I was playing around with the ctd.sh script and my SER setup w/ ATA-186
clients. I got it to work by adding a simple "ACK" to the ctd script
after the INVITE response and before the REFER. The documentation page
indicates that this ACK happens in the ctd example, but running a
tcpdump/ngrep on the SER machine showed that it never did.
The only problem I have is that when I send an ack through the fifo, it
looks like SER is waiting for a response, so it takes a good 20 seconds or
so before it gives up and moves onto the REFER.
Is there an easy way to convince SER to not wait for a response to an ACK
through the FIFO? I thought there was a fifo command to do this but
couldn't find one...
Also for anybody who cares, the REFER method works with the ATA-186
firmware 2.16 and higher, but I also created a modified version of the ctd
script that completed the calls using the BYE/Also method that works on
pre-2.16 ATAs.
- Mike
Pablo, serias tan amable de explicarme en "castellano" como hiciste para que
ande el vm. y si me pasas los cfg te lo vos a agradecer.
Saludos
A su Disposición.
Sergio Gerardo Festa
At 06:22 PM 11/5/2003, Dan Haynes wrote:
>Do I make the server responsible for a domain just with the export command
>or is there other configuration I must do?
by setting up a DNS name to refer to the IP address and by setting your
ser script to process requests for such a domain (as opposed to
forwarding them somewhere else). The condition may by expressed
as uri==myself (with aliases set to the domain name question) or
uri=="SOME_REG_EXP).
> Just to be clear, can I make the
>domain name actually be foo.bar just with the export and changing the realm
>value, or are there other things that this depends on?\
domain name can be in theory different from authentication realm.
However, there are some impleementations which can't deal with it
(Windows Messenger) and it is generally a good practice to keep
both same.
-jiri
Do I make the server responsible for a domain just with the export command
or is there other configuration I must do? Just to be clear, can I make the
domain name actually be foo.bar just with the export and changing the realm
value, or are there other things that this depends on?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Dan Haynes; 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Subject: Re: [Serusers] sip_domain
it should be name of domain for which the server is responsible
and it should be the same as realm value in authentication commands
of your ser script.
-jiri
At 05:52 PM 11/5/2003, Dan Haynes wrote:
>I see in the setup guides to do
>
>export SIP_DOMAIN="foo.bar"
>
>Does it matter what this value is, ie does it need to coorespond to what I
>have in /etc/hosts?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
it should be name of domain for which the server is responsible
and it should be the same as realm value in authentication commands
of your ser script.
-jiri
At 05:52 PM 11/5/2003, Dan Haynes wrote:
>I see in the setup guides to do
>
>export SIP_DOMAIN="foo.bar"
>
>Does it matter what this value is, ie does it need to coorespond to what I
>have in /etc/hosts?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
I see in the setup guides to do
export SIP_DOMAIN="foo.bar"
Does it matter what this value is, ie does it need to coorespond to what I
have in /etc/hosts?
Hi there,
would you share the script?
Thank you in advance,
Harry
Dr. Harry Behrens
Projektleitung BIB3R
DAI Labor - Technische Universität Berlin
Sekretariat GOR 1-1, Franklinstrasse 28/29, 10587 Berlin
Fon: +49 30 314 23383
Fax: +49 30 314 21799
Email: harry.behrens(a)dai-labor.de
http://www.dai-labor.de <http://www.dai-labor.de/>
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: voice [mailto:voice@wmail.plala.or.jp]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2003 15:36
An: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Betreff: [Serusers] running SER + SEMS + proxy ,It is possible by one machine.
running SER + SEMS + proxy , It is possible by one machine.
A script is applied and it becomes possible.
Voice lab inc. (Saitama Japan)
Hi,
I'm trying to enable vm on ser 0.8.11, without success.
>From the mailing list I see that you cannot run ser as a sip proxy with vm
enabled in the same process, you need to have 2 instances of ser.
Is this the only way to use vm in ser ?
Is there a config file example that support PSTN forwarding as well as vm
support for the users ?
Thanks.
Samy.
