19 Nov
2012
19 Nov
'12
11:46 a.m.
I don't have an explicit value set, and did not know about this
parameter. So, I suppose it defaults to 0.
What should I set it to to get the correct reply from every failed
branch in failure_route?
On 11/19/2012 04:13 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
what value you have for failure_reply_mode parameter of tm?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/14/12 3:12 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
I am using the latest pull of branch 3.3, and
t_branch_timeout()
doesn't work if the previous branch resulted in a reply (i.e. a
negative final reply).
That is to say, t_branch_timeout() == FALSE on a genuine timeout, as
long as the preceding branch provided a result (such as 404).
t_branch_timeout() == TRUE if this is a timeout, on the first branch.
In other words, it appears that if t_any_replied() == TRUE, then
t_branch_timeout() == FALSE, even for this branch, and even if the
branch really did time out (no response at all from destination).
That's not how the documentation says it should behave. Am I doing
something wrong? If so, how do I find out if _this particular_ branch
timed out, from the failure_route[]?
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda