Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route - sr-users

29 Jan 2011

Hi,

that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)

One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the request
was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?

Best regards,
Bernhard 

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.suttner@winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route

...
  Yes.

 --
 Alex Balashov - Principal
 Evariste Systems LLC
 260 Peachtree Street NW
 Suite 2200
 Atlanta, GA 30303
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Fax: +1-404-961-1892
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

 On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" &lt;bernhard.suttner(a)winet.ch 
  wrote:  
  Hi,

 is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I  
 mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route 
 [NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is  
 possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally  
 called from the main route { ... }

 Thanks in advance.

 Best regards,
 Bernhard

 _______________________________________________
 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing  
 list
 sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 