Re: [Serusers] rtpproxy: How to force it to send packets out aspecificinterface?

Hi everyone, Is there someone that managed to set up load-balancing on RTPproxies? Regards, Jérôme -----Message d'origine----- De : serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] De la part de jerome.herve(a)orange-ftgroup.com Envoyé : mardi 30 juin 2009 15:31 À : frank.durda(a)hypercube-llc.com; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Objet : Re: [Serusers] rtpproxy: How to force it to send packets out aspecificinterface? Hi Franck, Did you get any answer for your problem? I'm currently trying to set up a platform with kind of your configuration. How do you set load balancing between rtpproxies? Is there something to specify in the ser configuration file? Thanks a lot for your help Jérôme -----Message d'origine----- De : serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] De la part de Frank Durda IV Envoyé : jeudi 25 juin 2009 00:46 À : serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Objet : [Serusers] rtpproxy: How to force it to send packets out a specificinterface? I am running SER/rtpproxy on some systems with multiple cores and multiple ethernet interfaces. I am running multiple copies of rtpproxy, each with an IP address associated with a particular interface, as in one rtpproxy is using em1 which is 208.33.44.3 and em2 is 208.33.44.4 which another rtpproxy listens at, while ser listens in em0 at 208.33.44.2. These three (actually ten) interfaces pass through ethernet switches and then on to a router with a default gateway of 208.33.44.1 and then off to the Internet or wherever. (In my setup, each rtpproxy has a second interface pointing into a private network, so only one side of a call appears on any given interface and five face toward the Internet.) SER+rtpproxy correctly divides RTP traffic for calls to 208.33.44.3 and 208.33.44.4 in the SDP payloads, and callers send their RTP packets to the two rtproxies IP addresses without problems. That part works just fine. The problem is that rtpproxy is using the default route for transmission, so everything that goes towards the Internet goes out via em0, so em1 and em2 don't transmit anything. This means that this one link is overwhelmed by the traffic that should have been divided across multiple links. Rtpproxy is allowing the local route table and the default route to handle the outgoing packets and so the packets are all going out the same interface. In my case, em0 was 100Mbit/sec (completely sufficient for SIP messages, while em1 and em2 were gigabit links to handle RTP, but they are getting used only in one direction. Even if em0 was upgraded to Gbit, it would still not be able to handle the potential for 2+ Gbit of data from the rtproxies. So, is there any way to force rtproxy to perform what I believe they used to call "reflector mode", where the answers go out the same interface they come in on? (This used to be common on UDP-based NFS file servers.) A number of communication programs also allow this behavior as an option, but rtpproxy doesn't appear to do it or it isn't turned on by default. Because the destinations for the RTP are out on the Internet somewhere, I don't believe I can solve this via "route" or "ifconfig" settings, but would be delighted if someone knows different or knows of a setting change in rtpproxy that will do this so that load balancing will work. The OS in question is FreeBSD 7.2, but I have the same issue on 6.2 and 6.3. Thanks in advance! _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers