Hi All,
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for my company needs suggestion on SER version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like waiting transaction, extra connection to mysql, so which version should I roll out.
thanks arun
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Kumar arunvoip@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for my company needs suggestion on SER version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like waiting transaction, extra connection to mysql, so which version should I roll out.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2008-August/012892.html
Hope it helps,
Hi Victor & Arun,
Which is the up to date SER version? I can just down ser 0.9.6 on iptel website but when I register to iptel.org the server indicate it's version is 2.1.0-dev23-make.
May I get this version ser somewhere?
----
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.57.39.114:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8q00ttgepthc6u0u8rhp57m;rport=10009;received=220.197.157.133 From: sip:cdvoip3@iptel.org;tag=61fgttlqn5hc79q48rhq To: sip:cdvoip3@iptel.org;tag=b98f1230ac1a7949bf499aa7f9ea7038.bad9 CSeq: 333613 REGISTER Call-ID: YtIeZyeuoIdK0ArzvPCC1C1iQ3YPvF Expires: 600 Min-Expires: 240 WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="iptel.org", nonce="SKUP4EilD9a7q1HsqxFT8Equkrtq95CFm1Z7+4E=", qop="auth" Server: Sip EXpress router (2.1.0-dev23-make (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 213.192.59.75:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=23231 req_src_ip=220.197.157.133 req_src_port=10009 in_uri=sip:iptel.org;transport=UDP out_uri=sip:iptel.org;transport=UDP via_cnt==1"
---
Best regards, Steven Wu
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org 代表 Victor Pascual ávila Sent: 2008-8-28 (星期四) 15:41 To: Arun Kumar Cc: SER Users Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER Version
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Kumar arunvoip@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for my company needs suggestion on SER version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like waiting transaction, extra connection to mysql, so which version should I roll out.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2008-August/012892.html
Hope it helps,
2008/8/28 Steven Wu Steven.Wu@teleca.com
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers, -- Victor Pascual Ávila
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org? Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy dropped our ACK in double hold case. Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT box has some problem. So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking. Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
Best regards, Steven Wu
________________________________
From: Victor Pascual ávila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com] Sent: 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11 To: Steven Wu Cc: Arun Kumar; SER Users Subject: Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu Steven.Wu@teleca.com
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers, -- Victor Pascual ávila
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy dropped our ACK in double hold case. Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking. Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
Best regards, Steven Wu
*From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com] *Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11 *To:* Steven Wu *Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users *Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu Steven.Wu@teleca.com
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
Victor Pascual A'vila
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2008/8/29 Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org:
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Excuse me Steven, I just missed your message.
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy dropped our ACK in double hold case. Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
Are you using ALG?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking. Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
You can find examples in [1].
[1] http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg
Hope this helps,
Victor Pascual Avila wrote:
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Excuse me Steven, I just missed your message.
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy dropped our ACK in double hold case. Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
Are you using ALG?
I'm not sure, because I can't check my NAT box. But it seems like that.
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking. Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
You can find examples in [1].
[1] http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg
Hope this helps,
Thank you!
I'll try my SER 2.0 with this config file
-- Victor Pascual ávila
2008/8/30 Steven Wu Steven.Wu@teleca.com:
I'll try my SER 2.0 with this config file
Note that you may only need to use part of it-- Please, read it carefully, specially applicability and requirements sections.
Thank you for flying ser :-)
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
What kind of?
I have tested with ser-2.0, Our UA still has some problem when use SER 2.0. 200OK was dropped in double hold case. The scenario is:
UA1 SER UA2 INVITE-> I NVITE-> 200OK<- 200OK<- ACK-> ACK->
INVITE(sendonly)<- INVITE(sendonly)<- 200OK(recvonly)-> 200OK(recvonly)-> ACK<- ACK<-
INVITE(inactive)-> INVITE(inactive)-> 200OK(inactive)<- SER dropped this 200OK
UA1 use TCP connect to SER UA2 use UDP connect to SER
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org 代表 Jiri Kuthan Sent: 2008-8-30 (星期六) 4:01 To: Steven Wu Cc: SER Users Subject: Re: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy dropped our ACK in double hold case. Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking. Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
Best regards, Steven Wu
*From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com] *Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11 *To:* Steven Wu *Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users *Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu Steven.Wu@teleca.com
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
Victor Pascual A'vila
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Arun Kumar -
Jiri Kuthan -
Steven Wu -
Victor Pascual Ávila