Hi,
I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee when dialog timeout happends.
The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE.
BR, Uri
"BYE headers"? Which headers?
Uri Shacked ushacked@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee when dialog timeout happends.
The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE.
BR, Uri
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
You probably meant the To and From headers, I'm guessing.
Yeah, as long as there is no display name component, URIs in headers like that don't have to go in <>s. The way Kamailio sends it is grammatically valid, per RFC 3261. The user agents are at fault for not understanding it correctly.
Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com wrote:
"BYE headers"? Which headers?
Uri Shacked ushacked@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee when dialog timeout happends.
The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE.
BR, Uri
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully-fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Sent from my Nexus 10, with all the figments of autocorrect that might imply.
Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
Yes, i meant the FROM and TO. I think in version 3.2.0 the headers had theses < >.... So, even if the user agents (vendors stacks) are at fault.... how can i deal with it? any ideas?
You probably meant the To and From headers, I'm guessing.
Yeah, as long as there is no display name component, URIs in headers like
that don't have to go in <>s. The way >Kamailio sends it is grammatically valid, per RFC 3261. The user agents are at fault for not understanding it correctly.
Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.comhttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
wrote:
*"BYE headers"? Which headers? *>* *>*Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.comhttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
wrote: *>* *>>*Hi, *>>* *>>*I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and *>>*callee *>>*when dialog timeout happends. *>>* *>> *The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". *>>*So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE. *>>* *>>*BR, *>>*Uri *
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Uri Shacked ushacked@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee when dialog timeout happends.
The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE.
BR, Uri
-
Alex Balashov -
Uri Shacked