29 Jan
2011
29 Jan
'11
9:45 p.m.
Hi,
that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)
One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the request
was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?
Best regards,
Bernhard
----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.suttner@winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route
Yes.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" <bernhard.suttner(a)winet.ch
wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I
mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route
[NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is
possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally
called from the main route { ... }
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bernhard
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users