Re: [Serusers] Interop? Re: [Serdev] Re: Re: TECHNICAL BOARD - Nomination and voting is open!

Shall not we have another narrowly focused group for resolving interop issues, ideally recruited on a wider basis than SER contributors? -jiri At 12:41 24/05/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote: > Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it > may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core > achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model > achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on > operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long > list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, > Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become > longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...) > > > -jiri > > At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote: > > >> I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei >> Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik >> Scholz. >> >> Jan. >> >> Greger V. Teigre wrote: >> >> >>> Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and >>> when people accept the nominations. >>> >>> Let me start: >>> I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the >>> two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across >>> SER), N. (sip(a)arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to >>> long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user >>> community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book >>> auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider >>> installations). >>> >>> As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS >>> representative/developer, I only nominate four. >>> g-) >>> >>> >>> SIP wrote: >>> >>> >>>> You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track >>>> of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when >>>> deciding their votes. Just an idea. >>>> >>>> I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating >>>> stuff! Seconded? ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> N. >>>> >>>> >>>> Greger Viken Teigre wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in >>>>> decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the >>>>> mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear >>>>> rationale in order to prefer it. >>>>> g-) >>>>> ------- Original message ------- >>>>> From: Martin Hoffmann <hn(a)nvnc.de> >>>>> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, serdev(a)lists.iptel.org, semsdev(a)iptel.org >>>>> Sent: 18.5.'07, 10:54 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Greger V. Teigre wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote. My >>>>>>> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and >>>>>>> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building: >>>>>>> posting to the list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be >>>>>> secret. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Martin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Serusers mailing list >>>>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serdev mailing list >> Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev >> >> -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/