We then have 9 nominees on:
http://www.iptel.org/nominations_and_voting_technical_board_2007

Could those who have been nominated, but still are listed as "suggested" on the page above, please contact me privately to tell if they accept the nomination?
g-)

Jiri Kuthan wrote:
Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it
may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core 
achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model 
achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on 
operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long 
list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, 
Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become
longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)


-jiri

At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
  
I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei
Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik
Scholz.

 Jan.

Greger V. Teigre wrote:
    
Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and
when people accept the nominations.

Let me start:
I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
SER), N. (sip@arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider
installations).

As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
representative/developer, I only nominate four.
g-)


SIP wrote:
      
You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track
of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
deciding their votes. Just an idea.

I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
stuff! Seconded? ;)


N.


Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
        
Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in
decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
rationale in order to prefer it.
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: Martin Hoffmann <hn@nvnc.de>
Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org, serdev@lists.iptel.org, semsdev@iptel.org
Sent: 18.5.'07,  10:54

 
          
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
  
            
I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote.  My
interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
posting to the list.
      
              
I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
secret.

Regards,
Martin
    
            
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
  
          
        
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

      
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
Serdev@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
    



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/