Re: [SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:03:24AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

Just in continue of the discussion forund in the RFC3261 12.1.2 (UAC behaivor) this:

The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI from the Contact header field of the response.

Indeed. What is your intended thesis?