sr-users January 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

131 participants
217 discussions

by Jonathan Creasy

I am sending an INVITE to Box A for "F+18007622265@boxa" Part of GW Table: gw_name grp_id ip_addr port uri_scheme transport strip prefix toll-free failover 5 XXXXXXXX /NULL/ /NULL/ /NULL/ 1 Part of LCR Table: id prefix from_uri grp_id priority 170 F+1800 5 1 This sends the call to box B XXXXXXXX per the GW table: Jan 29 04:03:16 boxb-sip /usr/local/sbin/openser[28118]: Req 41070 INVITE From <sip:asterisk@XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX> To <sip:F+18007622265@boxa> RURI <sip:+18007622265@boxb> It strips the F off in the RURI field but not in the TO field so boxb then fails the call as it doesn't know how to route a call to F+1800NXXXXXX. What can I do to make it re-format the to: field? The original problem I am trying to solve is that toll-free calls are routed to a system. If that system cannot handle the call I want that system to then place the call back to the OpenSER box (boxa) but instead of using the grp_id of 2 that +1800 calls would go to (and route to the system in question), I want to indicate that boxa should use group 5 and send the calls to boxb. There is probably a very easy way of doing this which doesn't involve a mangled dial string but I'm missing it so if anyone would like to assist me with this that would be great.

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] [OT] Any UAC sending INVITE with empty SDP?

by Iñaki Baz Castillo

Hi, in order to try managing NAT when the SDP negoziation is done via "200 OK" - "ACK" (instead of "INVITE - "200 OK") I need a UAC that can send INVITE with empty SDP in order to force the called to generate the SDP offer in the reply. Is there any UAC allowing it? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Increased heap size.

by Sergio Gutierrez

Hello everybody. Currently, I am watching a non normal behaviour in OpenSER 1.2.1, no tls. My operating System is Solaris 10, running on Sparc The process which appears as timer, is consuming almost the 50% of the whole physical memory of the machine. After a deep inspection of memory distribution, appears that the most of memory consumption is at process heap, as presented with pmap(1M) command: 1978: /toip/sbin/openser -n 9 -m 256 -f /toip/etc/openser/prueba1.cfg Address Kbytes RSS Anon Locked Mode Mapped File 00010000 760 752 - - r-x-- openser 000DC000 24 24 24 - rwx-- openser 000E2000 56 32 24 - rwx-- [ anon ] 000F0000 192 128 - - rwx-- openser 00120000 3906432 3906432 3627200 - rwx-- [ heap ] EE800000 262144 3624 - - rw-s- [ anon ] ... Thanks in advance for any hint about it. Best regards. Sergio Gutiérrez. EPM Telecomunicaciones S.A. E.S.P. Medellin, Colombia.

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] dual nic at single machine openser

by flatworm

I got some routing problem configuring two NICs at debian. Openser is listening all possible network interface. I've configured one for static global IP address and one for internal private IP address. The reason why I've configured like this is for maintenance and development purpose. The static global IP line is for the service and the private IP line is for monitoring and administrations. But when I try to connect to openser of static global IP address, it was failed to register. 1) My machine was using private IP address of same subnet of openser connected to our private network. 2) My machine is trying to connect openser of static global IP address. In case of configuring dual NICs on Openser machine, is there any routing problem ? So I restricted the openser only listening static global IP address then it allows connection and succeeds in registration.

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Implementing the Ringing Groups

by raviprakash sunkara

Hello Users Like Asterisk PBX I implemented the Ringing Group like Ring all, Round Robin and Memory Hunt , RingAll and Round Robin Ringing is working fine with the following UserAgent LinkSys 941 and X-lite, GrandStream, And SJphones, with these is working, When comes to Memory Hunt Ring feature only with Sjphone are working fine, but with User Agent not working the problem is Previous User-Agent number is Not ringing. Can any one tell me solution Why these user-Agents are not working ........ Here is my Memory Hunt logic First A rings Second time A and B rings ( in Failure route Ist time ) Third Time A, B and C ( in Failure route 2 nd time ) Fourth time A, B,C and D rings ( in Failure route 3 time ) -- Thanks &Regards Ravi Prakash Sunkara VoIP Development Tech Lead

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Are there are any special settings to run openser over SCTP?

by rajat.dudeja＠tcs.com

16 years, 10 months

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to store various values in an AVP?

by Iñaki Baz Castillo

El Sábado, 26 de Enero de 2008, escribió: > Hello, > > Why not just make allowed_from_numbers a regex, and feed it directly? > I.e. > > $avp(allowed_from_numbers) = "(100|200|300|400)"; > > if($avp(allowed_from_numbers) =~ $fU){ > # allowed > } else { > # not allowed > } > > > Hope this helps! Yes, sure, it's a good idea ;) Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Fw: Are there are any special settings to run openser over SCTP?

by rajat.dudeja＠tcs.com

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] rtpproxy seems to be idle

by Kovács Zoltán

Hi, my plan is to give the possibility for multiple VoIP users within the same LAN to call each other using OpenSER as the SIP server. I found that if there is a NATed LAN, two different VoIP users inside the NATed LAN cannot talk to each other properly, because IP parts of the RTP packets are of the form of the local network and it is not acceptable by the VoIP software which is prepared for the IP of the router instead. (I hope I understand clearly what is going on here.) As a workaround, I found a suggestion in the internet: using rtpproxy with OpenSER. As I can understand, all RTP packets are sent to the rtpproxy process via OpenSER (nathelper module). rtpproxy will behave as a bridge between the two NATed VoIP clients lying in the same LAN. Both clients will initiate their RTP/UDP traffic on their own side and answers will come from the rtpproxy process just for the same UDP pipe. Using this method the clients do not need to allow incoming UDP traffic, only outgoing traffic should be enabled (which is usually allowed by default in most LANs). Here comes my question. I successfully set up OpenSER (version 1.1.x, but I will migrate to 1.2.x soon). I think I also successfully set up rtpproxy, but it seems that there is no real traffic between OpenSER and rtpproxy. Here I attach my command line for running rtpproxy ( 200.200.200.200 is my public IP of the OpenSER server host; I run rtpproxy on the same server). -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- # rtpproxy -f -l 200.200.200.200 -s unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock -r /home/rtpproxy -S /home/rtpproxy.work rtpproxy started, pid 24568 received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "V" sending reply "20040107 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "VF 20050322" sending reply "1 " received command "U 3331228473621-29341876517920(a)160.114.144.65 160.114.144.65 10004 196215176;1" new session 3331228473621-29341876517920(a)160.114.144.65 , tag 196215176;1 requested, type strong new session on a port 35000 created, tag 196215176;1 pre-filling caller's address with 160.114.144.65:10004 sending reply "35000 212.92.3.218 " session timeout RTP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0 dropped RTCP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0 dropped session on ports 35000/0 is cleaned up -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- My debug=7 output for OpenSER, filtered for the string "rtp" comes here (I had to chown openser.openser /var/run/rtpproxy* for OpenSER to make it possible to communicate with rtpproxy at all): -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- # tail -f daemon.log | grep rtp Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: set_mod_param_regex: found <rtpproxy_sock> in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: set_mod_param_regex: found <rtpproxy_disable> in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: set_mod_param_regex: found <rtpproxy_disable_tout> in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: set_mod_param_regex: found <rtpproxy_tout> in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: set_mod_param_regex: found <rtpproxy_retr> in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: find_cmd_export_t: found <force_rtp_proxy>(0) in module nathelper [/usr/lib/openser/modules/] Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall openser: f<force_rtp_proxy> Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25093]: fixing force_rtp_proxy, line 443 Jan 15 00:27:39 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25095]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25096]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25098]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25100]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25106]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25105]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25117]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25103]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25108]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25104]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25112]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25094]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25113]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25093]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25111]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25122]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25118]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25123]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25097]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25107]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25125]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25120]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25115]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25110]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25119]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25116]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25124]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25114]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25121]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25099]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25102]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25109]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:27:40 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25101]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> found, support for it enabled Jan 15 00:28:21 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25112]: force_rtp_proxy2: proxy reply: 35000 212.92.3.218 Jan 15 00:28:27 firewall /usr/sbin/openser[25114]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:77, new: 16, rest: 780 msg= SIP/2.0 200 Ok^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 160.114.144.65:1024;branch=z9hG4bK27994379851422672^M From: 06212527755 <sip:06212527755@sip.ephone.hu:5060>;tag=196215176^M To: 06212527722 < sip:06212527722@sip.ephone.hu:5060>;tag=7816428^M Contact: < sip:06212527722@160.114.144.65:5060>^M Record-Route: <sip:200.200.200.200;lr;ftag=196215176>^M Call-ID: 3331228473621-29341876517920(a)160.114.144.65^M CSeq: 1 INVITE^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Server: X-Lite release 1105d^M Content-Length: 320^M ^M v=0^M o=06212527722 2057424946 2057430520 IN IP4 160.114.144.65^M s=X-Lite^M c=IN IP4 160.114.144.65^M t=0 0^M m=audio 8000 RTP/AVP 0 8 3 98 97 101^M a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000^M a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000^M a=rtpmap:3 gsm/8000^M a=rtpmap:98 iLBC/8000^M a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000^M a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000^M a=fmtp:101 0-15^M a=sendrecv^M -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- My nathelper related part of openser.cfg comes here: -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- loadmodule " nathelper.so" modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 60) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", 42) modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock") modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 0) modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable_tout", 60) modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_tout", 1) modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_retr", 5) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "OPTIONS") -------------------------8X snip here------------------------------- Of course, directories /home/rtpproxy* are empty. Could somebody please help me why there is no media stream between OpenSER and rtpproxy? Your help is greatly appreciated in advance. I am using Debian Etch. Best regards, Zoltan

16 years, 11 months

[OpenSER-Users] Is possible to store various values in an AVP?

by Iñaki Baz Castillo

Hi, I'd like to store in an AVP various posible values and load it with "load_credentials" parameter of "auth" module. The DB column would be: "allowed_from_numbers" AndI'd like to store there the valid values a subscribe can use as From username. For example: allowed_from_numbers = "200;201;200" So in OpenSer I do: if ($avp(allowed_from_numbers) == $fU) route(FROM_VALID); But unfortunatelly I think this is not possible, is it? which would be the required syntax to store various values? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

16 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2008