Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
sorry, I forgot to mention, this is kamailio v4.3.1:
# kamailio -V version: kamailio 4.3.1 (x86_64/linux) f38e67 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: f38e67 compiled on 18:15:23 Jul 20 2015 with gcc 4.4.7
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers, Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth 00asgaroth00@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Thanks Charles, I'll send some examples of what I am on about to you in the next 30 minutes or so.
On 22/07/2015 11:48, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers, Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00@gmail.com mailto:00asgaroth00@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list. If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent information/examples directly to them. Thanks On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function. When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR. Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug? Thanks _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users*** We're rebranding! Learn more here http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/ ***
www.sipcentric.com http://www.sipcentric.com/
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
FYI, I opened issue #265 for this particular oddity :-)
On 22/07/2015 11:48, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers, Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00@gmail.com mailto:00asgaroth00@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list. If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent information/examples directly to them. Thanks On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function. When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR. Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug? Thanks _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users*** We're rebranding! Learn more here http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/ ***
www.sipcentric.com http://www.sipcentric.com/
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Asgaroth -
Charles Chance