Hello;
Our goal is 100k subscriber and i know that Asterisk cannot handle 3k subscriber that sending options to keep open ports. So this situation is afraid of me. Yeah ,You re right, dont trust endpoints. I think UAc keep-alive mechanism can solve this. This is UAC's problem :) I will just warn UAC production.
Thanks for reply.
Have a nice day.Cheers.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:35:59AM -0700, ycaner wrote:
> it is simple way to solve this and it is softphone product problem. If i did
> configuration as you said , it consumes so much socket , CPU and etc. in
> future.
I can't imagine this will be a significant amount of cpu/traffic. I can
only speak for my users, but near 100% is behind NAT or a statefull
firewall. Treating the users as always NATed avoids a lot of headaches
so far.
> I wonder that is there a something about it on ietf or protocol flows. I
> think it is wrong.
>
> What do you think about it.
I can't find any info about this learning process via the Contact
header. But I have seen this kind of behavior with Patton SmartNode
equipment, in these appliances this learning is related to the UACs
keep-alive mechanism. This further supported my idea to never trust any
endpoint device :)
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/NatHelper-Received-adding-on-Contact-header-tp152245p152249.html