Hi All,
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid ' 5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive.
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
Thanks Brian
On Wednesday 11 August 2010, dotnetdub wrote:
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.commailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf 52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
Hi Brian,
this message is produced from a UA that sends and ACK to an dialog which is in the early state, which is invalid. We also see it from time to time in our logs because of some buggy UAs - its harmless.
If you see it in every call setup, then this is a but too much to my understanding, but maybe you could do some traces to get more informations about the SIP msg flow.
BTW, if you see some more "bogus event" with other event IDs in the logs, Timo did a bunch of fixes some time ago that should suppress most invalid messages.
Cheers,
Henning
2010/8/11 Henning Westerholt henning.westerholt@1und1.de
On Wednesday 11 August 2010, dotnetdub wrote:
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com<mailto:
5959362a340dfa7938cf
52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com>' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
Hi Brian,
this message is produced from a UA that sends and ACK to an dialog which is in the early state, which is invalid. We also see it from time to time in our logs because of some buggy UAs - its harmless.
If you see it in every call setup, then this is a but too much to my understanding, but maybe you could do some traces to get more informations about the SIP msg flow.
BTW, if you see some more "bogus event" with other event IDs in the logs, Timo did a bunch of fixes some time ago that should suppress most invalid messages.
Cheers,
Henning
Thanks Henning,
The same endpoint never causes our Kamailio 1.4.1 servers to generate this message. I have watched the SIP transactions and the ACK always seems to arrive at the correct point in the dialog. The endpoint is Asterisk 1.4.22.
Thanks, Brian
On 11.08.2010 23:39, dotnetdub wrote:
The same endpoint never causes our Kamailio 1.4.1 servers to generate this message. I have watched the SIP transactions and the ACK always seems to arrive at the correct point in the dialog. The endpoint is Asterisk 1.4.22.
The reason why you never saw the message show up on Kamailio 1.4 was probably that the same race condition was fixed in Kamailio at some point (I believe the thread you referred to in your initial mail mentioned that, specifically by Ovidiu).
However, when the tm module changed in SIP-Router 3 somewhat, the fix was left out and only brought back in by Daniel at the beginning of July. As I pointed out in my last mail, this fix apparently didn't make it into any branch other than master yet.
Cheers,
--Timo
Hey Brian,
On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive.
The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a patch to master on 2 July
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it into 3.0:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already.
HTH,
--Timo
On Wednesday 11 August 2010, Timo Reimann wrote:
[..] It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already.
Thanks for the clarification Timo,
i forgot about the state of the race condition in current 3.0 branch.
Henning
Hi Timo,
On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
Hey Brian,
On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive.
The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a patch to master on 2 July
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it into 3.0:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
Cheers, Daniel
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already.
HTH,
--Timo
On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Timo,
On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
Hey Brian,
On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive.
The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a patch to master on 2 July
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it into 3.0:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
Cheers, Daniel
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already.
HTH,
--Timo
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/
Thanks Gents.
I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
Brian
You just said "drops," like an album! LOL. I approve! :)
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 1170 Peachtree Street 12th Floor, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:02 PM, dotnetdub dotnetdub@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hi Timo,
On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: Hey Brian,
On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote: I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com' and tags 'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive. The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a patch to master on 2 July
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it into 3.0:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
Cheers, Daniel
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted. It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already.
HTH,
--Timo
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/
Thanks Gents.
I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
Brian
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On 8/12/10 6:02 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Timo, On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: Hey Brian, On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote: I see this in every call setup.. CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com> <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com>>' and tags 'as5b636a8a' '' I am running SIP-Router 3.01 I note this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html but it's inconclusive. The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a patch to master on 2 July http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it into 3.0: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet. Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view? it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html Cheers, Daniel It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted. It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out, occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed out already. HTH, --Timo -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/
Thanks Gents.
I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
the patch is also in 3.0.x, you have to get latest git branch kamailio_3.0 -- no need to wait for 3.1.0.
Cheers, Daniel