28 Aug
2008
28 Aug
'08
9:18 a.m.
Hi All,
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for my company needs
suggestion on SER version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like
waiting transaction, extra connection to mysql, so which version should I
roll out.
thanks
arun
28 Aug
28 Aug
9:41 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Kumar <arunvoip(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for
my company needs
suggestion on SER version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like
waiting transaction, extra connection to mysql, so which version should I
roll out.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2008-August/012892.html
Hope it helps,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
9:44 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: SER Version
Hi Victor & Arun,
Which is the up to date SER version?
I can just down ser 0.9.6 on iptel website but when I register to iptel.org the server
indicate
it's version is 2.1.0-dev23-make.
May I get this version ser somewhere?
----
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.57.39.114:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8q00ttgepthc6u0u8rhp57m;rport=10009;received=220.197.157.133
From: <sip:cdvoip3@iptel.org>;tag=61fgttlqn5hc79q48rhq
To: <sip:cdvoip3@iptel.org>;tag=b98f1230ac1a7949bf499aa7f9ea7038.bad9
CSeq: 333613 REGISTER
Call-ID: YtIeZyeuoIdK0ArzvPCC1C1iQ3YPvF
Expires: 600
Min-Expires: 240
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="iptel.org",
nonce="SKUP4EilD9a7q1HsqxFT8Equkrtq95CFm1Z7+4E=", qop="auth"
Server: Sip EXpress router (2.1.0-dev23-make (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Warning: 392 213.192.59.75:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=23231
req_src_ip=220.197.157.133 req_src_port=10009 in_uri=sip:iptel.org;transport=UDP
out_uri=sip:iptel.org;transport=UDP via_cnt==1"
---
Best regards,
Steven Wu
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org 代表 Victor Pascual ávila
Sent: 2008-8-28 (星期四) 15:41
To: Arun Kumar
Cc: SER Users
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER Version
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Kumar <arunvoip(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm planning to roll out a new production SER for my company needs suggestion on SER
version. At present I run 0.9.6 and having some issue like waiting transaction, extra
connection to mysql, so which version should I roll out.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2008-August/012892.html
Hope it helps,
--
Victor Pascual ávila
10:11 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
10:27 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel SIP proxy
dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org due to our NAT
box has some problem.
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
Best regards,
Steven Wu
________________________________
From: Victor Pascual ávila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com]
Sent: 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
To: Steven Wu
Cc: Arun Kumar; SER Users
Subject: Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual ávila
29 Aug
29 Aug
10:01 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in
my SIP UA that iptel
SIP proxy dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org
due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local
networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
Best regards,
Steven Wu
*From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
*To:* Steven Wu
*Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users
*Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual A'vila
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
30 Aug
30 Aug
6:08 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
2008/8/29 Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Are you using ALG?
You can find examples in [1].
[1] http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg
Hope this helps,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
Steven Wu wrote:
>
> Hi Victor,
Excuse me Steven, I just missed your message.
Is it version
same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug
in my SIP UA that iptel
SIP proxy dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org
due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of? So, I want to
install a same SIP proxy at our local networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
6:14 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SER dropped 200OK in double hold case
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
What kind of?
I have tested with ser-2.0, Our UA still has some problem when use SER 2.0.
200OK was dropped in double hold case.
The scenario is:
UA1 SER UA2
INVITE-> I NVITE->
200OK<- 200OK<-
ACK-> ACK->
INVITE(sendonly)<- INVITE(sendonly)<-
200OK(recvonly)-> 200OK(recvonly)->
ACK<- ACK<-
INVITE(inactive)-> INVITE(inactive)->
200OK(inactive)<-
SER dropped this 200OK
UA1 use TCP connect to SER
UA2 use UDP connect to SER
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org 代表 Jiri Kuthan
Sent: 2008-8-30 (星期六) 4:01
To: Steven Wu
Cc: SER Users
Subject: Re: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in
my SIP UA that iptel
SIP proxy dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org
due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local
networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
Best regards,
Steven Wu
*From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
*To:* Steven Wu
*Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users
*Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual A'vila
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:20 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: 答复: SER Version
Victor Pascual Avila wrote:
Steven Wu wrote:
>
> Hi Victor,
>Excuse me Steven, I just missed your message.
Is it version
same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug
in my SIP UA that iptel
SIP proxy dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org
due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of? >Are you using ALG?
I'm not sure, because I can't check my NAT box. But it seems like that.
So, I want to
install a same SIP proxy at our local networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB. >You can find examples in [1].
>[1]
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg
<http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/ser-oob.cfg>
>Hope this helps,
Thank you!
I'll try my SER 2.0 with this config file
>--
>Victor Pascual ávila
6:31 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: 答复: SER Version
2008/8/30 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>om>:
I'll try my SER 2.0 with this config file
Note that you may only need to use part of it-- Please, read it
carefully, specially applicability and requirements sections.
Thank you for flying ser :-)
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
5742
days inactive
5744
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Arun Kumar -
Jiri Kuthan -
Steven Wu -
Victor Pascual Ávila