Bon jour à tout le monde,
I have other news about my investigation on Mediaproxy and SER in the same Lan. In the first test i used X-lite, as UA clients, running on windowsXP and i saw that RTP traffic didn't pass through MEDIAproxy (IP 192.168.123.186). Now i'm using the client "Express Talk" runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.168) and X-lite runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.10) and I see that MEDIAproxy work correctly because works as "man in the middle" and proxies the RTP packets between two clients. Seems that it's necessary that one of two clients must be Express Talk, in order to Mediaproxy work correctly. I observe that, if one client is Express Talk, the second client could be X-lite or Yate or TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/) and MediaProxy work OK.
But why Mediaproxy work correctly only if i use "Express Talk" as one peer client?? Any ideas?
Target clients for my operational environment will be TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/) and i want that using them the RTP packet pass through Mediaproxy. There's anyone (sherlock holmes) in the forum that could solve the mystery? thanks a lot.
Hi all, i'm newbie in SER, I want to route RTP packets between
2
computers with x-lite client voip in the same network through Mediaproxy. I know this may have no sense, but it's just a test configuration. The call use_media_proxy() seems to have no effect, the RTP packets go directly from one computer to another, no packet
trough Mediaproxy.
This is my environment: SER and Mediaproxy on the
same PC
(192.168.123.186) X-lite client_A running on 192.168.123.10 X-lite client_B running on 192.168.123.168 Client_A call Client_B
that accept,
but mediaproxy refuses to proxy the call. Is
mediaproxy
working just between different networks or it's an error
in my
configuration file? Please help me. Any suggestions? Orazio
Check the "Firewall Traversal-setting (STUN, ICE, rport, outbound proxy etc.) in your xlite-clients. As I understand it, the MediaProxy (module + server) is a network/server-side NAT-solution, xlite has a lot of "client-side" NAT-traversal - they can be "in conflict".
And as both your servers and clients are on private IP-addresses - if either xlite presents a public address (obtained using STUN?), that could be the problem.
/Fredrik
----- Original Message ----- From: pistara_bros@tin.it To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER+Mediaproxy + X-LITE in the same LAN.
Bon jour à tout le monde,
I have other news about my investigation on Mediaproxy and SER in the same Lan. In the first test i used X-lite, as UA clients, running on windowsXP and i saw that RTP traffic didn't pass through MEDIAproxy (IP 192.168.123.186). Now i'm using the client "Express Talk" runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.168) and X-lite runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.10) and I see that MEDIAproxy work correctly because works as "man in the middle" and proxies the RTP packets between two clients. Seems that it's necessary that one of two clients must be Express Talk, in order to Mediaproxy work correctly. I observe that, if one client is Express Talk, the second client could be X-lite or Yate or TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/) and MediaProxy work OK.
But why Mediaproxy work correctly only if i use "Express Talk" as one peer client?? Any ideas?
Target clients for my operational environment will be TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/) and i want that using them the RTP packet pass through Mediaproxy. There's anyone (sherlock holmes) in the forum that could solve the mystery? thanks a lot.
Hi all, i'm newbie in SER, I want to route RTP packets between
2
computers with x-lite client voip in the same network through Mediaproxy. I know this may have no sense, but it's just a test configuration. The call use_media_proxy() seems to have no effect, the RTP packets go directly from one computer to another, no packet
trough Mediaproxy.
This is my environment: SER and Mediaproxy on the
same PC
(192.168.123.186) X-lite client_A running on 192.168.123.10 X-lite client_B running on 192.168.123.168 Client_A call Client_B
that accept,
but mediaproxy refuses to proxy the call. Is
mediaproxy
working just between different networks or it's an error
in my
configuration file? Please help me. Any suggestions? Orazio
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers