6 Nov
2006
6 Nov
'06
2:17 p.m.
Hi Jiri,
are you aware of a backport of the new timers from 0.10
to 0.9.6? Though we are going to test the prerelease, it is marked as
unstable, so it's hardly an option for us. Any help on this issue would be
great.
Marcus
On Monday 06 November 2006 10:17, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
At 05:40 06/11/2006, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
Hello Marcus.
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 15:46, Marcus Hunger wrote:
I would definitely try this first. The thing is that the old timer system
was fast but not flexible, and variable timers just slowed down. The new
timer system should address that. Can you share with us if it made things
better for you?
-jiri
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Hi list,
I am trying to realise dynamic invite-timeout-timers loading
timer-settings per call from my database using avp. It seems to work
perfectly on my development-system but fails nearly completly in my high
loaded life-environment. According to my logs, timer values are set
correctly (eg.: reply_received: FR_INV_TIMER = 15, see
modules/tm/t_reply.c:1371), but most of the times the timers have no
effect.
My setup is similar to
http://siprouter.onsip.org/doc/gettingstarted/ch09.html, but avps are
not written by hand, but acquired with:
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer_avp", "mytimer");
avp_db_load("$ruri/username","s:mytimer");
'mytimer' is an attribute in an usr_preferences-table.
Ser's version is 0.9.6.
I already searched the list-archives without finding anything regarding
this issue. I Also failed accessing the bug-tracker
(http://bugs.sip-router.org/), it gave me an internal server error.
Has anybody experienced this effect? Is this a bug? Is there a
workaround?
I'm not sure but the new timer implementation in SER head might solve this
problem.