12 Aug
2010
12 Aug
'10
4:02 p.m.
On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Timo,
On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
It
definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of
SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when
the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out,
occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed
out already.
HTH,
--Timo
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
Thanks Gents.
I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
Brian
Hey Brian,
On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with
bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
Cheers,
Daniel
It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
I see this in every call setup..
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for
dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid
'5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7(a)my.proxy.com
<mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7@my.proxy.com>' and tags
'as5b636a8a' ''
I am running SIP-Router 3.01
I note this
thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
but it's inconclusive.
The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a
patch to master on 2 July
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it
into 3.0:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be
looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which
means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router
that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable
to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?