2 Mar
2016
2 Mar
'16
1:04 p.m.
On 01/03/16 17:23, Uri Shacked wrote:
It should work to send the 487
with any To-tag, because the call is not
answered yet and the proxy can do parallel/serial forking, where there
are various tags anyhow and only one is picked up in normal case.
Have you tried to just send the 487 reply with send_reply()? Wasn't working?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
/On 01 Mar
2016, at 16:29, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com
<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote:
/>//>/Hi, />//>/Is i possible to control the to_tag when i send my own
stateless reply
from kamailio. /
Why would you want to do that? Curious.
I did however lack the capability of accessing the Kamailioi defined to-tag in the
scripts. Maybe we should make
it available in a pseudovariable somewhere.
/O
I have a need (unfortunately :-)) to suspend the 200ok answer that i s
being relayed to the caller.
I am using t_suspend() and t_continue() for it.
But, when the caller decide to cancel the call before I managed to
resume the transaction, I would like to send a 487 stateless in order
for the client to disconnect immediately.
So, I need to send the 487 with the relevant to_tag.