29 Jan
2004
29 Jan
'04
3:36 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all...
I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an acceptable
option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the SER
in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the question
is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle
incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine taken
over the NAT issues?
I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on the
GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the
documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any help
would be appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Jan
29 Jan
2:02 p.m.
SER can be put inside the private network, but you will have to
configure your NAT to forward all the SIP traffic (port 5060) to the
machine running SER.
In addition to that you would have to forward some port numbers for
media to phones behind the NAT, for example 8000 -> IP of phone1, 8002
-> IP of phone 2, and so on.
Configuring ser for such operation is not easy, you would have to
rewrite the contents of SIP messages.
In conclusion, it can be done, but it is not trivial. Run SER in the
public internet if you can.
Jan.
On 29-01 00:36, Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
Hi all...
I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an acceptable
option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the SER
in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the question
is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle
incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine taken
over the NAT issues?
I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on the
GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the
documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any help
would be appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
18 Feb
18 Feb
5:39 p.m.
Regarding this maybe I have something to say:
set up a dual eth server, dont waste 2 weeks messing with a firewall like me :(
one public address for ser and web interface (if you have), restricted by
iptablesover certain ports
one private for samba, ssh, sendmail and all other things
The public card connects before the firewall, the private with all other
lan clients/server (I dont run a dmz)
29 Jan
29 Jan
2:13 p.m.
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which would allow it to be
used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I plan to
release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all...
I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an acceptable
option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the SER
in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the question
is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle
incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine taken
over the NAT issues?
I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on the
GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the
documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any help
would be appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:33 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sure I'll... ;)
Edson.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
To: "Edson Gellert Schubert" <egschubert(a)ig.com.br>
Cc: "Lista SER - IPTEL" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Proxy + NAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBlD7DdMQB7Du1dpEQKF3ACgxdCkOeHe8JFZp2ytrutYm4hPN58AoK7E
h5QJoF+W+ibGm4JNkGbp5LcW
=oDMU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which
would allow it
to be used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I
plan to release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay
tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all...
>
> I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
>
> The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an
acceptable
> option, well it's acceptable, but not for
now). So I'm trying to put the
SER
> in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a
DMZ also). So the
question
> is if there is any proxy that could be putted on
the GW/FW to handle
> incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine
taken
> over the NAT issues?
>
> I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
> incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on
the
> GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy
(RTProxy alternative) but the
> documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any
help
would be
appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:33 p.m.
Is it possible to get a copy of your version ? I would gladly help out
testing it.
- Atle
* Maxim Sobolev <sobomax(a)portaone.com> [040129 18:26]:
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which
would allow it to be
used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I plan to
release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all...
I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an acceptable
option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the
SER
in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the question
is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle
incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine taken
over the NAT issues?
I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on
the
GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the
documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any help
would be appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:34 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Oh, if You need any help in the debbuging/test process, let me
know...
Edson.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
To: "Edson Gellert Schubert" <egschubert(a)ig.com.br>
Cc: "Lista SER - IPTEL" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Proxy + NAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBlELDdMQB7Du1dpEQKWkgCfTMTuI13Weih9t+L/HKq4ts4H9SoAoKv+
tT7Ia5//ZJK5KhLi3Ittf8ZA
=NKa/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which
would allow it
to be used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I
plan to release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay
tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all...
>
> I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
>
> The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an
acceptable
> option, well it's acceptable, but not for
now). So I'm trying to put the
SER
> in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a
DMZ also). So the
question
> is if there is any proxy that could be putted on
the GW/FW to handle
> incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine
taken
> over the NAT issues?
>
> I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
> incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on
the
> GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy
(RTProxy alternative) but the
> documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any
help
would be
appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7373
days inactive
7393
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alessio Focardi -
Atle Samuelsen -
Edson Gellert Schubert -
Jan Janak -
Maxim Sobolev