sr-users January 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

131 participants
217 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3 How to rewrite transport protocol from udp to tcp after redirect

by Peter P GMX

Hello, I have the following scenario: SIP UA <=UDP=> OpenSER <=TCP> Microsoft Unified Messaging 2007 When I invite an account on the UM 2007 server the following happens 1 SIP UA ==Invite UDP=> OpenSER 2 SIP UA <== 407 Proxy Authentication Required UDP= OpenSER 3 SIP UA ==ACK UDP=> OpenSER 4 SIP UA ==Invite UDP=> OpenSER 5 OpenSER ==Invite TCP=> UM2007 6 OpenSER <=Trying TCP== UM2007 7 OpenSER <= 302 Moved Temporarily TCP== UM2007 8 OpenSER == ACK TCP=> UM2007 9 OpenSER == INVITE UDP=> UM2007 .....no answer from UM2007 (I left out some steps between Openser and UA) In Step 5 OpenSER invites "sip:11111@10.10.2.13;transport=UDP>" with TCP protocol (checked with ngrep) and UM2007 answers. In Step 7 UM2007 answers with CONTACT: <sip:11111@10.10.2.13:5065;transport=UDP> but I need to answer on TCP to UM2007. (I can change the message with add_uri_param("transport=tcp") in step 5 and I get a <sip:11111@10.10.2.13:5065;transport=TCP> back from UA2007, but in fact the message is corrupted and OpenSER replies to the UA with Error 500 then, see below) The point is: - I can invite UM2007 with TCP (although I was not able to produce correct headers as there is still "transport=udp;>" mentioned in the INVITE part) - but in the failure route when I force OpenSER to reinvite with get_redirects("*") and t_relay() I am not able to swith to TCP I tried several ways as described in discussions which I found in http://osdir.com/ml/voip.openser.user/2005-12/msg00256.html - add_uri_param("transport=tcp"); ==> added transport=tcp additionally to transport=udp ==> transport=udp;transport=tcp ==> 500 Internal Server error - $avp(s:foo)="sip:10.10.2.13;transport=tcp"; avp_pushto("$du","$avp(s:foo)"); ==>had actually no effect - replace_all("transport=udp", "transport=tcp"); ==> produced invalid headers as it simply replaced the headers wrongly as described in http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/2007-May/007702.html Questions: 1. How can I change the initial INVITe message (Step5) in order to have the right headers. (transport=TCP instead of transport=UDP)? 2. How can I answer to a redirect and change to a different transport protocol (Step 9)? Your help is very much appreciated. Best regards Peter

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] Lookinfg for an SCTP compliant SIP phone

by Rajat Dudeja

Hi folks, I'm new to openser. I'm using the sctp feature of it. I'm looking to test the openser's sctp functionality. For this I have used the sctp compliant kphone. However, it does not work. The phone does not even register. Please suggest if there is any other tool to it's functionality. Thanks and regards, Rajat =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you

16 years, 11 months

[Serusers] presence: difference between watchers and active_watchers

by Klaus Darilion

Hi! Can someone explain me please the difference between between watchers and active_watchers? If I understand correctly, active_watchers are the SIP clients which have SUBSCRIBEd and thus will receive NOTIFYs. But what are "watchers"? regards klaus

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] User Agent (Client)

by J Bhanot

Hi, I am running openser Server... I want to know that do we have any inbuit user agent (client) in openser which we can use to send messages to this running server.. Thanks, jb ____________________________________________ =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you

16 years, 11 months

[Serusers] ser , rtpproxy and pstn gateway

by mashudi

I have two separate network, for public and vpn , i have install ser and rtpproxy on different machine, all user from public network will register to proxy server on ip 10.44.9.18 and the rtp will be handle by another machine using ip 10.44.9.17 , all call comming from client on public ip will route to pstn gateway using cantata media gateway on ip 10.177.107.90 (vpn ip). When client call to pstn gateway, the signalling reach the callee, but after callee pickup the phone, the client using x-lite still in calling status, and rtpproxy not receive rtp from pstn gateway. the rtpproxy have two nic using two ip for public and vpn, and ser as proxy using two nic public ip and vpn ip. any one can help? here is the log for rtpproxy and ser. the rtpproxy log : Starting rtpproxy: rtpproxy started, pid 25745 received command "2573_0 V" sending reply "2573_0 20040107 " received command "2574_0 V" sending reply "2574_0 20040107 " received command "2572_0 V" sending reply "2572_0 20040107 " received command "2572_6 U NjQzNmQzNzFjZTBmMzM5MDUxYjQwODFlOTFmMTdhMzI. 10.11.11.152 30126 9d08dc55" new session NjQzNmQzNzFjZTBmMzM5MDUxYjQwODFlOTFmMTdhMzI., tag 9d08dc55 requested, type strong new session on a port 35010 created, tag 9d08dc55 pre-filling caller's address with 10.11.11.152:30126 sending reply "2572_6 35010 10.44.9.17 " the ser log: 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <NOTIFY> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170743627@10.11.11.152:65100> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-9533d56650536c16-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=128 0(2572) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(2572) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=8 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9e3f287c 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [56]; uri=[sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=59420d70 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) is_preloaded: No 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==10 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==14 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.177.107.124] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==10 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==14 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.177.107.124] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) check_self: host != me 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) after_loose: Topmost route URI: 'sip:10.44.9.18;lr;ftag=9e3f287c' is me 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <13> <NOTIFY> 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=461 0(2572) found end of header 0(2572) find_next_route: No next Route HF found 0(2572) after_loose: No next URI found 0(2572) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=55 , global msg id=54 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=60 0(2572) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=24011, isACK=0 0(2572) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(2572) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(2572) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(2572) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 0x6be9c8 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x2ab57bba4208 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x2ab57bba4228 0(2572) SER: new transaction fwd'ed 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(2572) SIP Reply (status): 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) status: <200> 0(2572) reason: <OK> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKbcd5.79134365.0>; state=16 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(2572) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=56 global id=55 T start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=17 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-9533d56650536c16-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <65100>; state=16 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=17 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9e3f287c 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [56]; uri=[sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <13> <NOTIFY> 0(2572) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 24011 label 1446261143 branch 0 0(2572) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x2ab57bba4030)! 0(2572) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=56 global id=56 T end=0x2ab57bba4030 0(2572) DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0) 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=200 0(2572) DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 0(2572) old size: 531, new size: 472 0(2572) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:267, new: 208, rest: 264 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.11.11.152:65100;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-9533d56650536c16-1--d87543-;rport=65100 Record-Route: <sip:10.44.9.18;lr;ftag=59420d70> Contact: <sip:02170743627@10.11.11.152:65100> To: "02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>;tag=9e3f287c From: "02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>;tag=59420d70 Call-ID: MWNiZWE5ODMyN2U0MTJmMWMyNjQzMTNiNGJjZmRjYjA. CSeq: 13 NOTIFY User-Agent: X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41150 Content-Length: 0 0(2572) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x2ab57bba40b0 0(2572) DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x6c9930: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x2ab57bba6b10: SIP/2.0 2 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x2ab57bba40b0 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x2ab57bba4030 from table 1(2573) DEBUG: delete transaction 0x2ab57bba4030 1(2573) DEBUG: wait_handler : done 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <INVITE> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-2623ee4d6908a453-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=128 0(2572) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(2572) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=8 0(2572) end of header reached, state=9 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170890010"<sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> ] 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9d08dc55 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE> 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=420 0(2572) found end of header 0(2572) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(2572) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=16384 0(2572) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 0(2572) build_auth_hf(): 'Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="10.44.9.18", nonce="4798817c850ce0e3c233a35804d9be1afe7fe2a3" ' 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <ACK> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-2623ee4d6908a453-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=4 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=a3f1a545ddce5205bb83afef24613e34.78aa 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [85]; uri=[sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170890010"<sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) DEBUG: sl_filter_ACK : local ACK found -> dropping it! 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <INVITE> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-363a1c17b37ac509-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=128 0(2572) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(2572) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=8 0(2572) end of header reached, state=9 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [43]; uri=[sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170890010"<sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> ] 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9d08dc55 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <INVITE> 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=420 0(2572) found end of header 0(2572) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(2572) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) check_nonce(): comparing [4798817c850ce0e3c233a35804d9be1afe7fe2a3] and [4798817c850ce0e3c233a35804d9be1afe7fe2a3] 0(2572) HA1 string calculated: 0f7e2f302e87dfe46c5ca6566ad32b47 0(2572) check_response(): Our result = '82c47bef0adf71299b8fb157a15e0131' 0(2572) check_response(): Authorization is OK 0(2572) save_rpid(): rpid value is '' 0(2572) check_username(): Digest username and URI username match 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) lookup(): '02170890010' Not found in usrloc 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) DEBUG:check_content_type: type <application/sdp> found valid 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=32 0(2572) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP 0(2572) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=59 , global msg id=56 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=60 0(2572) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48512, isACK=0 0(2572) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(2572) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(2572) SER: new INVITE 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 0(2572) DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x6c9930: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x2ab57bba3ad8: SIP/2.0 1 0(2572) DEBUG: _reply_light: finished 0(2572) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(2572) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 0x6bebb8 0(2572) WARNING: get_send_socket: not listening on the requested socket, no fork mode? 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=2048 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) clen_builder: content-length: 436 (436) 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x2ab57bba4208 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x2ab57bba4228 0(2572) SER: new transaction fwd'ed 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[5]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:5,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[6]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:6,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 0x6be9c8 0(2572) udp_rcv_loop: probing packet received from 10.11.11.152 19710 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, INVITE si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[7]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x2ab57bba4228 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: final_response_handler:stop retr. and send CANCEL (0x2ab57bba4030) 1(2573) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=408 1(2573) DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 1(2573) parse_headers: flags=-1 1(2573) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x2ab57bba4150 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x2ab57bba4170 1(2573) DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x6c84d0: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0x2ab57bba3ad8: SIP/2.0 4 1(2573) DEBUG: final_response_handler : done 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <ACK> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-363a1c17b37ac509-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=128 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=d548cf07be509c4dc64b42f06e6fb880-a911 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [85]; uri=[sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170890010"<sip:02170890010@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <ACK> 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(2572) found end of header 0(2572) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found! 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9d08dc55 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) find_first_route: No Route headers found 0(2572) loose_route: There is no Route HF 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=60 , global msg id=59 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=60 0(2572) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48512, isACK=1 0(2572) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=-d87543-363a1c17b37ac509-1--d87543- 0(2572) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x2ab57bba4030) 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x2ab57bba40b0 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x2ab57bba4150 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x2ab57bba40b0 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x2ab57bba4030 from table 1(2573) DEBUG: delete transaction 0x2ab57bba4030 1(2573) DEBUG: wait_handler : done 0(2572) SIP Request: 0(2572) method: <NOTIFY> 0(2572) uri: <sip:02170743627@10.11.11.152:65100> 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-3217dc739e312401-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=128 0(2572) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 0(2572) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=8 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9e3f287c 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [56]; uri=[sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=59420d70 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) is_preloaded: No 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==10 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==14 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.177.107.124] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==10 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==14 && [10.11.11.152] == [10.177.107.124] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 65100 0(2572) check_self: host != me 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.44.9.18] == [10.44.9.18] 0(2572) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 0(2572) after_loose: Topmost route URI: 'sip:10.44.9.18;lr;ftag=9e3f287c' is me 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=256 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <14> <NOTIFY> 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=425 0(2572) found end of header 0(2572) find_next_route: No next Route HF found 0(2572) after_loose: No next URI found 0(2572) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=61 , global msg id=60 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=-1 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=60 0(2572) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=24006, isACK=0 0(2572) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(2572) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(2572) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 0(2572) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 0x6be9c8 0(2572) check_via_address(10.11.11.152, 10.11.11.152, 0) 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x2ab57bba4208 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x2ab57bba4228 0(2572) SER: new transaction fwd'ed 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up 1(2573) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x2ab57bba4208 next=(nil) 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request resending (t=0x2ab57bba4030, NOTIFY si ... ) 1(2573) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[5]: 0x2ab57bba4208 1(2573) DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done 0(2572) SIP Reply (status): 0(2572) version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2572) status: <200> 0(2572) reason: <OK> 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=1 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK6cd5.c487f5f5.0>; state=16 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2572) After parse_msg... 0(2572) forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 0(2572) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=62 global id=61 T start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=17 0(2572) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-d87543-3217dc739e312401-1--d87543->; state=6 0(2572) Found param type 235, <rport> = <65100>; state=16 0(2572) end of header reached, state=5 0(2572) parse_headers: Via found, flags=17 0(2572) parse_headers: this is the second via 0(2572) DEBUG: add_param: tag=9e3f287c 0(2572) end of header reached, state=29 0(2572) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [56]; uri=[sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18] 0(2572) DEBUG: to body ["02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>] 0(2572) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <14> <NOTIFY> 0(2572) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 24006 label 1600092236 branch 0 0(2572) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x2ab57bba4030)! 0(2572) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=62 global id=62 T end=0x2ab57bba4030 0(2572) DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0) 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) parse_headers: flags=64 0(2572) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=200 0(2572) DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 0(2572) old size: 531, new size: 472 0(2572) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:267, new: 208, rest: 264 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.11.11.152:65100;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-3217dc739e312401-1--d87543-;rport=65100 Record-Route: <sip:10.44.9.18;lr;ftag=59420d70> Contact: <sip:02170743627@10.11.11.152:65100> To: "02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>;tag=9e3f287c From: "02170743627"<sip:02170743627@10.44.9.18>;tag=59420d70 Call-ID: MWNiZWE5ODMyN2U0MTJmMWMyNjQzMTNiNGJjZmRjYjA. CSeq: 14 NOTIFY User-Agent: X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41150 Content-Length: 0 0(2572) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 0(2572) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x2ab57bba40b0 0(2572) DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x6c9930: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x2ab57bba6b10: SIP/2.0 2 0(2572) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2572) receive_msg: cleaning up # $Id: nat-rtpproxy.cfg 51 2006-01-31 13:28:04Z /CN=Paul Hazlett/emailAddress=paul(a)onsip.org $ debug=9 fork=no log_stderror=yes mhomed=yes listen=10.44.9.18 # INSERT YOUR IP ADDRESS HERE listen=10.177.107.124 port=5060 children=4 dns=no rev_dns=no fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/avpops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/permissions.so" modparam("auth_db|uri_db|usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 1) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:10.44.9.17:12345") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 27) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer_avp", "inv_timeout") modparam("permissions", "db_mode", 1) modparam("permissions", "trusted_table", "trusted") route { # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Sanity Check Section # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483", "Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len > max_len) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message Overflow"); break; }; # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Record Route Section # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (method!="REGISTER") { record_route(); }; if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Loose Route Section # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (loose_route()) { if ((method=="INVITE" || method=="REFER") && !has_totag()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE") { if (!proxy_authorize("","subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("","0"); break; } else if (!check_from()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=ID"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); }; force_rtp_proxy("l"); }; route(1); break; }; # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Call Type Processing Section # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (uri!=myself) { route(4); route(1); break; }; if (method=="ACK") { route(1); break; } else if (method=="CANCEL") { route(1); break; } else if (method=="INVITE") { route(3); break; } else if (method=="REGISTER") { route(2); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { route(4); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); break; }; route(1); } route[1] { # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Default Message Handler # ----------------------------------------------------------------- t_on_reply("1"); if (!t_relay()) { if (method=="INVITE" && isflagset(6)) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); }; sl_reply_error(); }; } route[2] { # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # REGISTER Message Handler # ---------------------------------------------------------------- if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); fix_nated_register(); force_rport(); }; sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); if (!www_authorize("","subscriber")) { www_challenge("","0"); break; }; if (!check_to()) { sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; } route[3] { # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # INVITE Message Handler # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (!proxy_authorize("","subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("","0"); break; } else if (!check_from()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=ID"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); } lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { route(4); route(1); break; }; if (uri=~"^sip:0217[0-9]*@") { route(4); route(5); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); break; }; route(4); route(1); } route[4] { # ----------------------------------------------------------------- # NAT Traversal Section # ----------------------------------------------------------------- if (isflagset(6)) { force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); } } route[5] { rewritehost("10.177.107.90"); avp_write("i:45", "inv_timeout"); route(1); } onreply_route[1] { if (isflagset(6) && status=~"(180)|(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { if (!search("^Content-Length:[ ]*0")) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; }; if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; }

16 years, 11 months

[Serusers] SIP Express Bundle - let's get started

by Mike Trest - Personal

Hi, The holidays and the new year work load seems to have taken all my time. Anyway, next week, I should be clear of regulatory filings and paperwork. That should give me time to resume building stand alone SER to test prototype of the SER Express Bundle. Any first-draft materials from anyone yet? ..mike..

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] UAC module (openser 1.2.1)

by Antonio Reale

Hi all, I'm trying to use UAC module and I'd like to know if it is possible to configure openser to register on another proxy on start up and wait for incoming calls, instead of use UAC module to terminate calls on an authenticated trunk. Thanks. Regards, Antonio

16 years, 11 months

[Serusers] forking error - branch response sent to uac

by Tomasz Zieleniewski

hi, I encountered following error. I have two user agents register under the same uid. When there is an invite request both ua's ring. When one of them UA1 answers the call, by sending 200 response some strange error occurs. UA1's 200 response is immediately sent to UAC who initiated a call. after this ser sends cancel message to other UA2. The other UA2 responses with 200 to the cancel message and sends response to the initial invite: 487 Request Terminated. After this ser should response with ACK to the second UA2 but it isn't instead it forwards 487 response to UAC who sent the initial invite. Please tell why ser behaves this way? What could be the reason for such behavior? Regards Tomasz

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] Performance of Openser as Presence Server

by Noble Antony T

Hi, Do any one has an idea about the Performance benchmark of Openser as Presence Server..? Like how many Subscribers, how many subscribe/publish/notify messages, it can handle.. [ I want to know how much Subscribers/Subscriptions & how many Subscribe/Notify/Publish messages, Openser can handle. I am using Openser as only Presence Server ( not proxy/registrar )] If anybody have any figures about this performance, please let me know. Thanks -- Noble Antony Thattil.

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] Reg. Proxy authentication

by Padmaja

Hi all, Please see the call flow below: GW1 Proxy GW2 |-----invite----------->| | |<------407-----------| | |-----invite w/cred--->| | | |-----Invite------->| |<------------200 Ok---------------------| |----------------Ack--------------------->| | | | |<----ReInvite -----| | When the proxy receives the Reinvite below from GW 2, should it again challenge it for proxy authentication or simply forward the call to the GW1? The openser proxy in our lab simply forwards the Invite without asking for authentication this time. However, I need to test the situation, where the proxy asks for authentication for the Reinvite. Is this possible? Please let me know. Thanks, Padmaja

16 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2008