4 Oct
2016
4 Oct
'16
1:58 a.m.
Hello;
Our goal is 100k
subscriber and i know that Asterisk cannot handle 3k subscriber
that sending options to keep open ports. So this situation is afraid
of me. Yeah ,You re right, dont trust endpoints. I think UAc
keep-alive mechanism can solve this. This is UAC's problem :)
I will just warn UAC production.
Thanks for reply.
Have a nice day.Cheers.
3.10.2016 16:19 tarihinde Daniel
Tryba-2 [via SIP Router] yazdı:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:35:59AM -0700, ycaner
wrote:
> it is simple way to solve this and it is softphone product
problem. If i did
> configuration as you said , it consumes so much socket , CPU
and etc. in
> future.
I can't imagine this will be a significant amount of cpu/traffic.
I can
only speak for my users, but near 100% is behind NAT or a
statefull
firewall. Treating the users as always NATed avoids a lot of
headaches
so far.
> I wonder that is there a something about it on ietf or
protocol flows. I
> think it is wrong.
>
> What do you think about it.
I can't find any info about this learning process via the Contact
header. But I have seen this kind of behavior with Patton
SmartNode
equipment, in these appliances this learning is related to the
UACs
keep-alive mechanism. This further supported my idea to never
trust any
endpoint device :)
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
[hidden email]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
If you reply to this email, your
message will be added to the discussion below:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/NatHelper-Received-adding-on-Contac…
To unsubscribe from NatHelper - Received adding on Contact
header, click
here .
NAML
--
yasin-imza-2016.jpg (23K)
<http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/attachment/152257/0/yasin-imza-2016.jpg>
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/NatHelper-Received-adding-on-Contac…
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.