On 01/03/16 17:23, Uri Shacked wrote:

> On 01 Mar 2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own stateless reply from kamailio.

Why would you want to do that? Curious.

I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.

/O
I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s being relayed to the caller.

I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.

But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to resume the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order for the client to disconnect immediately.

So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.

It should work to send the 487 with any To-tag, because the call is not answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.

Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com