Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Can you elaborate a little? I didn't understand you. Best regards, Leonid
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
In terms of private/public IP addresses,in kamailio you would need to "advertise" the public IP address, such that:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060
So kamailio, when sending out, utilises that public (advertise) IP address as its own address. I don't know of any mechanism that allows you to set two different public IP addresses as advertised addresses.
You _can_ receive from multiple public IPs by setting multiple aliases, like:
alias=123.123.123.123:5060 alias=213.213.213.213:5060
and kamailio would process them as its own IPs. But when sending out, it will use the ADVERTISED address.
So the correct thing to do is to have multiple private address mapped one-to-one to public ip address, i.e.:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060 listen=udp:192.168.0.20:5060 ADVERTISE 213.213.213.213:5060
This _would_ work properly.
Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:04 PM Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Can you elaborate a little? I didn't understand you. Best regards, Leonid
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
David, My problem is actually rtpproxy. I have to use a particular IP as the source address for RTP sending. Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein Xorcom Ltd
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:51 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
In terms of private/public IP addresses,in kamailio you would need to "advertise" the public IP address, such that:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060
So kamailio, when sending out, utilises that public (advertise) IP address as its own address. I don't know of any mechanism that allows you to set two different public IP addresses as advertised addresses.
You _can_ receive from multiple public IPs by setting multiple aliases, like:
alias=123.123.123.123:5060 alias=213.213.213.213:5060
and kamailio would process them as its own IPs. But when sending out, it will use the ADVERTISED address.
So the correct thing to do is to have multiple private address mapped one-to-one to public ip address, i.e.:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060 listen=udp:192.168.0.20:5060 ADVERTISE 213.213.213.213:5060
This _would_ work properly.
Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:04 PM Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Can you elaborate a little? I didn't understand you. Best regards, Leonid
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
You will have the same problem.
Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:05 PM Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
David, My problem is actually rtpproxy. I have to use a particular IP as the source address for RTP sending. Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein Xorcom Ltd
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:51 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
In terms of private/public IP addresses,in kamailio you would need to "advertise" the public IP address, such that:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060
So kamailio, when sending out, utilises that public (advertise) IP address as its own address. I don't know of any mechanism that allows you to set two different public IP addresses as advertised addresses.
You _can_ receive from multiple public IPs by setting multiple aliases, like:
alias=123.123.123.123:5060 alias=213.213.213.213:5060
and kamailio would process them as its own IPs. But when sending out, it will use the ADVERTISED address.
So the correct thing to do is to have multiple private address mapped one-to-one to public ip address, i.e.:
listen=udp:192.168.0.10:5060 ADVERTISE 123.123.123.123:5060 listen=udp:192.168.0.20:5060 ADVERTISE 213.213.213.213:5060
This _would_ work properly.
Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:04 PM Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Can you elaborate a little? I didn't understand you. Best regards, Leonid
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com> wrote:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Regards,
David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Leonid,
as an idea how you can solve this problem you can take a look at the config of plusnet SBCOS (Kamailio and rtpengine based)
They use an privat to public selector in a smart way.
The dispatcher use the attrs with socket parameter as selector (your routing problem solved) and the address module to select ids for selector of rtpengine ips.
https://github.com/voiceboys/sbcOS/tree/master/SbcOS/configs/voice/kamailio
https://github.com/voiceboys/sbcOS/blob/master/DOC/TRUNKING_TRUNK
Cheers Karsten
Leonid Fainshtein leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com schrieb am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020, 17:18:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Thank you, Karsten. I’ll take a look. Meantime, I have have built the system by using two instances of rtpproxy. Best regards, Leonid
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 21:04 Karsten Horsmann khorsmann@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Leonid,
as an idea how you can solve this problem you can take a look at the config of plusnet SBCOS (Kamailio and rtpengine based)
They use an privat to public selector in a smart way.
The dispatcher use the attrs with socket parameter as selector (your routing problem solved) and the address module to select ids for selector of rtpengine ips.
https://github.com/voiceboys/sbcOS/tree/master/SbcOS/configs/voice/kamailio
https://github.com/voiceboys/sbcOS/blob/master/DOC/TRUNKING_TRUNK
Cheers Karsten
Leonid Fainshtein leonid.fainshtein@xorcom.com schrieb am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020, 17:18:
Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1
When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface.
Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses?
Thank you in advance, Leonid
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
David Villasmil -
Karsten Horsmann -
Leonid Fainshtein