[SR-Users] R: Re: R: Re: RTPPROXY & BRANCH

Without rtpproxy: - A offers port a1,a2 (audio video) in INVITE to B,C (in case of no natted client so no needs of rtpproxy) - B offers port b1,b2 (183) - C offers port c1,c2 (182). - A starts to send audio/video RTP to B on port b1,b2 - A starts to send audio/video RTP to C on port c1,c2 With rtpproxy: - A offers port a1,a2 (audio video) in INVITE to Kamailio.... - Kamailio contact rtpproxy because B&C are natted clients - rtpproxy check callid and offer offers port k1,k2.... - Kamailio sends INVITE to B offering k1,k2 - Kamailio sends INVITE to C offering k1,k2 - B offers port b1,b2 (183) - C offers port c1,c2 (182) - Kamailio sends 183 to A (for B leg) offering p1,p2 - Kamailio sends 183 to A (for B leg) offering p3,p4 - A starts to stream on p1,p2,p3,p4 but only one receiver can see the video (B or C depends who will be the first:)) I don't know if it depends on that B & C receives same ports; i don't know if rtpproxy is able to "duplicate" stream received from A to all "receiver" -----Messaggio originale----- Da: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] Per conto di Richard Fuchs Inviato: lunedì 29 settembre 2014 20:31 A: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Oggetto: Re: [SR-Users] R: Re: R: Re: RTPPROXY & BRANCH On 09/29/14 14:23, Marino Mileti wrote: I still don't understand what difference an RTP proxy is supposed to make for the invite. Your offering client only opens one endpoint and sends that out. Without RTP proxy, all receiving clients see the same endpoint and they will all send their early media to that same endpoint. With RTP proxy, the same thing happens. What's the difference? cheers _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users --- Questa e-mail è priva di virus e malware perché è attiva la protezione avast! Antivirus. http://www.avast.com