Hi,
192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167
Could it be that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ?
On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters.
Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?)
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17.
But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario?
If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module.
Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server.
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska.
> Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you.
> Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long.
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)?
> Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed.
> > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM
> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> >
> > Hi,
> > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log.
> >
> > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE).
> > Vaclav
> >
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Which level of debug should I use ?
> > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
> > >
> > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
> > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ilker
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
> > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> > >
> > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module.
> > >
> > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
> > > There should be lots of messages.
> > >
> > > Vaclav
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> > > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook.
> > > > Everything seems to work except presence messages.
> > > >
> > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> > > > Only these lines:
> > > >
> > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no
> > > > socket found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> > > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2
> > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify
> > > > returned -7 May 2
> > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket
> > > > found May
> > > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > > > found
> > > >
> > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> > > > I need help desperately.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > ilker
> > > >
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010A0601/07074F05/02054D06/122…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
I am trying to use IM with ser. Followed the installation procedures as suggested in the presence hand book and running the sample config with db that comes in it but I have the following error in it:
------------------------------------------------
rls_mod_init(): 'xcap_root' not set (global XCAP root)!
0(21638) init_mod(): Error while initializing module rls
ERROR: error while initializing modules
------------------------------------------------
I have compiled and installed the sip_router from its cvs source but I had ignore one error message sercmd not compiled; not sure if it has anything to do with it.
thanks a lot,
suraj
Hi all, I had this problem in the morning so I had to restar ser again to make it work..
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: No ISA tormenta card found at d0000
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Unloaded
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: init_module: Input/output error
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg
May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: insmod char-major-196 failed
I'm not really confident with SER so anyone who can explain me what the problem can be? maybe there's a module that cannot be loaded?
please help me
thanks
Giuseppe
Hi !
I'm new to SER and I would like to know if it is possible to get the
content-type of a message and to use it in ser.cfg like we can do
with status (i.e. if (!(status =~ "183")) for instance). I would
like SER to behave according to the content-type of some SIP messages
and therefore I need a way to get this information about the messages.
Thank you for your help
Regards
Steve
Btw, I've seen following two lines in the beginning of the log:
May 2 13:29:15 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19985]: using 'none' rls-subscription authorization!
May 2 13:29:15 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19985]: using 'none' subscription authorization for watcher info!
Could they be related ?
How can I change these to xcap ?
Thanks,
ilker
________________________________
From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:15 PM
To: 'Vaclav Kubart'
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
Hi,
I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska.
Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you.
Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long.
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)?
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed.
> Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ?
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> Hi,
> debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log.
>
> If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE).
> Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Which level of debug should I use ?
> > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
> >
> > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
> > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> >
> > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module.
> >
> > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
> > There should be lots of messages.
> >
> > Vaclav
> >
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
> > >
> > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook.
> > > Everything seems to work except presence messages.
> > >
> > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> > > Only these lines:
> > >
> > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2
> > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify
> > > returned -7 May 2
> > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found
> > > May
> > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > > found
> > >
> > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> > > I need help desperately.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > ilker
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM
> > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right?
> > > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more.
> > > I don't see any problems... :-(
> > >
> > > Vaclav
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > > Hi Vaclav,
> > > >
> > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output.
> > > >
> > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events.
> > > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ?
> > > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ?
> > > >
> > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your help.
> > > >
> > > > ilker
>
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020E0604/07044D04/01034D03/016…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be
sent to 192.168.2.17.
But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in
Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the
flow belong to the same scenario?
If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module.
Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server.
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska.
> Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you.
> Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long.
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)?
> Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed.
> > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM
> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> >
> > Hi,
> > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log.
> >
> > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE).
> > Vaclav
> >
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Which level of debug should I use ?
> > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
> > >
> > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
> > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ilker
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
> > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> > >
> > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module.
> > >
> > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
> > > There should be lots of messages.
> > >
> > > Vaclav
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> > > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook.
> > > > Everything seems to work except presence messages.
> > > >
> > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> > > > Only these lines:
> > > >
> > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > > > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> > > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2
> > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify
> > > > returned -7 May 2
> > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found
> > > > May
> > > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > > > found
> > > >
> > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> > > > I need help desperately.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > ilker
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM
> > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right?
> > > > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more.
> > > > I don't see any problems... :-(
> > > >
> > > > Vaclav
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > > > Hi Vaclav,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output.
> > > > >
> > > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events.
> > > > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ?
> > > > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ?
> > > > >
> > > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your help.
> > > > >
> > > > > ilker
> >
>
>
>
>
> <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090704/07004405/00024C03/101…>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
> This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
I've sent an attachment (including debug logs as you requested) to you. Please inform me if you don't receive it.
Thanks,
ilker
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0A090504/07064D05/09054E03/191…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Thanks,
That was the problem...
Now I'm getting the logs.
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Michal Matyska
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:35 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
Hi,
You need check your syslogd configuration file, as the messages with severity level "debug" might become unused.
/etc/syslogd.conf should contain lines like this:
*.=debug;\
auth,authpriv.none;\
news.none;mail.none -/var/log/debug
If you add the line, don't forget to restart syslog deamon.
Or you can set the error reporting to the stderr handle and then run ser with stderr redirected to file. If log_stderr is not defined in your config file, you can use -E parameter to achieve that:
ser -E 2> ser_err.log
Michal
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which level of debug should I use ?
> debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
>
> Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
> Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010C0504/0404490C/02064E03/824…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
Which level of debug should I use ?
debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module.
Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
There should be lots of messages.
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
>
> I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook.
> Everything seems to work except presence messages.
>
> After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> Only these lines:
>
> May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 10:56:49
> sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 2
> 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found May
> 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found
>
> If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> I need help desperately.
>
> Regards,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> Hi,
> as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right?
> Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more.
> I don't see any problems... :-(
>
> Vaclav
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi Vaclav,
> >
> > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output.
> >
> > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events.
> > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ?
> > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ?
> >
> > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > ilker
> >
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/030A0601/04014E01/090A4D06/202…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed.
Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
Hi,
debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log.
If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE).
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which level of debug should I use ?
> debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
>
> Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
> Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module.
>
> Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
> There should be lots of messages.
>
> Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
> >
> > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook.
> > Everything seems to work except presence messages.
> >
> > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> > Only these lines:
> >
> > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2
> > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify
> > returned -7 May 2
> > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found
> > May
> > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found
> >
> > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> > I need help desperately.
> >
> > Regards,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM
> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
> >
> > Hi,
> > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right?
> > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more.
> > I don't see any problems... :-(
> >
> > Vaclav
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > Hi Vaclav,
> > >
> > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output.
> > >
> > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events.
> > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ?
> > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ?
> > >
> > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > ilker
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010C0605/07024D03/02044D02/724…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
