Yes, i meant the FROM and TO.

I think in version 3.2.0 the headers had theses < >....

So, even if the user agents (vendors stacks) are at fault.... how can i deal with it?

any ideas?

 

>You probably meant the To and From headers, I'm guessing.
>
>Yeah, as long as there is no display name component, URIs in headers like that don't have to go in <>s. The way >Kamailio sends it is grammatically valid, per RFC 3261. The user agents are at fault for not understanding it correctly.
>
>
>Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
>
>"BYE headers"? Which headers? > >Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and >>callee >>when dialog timeout happends. >> >>The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". >>So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE. >> >>BR, >>Uri