-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Oh, if You need any help in the debbuging/test process, let me know...
Edson.
- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Sobolev" sobomax@portaone.com To: "Edson Gellert Schubert" egschubert@ig.com.br Cc: "Lista SER - IPTEL" serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Proxy + NAT
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which would allow it to be used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I plan to release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all...
I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an
acceptable
option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the
SER
in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the
question
is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine
taken
over the NAT issues?
I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on
the
GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any
help
would be appreciated.
Edson.
#============================= f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9 =Y13k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers