26 Feb
2020
26 Feb
'20
1:20 a.m.
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header
with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to
be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass
whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
26 Feb
26 Feb
2:33 a.m.
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE
or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a
record route
header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and
everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log
error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and
bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
2:48 a.m.
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example
183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or
when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header
with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to
be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass
whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
2:59 a.m.
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog
requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests
(INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Daniel Greenwald
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200
OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda@gmail.com<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling
requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV
record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I
get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever
check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin -
www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin --
www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
3:38 a.m.
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of
freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am
using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies
or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on
initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
*From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *Daniel
Greenwald
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
*To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null
send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example
183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or
when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header
with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to
be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass
whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
1:11 p.m.
Hello,
so it is more about transparently replacing one header in both directions. You could
probably implement something like this with the help of the dialog module, or more
lightweight with the htable module and normal header texops operations. Maybe the topo*
modules are also worth a look for you, but they might be doing too much in this
scenario.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: Daniel Greenwald <dgreenwald(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 11:39 PM
To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>rg>;
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes
and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in
contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt
<hw@skalatan.de<mailto:hw@skalatan.de>> wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog
requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests
(INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>>
On Behalf Of Daniel Greenwald
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200
OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda@gmail.com<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling
requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV
record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I
get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever
check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin -
www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin --
www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
1:31 p.m.
Hello,
if you control the freeswitches or change where they send
traffic/receive traffic, then I recommend to use two listen parameters
with advertise address, like:
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5060 advertise publicsrv:5060
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080
and carriers will be linked to my.ip.ad.dr:5060, while for freeswitch
you use udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080. You can use
force_send_socket()/set_send_socket() or $fs to enforce a specific
socket for sending traffic (e.g., towards freeswitch or carriers).
There will be two record-route headers, but, besides enforcing sockets,
everything else will be done automatically.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 23:38, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction
of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I
am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the
carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de
<mailto:hw@skalatan.de>> wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these
replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are
usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE
etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/>
*From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> *On Behalf Of
*Daniel Greenwald
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
*To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>
*Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes
null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for
example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the
initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog
(re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a
record route header with an SRV record. The header is
added correctly and everything appears to be working fine
however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053
INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]:
lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053
INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]:
lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually
add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
<http://www.asipto.com>
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
11:02 p.m.
Yes but 2 problems with this:
1) listen parameter does not seem to accept an SRV or hostname
listen=udp:MYPRIVATEIP:EXTERNALPORT advertise EXTERNALHOSTNAME
causes the listen line to be ignored
2) My goal is not to do any state replication so I only want the SRV in
record-route not VIA. VIA will still have IP. These are very light configs
(no Dialog or backends etc) If a kamailio goes away, an in-dialog request
should still hit another kamailio and the call will progress as if nothing
happened. (Yes, in-progress Transactions will still fail but that's
acceptable vs cost of TM replication)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:31 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
if you control the freeswitches or change where they send traffic/receive
traffic, then I recommend to use two listen parameters with advertise
address, like:
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5060 advertise publicsrv:5060
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080
and carriers will be linked to my.ip.ad.dr:5060, while for freeswitch you
use udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080. You can use
force_send_socket()/set_send_socket() or $fs to enforce a specific socket
for sending traffic (e.g., towards freeswitch or carriers).
There will be two record-route headers, but, besides enforcing sockets,
everything else will be done automatically.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 23:38, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of
freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am
using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies
or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on
initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
*From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *Daniel
Greenwald
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
*To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null
send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for
example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or
when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route
header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything
appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL:
cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core>
[core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and
bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
1531
days inactive
1532
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel Greenwald -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Henning Westerholt