sr-users January 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

131 participants
217 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] Revealing Number Dialled

by Jon Farmer

Hi I have some users successfully using openser and they are able to make and receive calls with any problems. I now want to provide inbound service from other telephone numbers to these registed users and want to be able to put the number dialled into the SIP header. However I am unsure how to represent this in the SIP message. Can anyone help me? TIA Jon __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

16 years, 3 months

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Schema for OpenSER LDAP module

by Schumann Sebastian

Thanks Christian! I will use this module then in addition, didn't actually realize it is available for OpenSER :-( So far, I just checked the LDAP module, and on http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/tutorials:openser-auth-ldap was no hint on the H.350.4 module when showing the sample LDAP tree. I will try to implement the H.350.4 into my LDAP server and authenticate against it with OpenSER and LDAP+H.350 module. Thanks so far! Best regards Sebastian -----Original Message----- From: Christian Schlatter [mailto:cs@unc.edu] Sent: Friday, 25. January 2008 4:57 PM To: Schumann Sebastian Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Schema for OpenSER LDAP module Sebastian, There is an ITU-T Recommendation called H.350 that standardizes LDAP schemas for storing SIP (and other session signaling protocols) account data. The documentation of the OpenSER 1.3 H350 module (http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/h350.html) further describes this standard. The "H.350 Cookbook" includes LDAP schema files ready for use with different LDAP server implementations: http://metric.it.uab.edu/vnet/cookbook/v2.1/node143.html /Christian Schumann Sebastian wrote: > Dear all > > I am wondering whether there is a schema file for OpenSER LDAP module, > to use at the LDAP server for data storage? > > On the tutorial from OpenSER Wiki, e.g. the attributes SIPUserName and > SIPPassword are used, but no standard schema actually defines them acc. > my research. > > Any help with this is as always appreciated! > > Thanks and a nice weekend to all of you! > > Regards > Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] Schema for OpenSER LDAP module

by Schumann Sebastian

Dear all I am wondering whether there is a schema file for OpenSER LDAP module, to use at the LDAP server for data storage? On the tutorial from OpenSER Wiki, e.g. the attributes SIPUserName and SIPPassword are used, but no standard schema actually defines them acc. my research. Any help with this is as always appreciated! Thanks and a nice weekend to all of you! Regards Sebastian

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSUSE packages required

by Dowling, Dan (Com US)

Hi, Can anyone tell me how to best determine which OpenSUSE packages are required for openser when used with asterisk? Best regards, Dan

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] presence: difference between watchers and active_watchers

by Klaus Darilion

Hi! Can someone explain me please the difference between between watchers and active_watchers? If I understand correctly, active_watchers are the SIP clients which have SUBSCRIBEd and thus will receive NOTIFYs. But what are "watchers"? regards klaus

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] Intial INVITES without SDP

by Patrick Miccio

Hi @ all, I am fighting a pretty annoying problem at the moment. As described in rfc3261 / 13.2.1 Creating the Initial INVITE o The initial offer MUST be in either an INVITE or, if not there, in the first reliable non-failure message from the UAS back to the UAC. In this specification, that is the final 2xx response. My problem is the following: I receive a initial INVITE without SDP, forward it to a PSTN Gateway. >From the Gateway I receive the 200 OK with SDP offer. In the onreply_route I make a call to the mediaproxy use_media_proxy(); Unfortunately use_media_proxy() seems to make a lookup command when used in a reply route. I would need to make a request command which would create the media session and then do a lookup with the ACK from the UAC. Is there a way around this? cheers, Patrick. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for your cooperation. Information pursuant to paragraph 14 Austrian Companies Code: UPC Austria GmbH; Registered Office: Wolfganggasse 58-60, 1120 Vienna Company Register Number: FN 189858d at the Commercial Court of Vienna

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] test

by NP南頻電信黃明杰網路電話部 jeff

南頻電信股份有限公司 NP Telecom Co., Ltd. 網路電話部 VOIP Dept 黃明杰 Jeff Huang E-Mail：jeff(a)np.net.tw 公司電話(Tel)：+886-2-8226-5008 Ext：867 公司網路代表號：070-288-1122 公司傳真(FAX)：+886-2-8226-5558 公司地址：23562台北縣中和市建八路十六號七樓之一 7F-1, NO. 16, Jian-ba Rd., Chung-ho City 23562, Taipei County, Taiwan, R.O.C. 公司網址：www.np.net.tw 統一編號：89459253 匯款銀行：彰化銀行雙和分行匯款帳號：5678-01-00999-1-00

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] WeSIP: Not SER connector available - Check the Configuration, new user issue help!

by rahul kadian

Hi, I am trying to configure WESIP and trying to run demo application "Click2dial" Everything seems to ve connected properly according to logs But when I call the manager Web-GUI I get as a status of OpenSER: "Not SER connector available - Check the Configuration" What might be the reason for this. Also while trying to run Click2dial , i get the error code "Call failed with code 2" or sometimes with code 3. Have checked the confi and server.xml according to the docs and seem to be running fine. If someone can let me know any solution to this , it would be of great help. -- Regards, Rahul.

16 years, 3 months

[OpenSER-Users] SVN checkout of 1.2.3?

by Tobias Lindgren

Hi, I must be getting really tired, but checking out 1.2 from svn only brings me up to 1.2.2, not 1.2.3? Same with latest snapshot from 1.2. # $Id: ChangeLog 2609 2007-08-16 14:02:25Z miconda $ Br, /Tobias

16 years, 3 months

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute help..

by Henning Westerholt

On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Ricardo Martinez wrote: > Thanks Henning.... > Please see my answers below : > > [..] > According to this,in the "failure route" is checked if receives from the > gateway the messages "408" or "5XX", but since the gateway is offline there > is no way to receive any response from it. So, what is the behaviour of > the module here?. It keeps sending the calls to the de-2.carrier1 and > de-3.carrier1 gateways? or keeps sending the calls between the 3 gateways? Hi, this has nothing to do with the behaviour of carrierroute.. OpenSER will try to resend the invite, and then generate a local 408 after the timer of the tm module run out. And then you can enter a failure route. > > 2.- Now, suppose that "de-1.carrier1" gateway is only full, so i can > > probably have a reply from the gateway (maybe a "480" message"), so the > > carrierroute module now tries with a failover route (defa.carrier1?) or > > tries with any of the other two gateways still not full? > > I suppose you mean that 'de-1' is overloaded. No, the next domain is not > automatically entered. This deficiency is known, and will be addressed in > the future. But this code is not ready yet for a release. > > Yes sorry.. i meant "de-1" is overloaded, so in this case, i can receive a > "408" Message from the gateway indicating maybe "overload". So i handle > the answer with the failure route[2], so all the calls answered with the > "408" are re-routed to the "domain 1" route isn't?. Wouldn't be more > accurate to keep sending calls to the other gateways (de-2 and de-3)? > insted of make a failover to a default route? since the other two gateways > are not overloaded...... Well, 408 is not the right error for overloading, more appropriate would be 503. Carrierroute has no knowledge of the meaning and your policy regarding a 408/ 503, let alone that the two other gws are not overloaded.. A hardcoded logic in this module would not fit to everybody. At the moment you must go with the failure_routes, or use the lcr module instead. In the future there will be probably some better solution, as i wrote in my first mail. Cheers, Henning

16 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2008