Thanks Charles, I'll send some examples of what I am on about to you in the next 30 minutes or so.

On 22/07/2015 11:48, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,

It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.

I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.

Cheers,
Charles


On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.

If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent information/examples directly to them.

Thanks

On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,

I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.

When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.

Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of registration or have a come accross another bug?

Thanks



_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




** We're rebranding! Learn more here **

www.sipcentric.com

Follow us on twitter @sipcentric

Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users