I tried sl_send_reply(), send_reply() and t_reply() (after t_newtran() for the last one).
all did not work.
if i send reply before the cancel arrives, yes, no problem.
but i want to reply to the cancel with 487, and it does not seem to work.
the only differences between my reply and the 487 destination's reply, is the to_tag and the Cseq method (Cseq number is the same).
the destination's 487 to_tag is similar to the 180/183 to_tag that it sent prior to canceling and the 487 Cseq method is for the INVITE.
on the reply i generate th Cseq method is CANCEL.
any ideas?
thanks,
Uri





>It should work to send the 487 with any To-tag, because the call is not
>answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
>are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.
>
>Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?
>
>Cheers,
>Daniel

Why would you want to do that? Curious.

I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.

/O

I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s being relayed to the caller.
I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to resume the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order for the client to disconnect immediately.

So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.

Uri

.



On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply from kamailio.

Thanks,
Uri