Re: [SR-Users] Which algorithm to use as load-balance

sorry, instead of ruri, i use destination. Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:31 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > I compiled and i'm testing 5.2, but it doesn't seem to be doing what I > was expecting, my config is as follows: > > route[DISPATCH] { > dp_match("1", "$ru"); > > if(!ds_select_routes("1=4;11=9", "ruri", "10")) > { > send_reply("404", "No destination"); > exit; > } else { > xlog("[DISPATCH] ds_select_dst was succesful\n"); > } > xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); > t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); > route(RELAY); > exit; > } > > And my table is: > > > +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ > | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | > attrs | description | > > +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ > | 213 | 1 | sip:34.201.28.49:5080 | 0 | 10 | > weight=100 | node1-proxy | > | 229 | 1 | sip:54.209.229.198:5080 | 0 | 10 | > weight=100 | node2-proxy | > | 232 | 11 | sip:35.170.67.206:5080 | 0 | 10 | > weight=100 | node3-proxy | > > +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ > > But kamailio is always sending to the same ip 198, although it should be > load-balancing round-robin to the 2 nodes on setid 1. And when those 2 > nodes have 10 calls, then start sending to setid 11. > > Is my config wrong? > > Regards, > > David Villasmil > email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com > phone: +34669448337 > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:09 PM David Villasmil < > david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Ah, 5.2 branch. Will test it, thanks! >> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >> miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> besides master, you can also use branch 5.2 -- this is going to be used >>> to release 5.2.0 and other future 5.2.x versions. Those two branches have >>> the same version of the module at this moment. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> On 15.11.18 16:48, David Villasmil wrote: >>> >>> Hey Daniel, >>> >>> Thanks for replying. Can I test this from master? >>> >>> David >>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >>> miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> >>>> On 14.11.18 23:16, David Villasmil wrote: >>>> > Hello, >>>> > >>>> > Is it possible to set an algorithm like the following? >>>> > >>>> > fs1 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls >>>> > fs2 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls >>>> > fs3 - Priority 9 - maxload 20 calls >>>> > fs4 - Priority 8 - maxload 20 calls >>>> > fs5 - Priority 7 - maxload 20 calls >>>> > >>>> > So that, whenever any new call comes in, fs1 and fs2 would be used, >>>> > meaning the fs with the highest priority would be use UNLESS there's >>>> > 20 calls on that server, in which case, the next server with the >>>> > highest priority would be used. >>>> > >>>> this should be easier possible with the upcoming 5.2.0 (to be released >>>> in about 2 weeks or so), see: >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatc… >>>> >>>> For older versions you may need to do more complex logic in the >>>> configuration file to call dispatcher for different groups at different >>>> stages of failure re-routing. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com >>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- >>>> www.asipto.com >>>> >>>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>> >>>