21 Jul
2015
21 Jul
'15
5:03 p.m.
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR,
I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use
the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual
registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of
registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
21 Jul
21 Jul
5:12 p.m.
sorry, I forgot to mention, this is kamailio v4.3.1:
# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 4.3.1 (x86_64/linux) f38e67
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: f38e67
compiled on 18:15:23 Jul 20 2015 with gcc 4.4.7
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same
AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and
I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual
registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of
registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
22 Jul
22 Jul
1:41 p.m.
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I
would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same
AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and
I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual
registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of
registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
1:48 p.m.
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the
module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime,
you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I
would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
--
*** We're rebranding! Learn more here
<http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/> ***
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered
office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street,
Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR,
I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the
0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual
registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of
registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
1:50 p.m.
Thanks Charles, I'll send some examples of what I am on about to you in
the next 30 minutes or so.
On 22/07/2015 11:48, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with
the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended
behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the
meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00(a)gmail.com
<mailto:00asgaroth00@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this,
however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to
the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the
same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter
set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts
registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node
where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact
for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms
of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
*** We're rebranding! Learn more here
<http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/> ***
www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.
Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt
Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
24 Jul
24 Jul
10:35 a.m.
FYI, I opened issue #265 for this particular oddity :-)
On 22/07/2015 11:48, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with
the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended
behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the
meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00(a)gmail.com
<mailto:00asgaroth00@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this,
however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to
the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the
same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter
set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts
registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node
where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact
for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms
of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
*** We're rebranding! Learn more here
<http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/> ***
www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.
Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt
Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3439
days inactive
3442
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Asgaroth -
Charles Chance