Hi,
Actually it doesn't matter for me if it's active-passive as well. Just need
to make sure no disaster since my whole SBC is depending on kamailio
redirect server for passing traffic. Outbound route selection is mainly done
by mySQL queries and my SBC, Genband S3 has ability to distribute invite to
redirect servers. Do you think having two kamailio servers lined to
culstered mySQL server is simplest and most reliable solution? Or any other
better approach?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:ibc@aliax.net]
Sent: 13 July 2010 10:42
To: Maw Zin Tun - Real Telekom
Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Load Balancing REDIRECT
2010/7/12 Maw Zin Tun - Real Telekom <mzt(a)realtelekom.com>om>:
Hi,
I started using Kamailio 3.0 as redirect server about 2 months ago,
basically I'm quite new to it. Now I need to change current setup to
redundant active-active system but I'm struggling where to find
documentation that can lead me to achiving it. Can anyone pls advise
me where to start looking ?
Hi, please detail more your requeriments and what you want to achieve.
BTW "redundant active-active" is not very usual as it requires a SIP proxy
in front of the cluster, or a very complex/exotic stuff doing balancing at
level 2 between two Kamailio servers sharing the same IP (very exotic IMHO).
Main question is: why do you think you need a "redundant active-active
system"? Why is not valid a "active-pasive system" for you?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>