Daniel,
What do you think about moving the (k) presence modules to standard
for the next 3.1 kamailio release?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
<andrei(a)iptel.org> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2010 at 11:29, Ovidiu Sas
<osas(a)voipembedded.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Andrei
Pelinescu-Onciul
<andrei(a)iptel.org> wrote:
You mean there are no presence modules in the default config (which
right now uses common modules + modules comming from ser).
You can use the presence modules under modules_k (the ones comming from
kamailio), although they might not mix well with the ser-like DB (ser
presence modules are obsolete).
If ser presence modules are obsolete, can we move them to the obsolete
directory and promote k ones to stadard?
They already under obsolete/, except for presence_b2b.
Moving the k ones to standard should be ok, as soon as someone can check
that they do not depend on some modules still under modules_k (e.g.
using an API implemented in one of them) and they are independent from
the DB tables point of view (they use their own tables or tables that
are the same both in k and ser).
Basically if someone introduces them in a ser config, they wouldn't
cause any problems.
Andrei