Hello,
so it is more about transparently replacing one header in both directions. You could probably implement something like this with the help of the dialog module, or more lightweight with
the htable module and normal header texops operations. Maybe the topo* modules are also worth a look for you, but they might be doing too much in this scenario.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt –
https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services –
https://gilawa.com
From: Daniel Greenwald <dgreenwald@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 11:39 PM
To: Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the
carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de> wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Daniel Greenwald
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM
To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
DanielOn 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
_______________________________________________Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users--Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/micondaKamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.comKamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com