Hello,
I will look to see what happens with the outgoing ACK, probably tomorrow
or so. Btw, there is no need to apologize, here are open discussions,
reporting issues, throwing ideas, bad or good, the conclusion comes
after some analysis and help from the others. It's hard to know
everything and who does not care does not participate.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 8/11/11 4:32 PM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I put on setflag before WITHINDLG,
so AFAIK the ACK as a new transaction is executing this step.
The root of my problem is that I can see the incoming E2E ACK, but i
couldn't see the "outgoing"!
route {
#pike flood detection
if (!pike_check_req()) { exit; };
# per request initial checks
route(REQINIT);
#siptrace
setflag(22);
sip_trace();
xdbg("SIP Request: \n $mb \n");
# NAT detection
route(NAT);
# handle requests within SIP dialogs
route(WITHINDLG);
And in debug i can't find where want kamailio log/trace the _outgoing_
message.
I can see only that it will be forwarded in stateless way.
This is why i started to dig in sl modul. But thank You, now i see it
was a mistake. sorrrrrrrry.
Sorry for the early case opening, you are right not sl causing that. I
thought i find something. sorry again.
But i can see only incoming E2E ACK and I can't see the outgoing pair
in siptrace.
In TM modul i can't see where it is calling back siptrace in case of
E2E ack.
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[socket_info.c:501]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 14==14
&& [195.11
1.192.14] == [195.111.192.14]
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[socket_info.c:504]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061
matches port 5061
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[parser/msg_parser.c:103]: found end of header
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: rr
[loose.c:257]: No next Route HF found
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: rr
[loose.c:834]: no next URI found
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_lookup.c:1379]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=68 , global msg id=67
, T on entrance=
0xffffffff
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_lookup.c:528]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=63155,
isACK=1
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_lookup.c:564]: DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction
matching
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_lookup.c:720]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: e2e proxy ACK found
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:301]: DEBUG: totag for e2e ACK found: 0
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0xb2954a38, callback type 4, id 0 entered
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: tm
[t_funcs.c:315]: SER: forwarding ACK statelessly
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[msg_translator.c:2437]: create_via_hf: id added: <;i=01>, rcv
proto=2
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(195.111.192.7,
195.111.192.7, 0)
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[forward.c:599]: Sending: ACK
sip:193.225.95.130:5061;transport=tls SIP/2.0^M
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 195.111.192.14:5061;branch=0;i=01^M Via:
SIP/2.0/TCP 195.111.192.7;branch=0;i=5fb^M Via: SIP/2.0/TLS
193.6.222.62:5061;bra
nch=z9hG4bK2619604118-1823^M Max-Forwards: 68^M
Proxy-Authorization: Digest
username="niif-tartalek",realm="195.111.192.7",nonce="TkOk+05Do
8/4J70CauQqX2GiwryZl/Do",uri="sip:9999@rmx.vvc.niif.hu",response="00e9a9991a2f93c44c25de309022cee8",algorithm=md5^M
From: niif-tartalek <si
p:niif-tartalek@195.111.192.7>;tag=plcm_2618225217-1823;epid=8210210CA530CG^M
To: <sip:9999@rmx.vvc.niif.hu>;tag=rmx2k_2618766049-17745-RMX
-0000000006-0080871424^M Call-ID: 2618224581-1823^M CSeq: 2 ACK^M
Contact: niif-tartalek
<sip:niif-tartalek@193.6.222.62:5061;transport=tls
;proxy=replace;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:615fd9bb-1986-52eb-9084-681c290b7e3a>"^M
User-Agent:Polycom HDX 8000 HD (Release - 3.0.2-11176)^M
Supported: ms-forking^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M .
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[forward.c:601]: orig. len=973, new_len=918, proto=3
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:2299]: tcp_send: found fd in cache ( 11, 0xb2922e88, 18)
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:2522]: tcp_send: sending...
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:2556]: tcp_send: after real write: c= 0xb2922e88 n=949
fd=11
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:2557]: tcp_send: buf=
^W^C^A^C<B0>@<B7>*<D9>^O<B5>-<D2>j<F9>N`<87>
lj<F4><8B><B5>B<CE>^VC^_V<FF><F4><D4>h'<ED><CE>sU<92><F8><84>]'<AD>**<EE>H;<94>]'2|<9F><C8>^FNu<CB>!<B0><B6><FC>Y2!<9A>
Ue(<E3><9E>M<88>x<8A>
<C1><EF><DD>^X<A4><A3>^A<D4><D0>¬f<B1><B0><B9>y^G^]
<85>?<86>@<AB><AB>We<C5><EF>4i
<84>^B<F2>kf^M<8E><<A7>^\<F3><D5>^U5<AE><AB><84><84><EB>
<A2>+V<9A>^R<9E><90>_p<AB>^F^Z<A3>i<E0><D0>^E??<CE>^D6LN4L<82><FE>^E<EA>p<F0>6u<A3>VT<94>C9<A7>d[dL1^D<BF><86><8F>3^M<BB><96>S<A8><A3>^^?kO
<F7>}Q;<<E6>M<A9>N,AE-F<9A><AE><A1>g<FB>w<95>
?^U^Q_<EF><E2><8F><EC>m&<F3>^^<EF><F4>^[<B8><91>e9#<A7>(<82>^Y<EF><83>^O{<8B><A3><B3>(K_
<EA>-
<CE>^F<E3>T<DD><FA><B6><C6><C0>R<B6><AE>mhs^T^G<8F><FF><E9><<F8><8A>|i<A3>?
qf<C3>^^G7<C7>ub<F0>&^R^D<C7>^R?<91><BC>uV<9D><F5>^[<F5><AF>w6
<93><98>`<B5>t7D<B1><E1><C5>^\<E3>6O<FC><84><9F><F1>y<E8>!v<9F><C1>;<AD><AA>x<AA><B6>^Z<A6>P<8E>Y<BA>^\<9D><A2><A6><A6><9E>3}70^K<CC>-<EA>h
<DB>^R^O2<D7>H+m:<A4><F5>??<BA><9B>^\<AD><B1><85><DF>c<FE><U+05FA><C0>,<87>a&^Z^U^V<A6>4<B0><A8>?<A9>?<F5>3<9E><D1>^[<E7><9D><F7>+<90>P<DA>
<E7>^^<D3>WO<ED><97><EF><B4>1<BA>?1<B7><B1><9F>X
Aug 11 11:42:06 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24381]: DEBUG: <core>
[usr_avp.c:646]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Thanks,
Misi
2011-08-11 15:38 keltezéssel, Daniel-Constantin Mierla írta:
Hello,
E2E ACK is getting to configuration file routing block. With the
latest stable version default config file, it is handled in the
route[WITHINDLG]. Be sure you call sip trace function there. This
will capture the incoming E2E ACK. For outgoing version, set the flag
and it should be captured in TM callback, iirc.
SL module is filtering the ACKs that are a result of negative replies
sent with SL module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:29 PM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály <misi(a)niif.hu
<mailto:misi@niif.hu>> wrote:
Hi,
I want to see all incoming and outgoing sip messages in sip trace
table, but i am missing messages.
I am using TLS so i can't see really trace the conversation only
this way.
I am wondering if it is know limitation, or an issue:
I am experiencing that E2E ACK is not logged in siptrace table.
I opened a ticket with the details:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=144&proj…
<http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=144&project=1&pagenum=1>
Many Thanks,
Misi
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users