24 May
2007
24 May
'07
2:48 p.m.
We then have 9 nominees on:
http://www.iptel.org/nominations_and_voting_technical_board_2007
Could those who have been nominated, but still are listed as "suggested"
on the page above, please contact me privately to tell if they accept
the nomination?
g-)
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
Personally I will constrain myself to three however
difficult it
may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core
achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model
achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on
operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long
list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that,
Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become
longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)
-jiri
At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS,
Jiri Kuthan and Andrei
Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik
Scholz.
Jan.
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new
page on iptel.org if and
when people accept the nominations.
Let me start:
I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
SER), N. (sip(a)arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider
installations).
As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
representative/developer, I only nominate four.
g-)
SIP wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site
somewhere to keep track
of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
deciding their votes. Just an idea.
I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
stuff! Seconded? ;)
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
> Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in
> decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
> mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
> rationale in order to prefer it.
> g-)
> ------- Original message -------
> From: Martin Hoffmann <hn(a)nvnc.de>
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, serdev(a)lists.iptel.org, semsdev(a)iptel.org
> Sent: 18.5.'07, 10:54
>
>
>
>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote. My
>>> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
>>> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
>>> posting to the list.
>>>
>>>
>> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
>> secret.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers