11 Feb
2020
11 Feb
'20
12:31 p.m.
Thank to pointing that out.
I'm not sure about all the implications but yes, I think it is better to go
with kamailio v. 5 save() flag approach.
However, the guys at my company might want this change soon so I might need
to go with kamailio v. 4.
Of course, I always run load test before releasing.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:43 PM Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>
wrote
But you will see those changes in the pcap even
without
apply_message_changes
It is highly recommended to not use this function as it parses all message
again.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, 12:29 mayamatakeshi, <mayamatakeshi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:48 PM Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 08:03:29AM +0900,
mayamatakeshi wrote:
Indeed. This worked:
remove_hf("Expires");
append_hf("Expires: 200\r\n");
msg_apply_changes();
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Actually, my idea was to do something like this
before handing the
REGISTER
to registrar save() function:
remove_hf("Expires");
append_hf("Expires: 200\r\n");
However, this didn't work (or at least, it doesn't work with kamailio
4.3.7
which is the one I use).
These changes aren't applied to the processing of the current message
until you call msg_apply_changes().
Try adding and see if it works.