.m.
*I tried sl_send_reply(), send_reply() and t_reply() (after
t_newtran() for the last one).*
*all did not work.*
*if i send reply before the cancel arrives, yes, no problem.*
*but i want to reply to the cancel with 487, and it does not seem to work.*
*the only differences between my reply and the 487 destination's
reply, is the to_tag and the Cseq method (Cseq number is the same).*
*the destination's 487 to_tag is similar to the 180/183 to_tag that it
sent prior to canceling and the 487 Cseq method is for the INVITE.*
*on the reply i generate th Cseq method is CANCEL.*
*any ideas?*
*thanks,*
*Uri*
It should work to send the 487 with any To-tag, because
the call is not
answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.
Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?
Cheers,
Daniel
Why would you want to do that? Curious.
I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the
scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
/O
I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
being relayed to the caller.
I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to resume
the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order for the
client to disconnect immediately.
So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.
Uri
.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply
from kamailio.
Thanks,
Uri
3216
days inactive
3217
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Olle E. Johansson -
Uri Shacked